Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Gwalior Vines Llp. Group Thr. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2140 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2140 MP
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
M/S Gwalior Vines Llp. Group Thr. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 June, 2021
Author: Prakash Shrivastava
                                   1                                 WP-7288-2021
        The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                   WP-7288-2021
   (M/S GWALIOR VINES LLP. GROUP THR. Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)


Jabalpur, Dated : 07-06-2021
      Heard through Video Conferencing.

      Shri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
      Shri A.P. Singh, learned Deputy A.G. for the respondent/State.

Heard.

The petitioner is aggrieved with the communication dated 25/02/2021

issued by the Excise Commissioner to all the Collectors of the State directing them to act in accordance with another circular dated 25/02/2021 (enclosed therewith).

By the circular dated 25/02/2021, it has been stated that the Clause 49 of the Excise Policy for the year 2020-2021 will be applicable to only those licensees, whose license had continued for the entire year and the same will not be applicable to those licensees, whose licenses have been discontinued.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the above direction is contrary to paragraph 128 of the order of the High Court dated

22/07/2020 passed in W.P. 7373/2020. He further submits that the same also runs counter to the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 10567/2020 dated 18/09/2020 in the case of Alcoactive Retail Traders Private Limited Vs. State of M.P. , whereby at the time of withdrawing the SLP, the Competent Authority was directed to consider the application made in terms of paragraph 128 of the High Court judgment within a time bound period. He has pointed out that the petitioners application dated 06/10/2020- Annexure P/17 filed in terms of paragraph 128 of the judgment of the High Court is still pending and the same has not been decided, therefore, a direction is required that the application be decided within a time bound period and the circular dated 25/02/2021 should not come in the way of the said decision.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that though the 2 WP-7288-2021 order dated 16/02/2021 was passed in W.P. No. 2601/2021 but in the light of the impugned circular dated 25/02/2021, the respondents have closed all the pending cases without deciding them.

Shri A.P. Singh, learned Deputy A.G. has fairly stated that there is no objection in deciding the petitioner's application in accordance with law within

a time bound period.

Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the present petition is disposed of by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's pending application in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Certified copy as per rules.

               (PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA)                                    (VIRENDER SINGH)
                      JUDGE                                                     JUDGE


        skt
SANTOSH KUMAR TIWARI
2021.06.08 15:38:46 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter