Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1773 MP
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2021
1
CRA No.6247/2018
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Bench at Indore
Criminal Appeal No.6247/2018
Indore, Dated 04.05.2021
Hearing through Video Conferencing.
Mr. Manish Nair, learned counsel for appellant Vikram s/o
Mohanlal Bavri.
Mr. Devashish Dubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the
respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh.
Heard on IA No.3125/2021, second application under Section
389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of
jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant.
The present appellant has been convicted and sentenced by
learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge Neemuch, District Neemuch
(MP) in Special Sessions Trial No.33/2017 vide judgment dated 17 th
July, 2018, as under: -
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine amount Imprisonment in lieu of fine
363 IPC 2 years Rs.500/- 2 months RI
366 IPC 3 years Rs.500/- 2 months RI
5 (M) / 6 POCSO Act 10 years Rs.3,000/- 6 months RI
Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the earlier
suspension application IA No.2819/2019 was dismissed as
withdrawn on 31.07.2019. Counsel has submitted that the appellant
is in jail since 17.07.2018 and as such, he has already completed
around three years and seven months in incarceration.
Counsel has submitted that the prosecutrix though said to be
CRA No.6247/2018
minor at the time of incident, but she has stated in her cross
examination that she used to like the present appellant and had gone
with him on her own volition. So far as the age of the prosecutrix is
concerned, it is submitted that the appellant is charged under Section
5 (M) / 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act,
2012, which provides for an offence in respect of the victim, who is
below 12 years of age.
It is further submitted that otherwise also, the evidence
available on record is weak and as such, the appellant is entitled to
be released on bail.
It is also submitted that in the wake of fresh spread of COVID-
19, there is no possibility of early disposal of this appeal in near
future.
Counsel for the respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes
the application by submitting that no sufficient ground is made out
for releasing the appellant on bail; hence the application filed by the
appellant be dismissed.
Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the
statement of the prosecutrix as also the evidence available on record
in respect of her age, this Court is inclined to allow the present
application for suspension of sentence, especially looking to the
period of incarceration of the appellant.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the
CRA No.6247/2018
case, IA No.3125/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on
furnishing a personal bond by the appellant in the sum of
Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with a solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court,
for his / her regular appearance before concerned trial Court, the
execution of the custodial part of the sentence imposed against the
appellant shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of this
appeal.
The appellant, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his /
her presence before the concerned trial Court on 20.12.2021 and on
all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in
this regard.
Let the matter be listed for final hearing in due course.
C. c. as per rules.
(Subodh Abhyankar) Judge rcp
RAMESH CHANDRA PITHWE 2021.05.05 18:05:53 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!