Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8169 MP
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.56973/2021
Arvind vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated :03/12/2021
Shri D.S. Rathore, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rajeev Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.
Case diary is available.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 11.10.2021 in connection
with Crime No.470/2021 registered at Police Station Maharajpura,
District Gwalior for offence under Sections 376(D), 506, 507, 34 of
IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the
incident is alleged to have taken place on 11.1.2020 whereas the
FIR was lodged on 27.7.2021. The only reason which has been
assigned by the prosecutrix for the delay in lodging the FIR is that
the applicant and the co-accused had threatened the prosecutrix. It
is submitted that this reason assigned by the prosecutrix is false
because the prosecutrix herself had lodged another FIR No.88/2020
in Police Station Maharajpura, District Gwalior against the
applicant on 14.2.2020 alleging the outraging of her modesty. If the
prosecutrix can lodge a FIR against the applicant in respect of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.56973/2021 Arvind vs. State of M.P.
offence which was allegedly taken place subsequent to the offence
of rape, then there was no reason for her to disclose this fact also at
the time of lodging of FIR in Crime No.88/2020. The applicant is
ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition which may be
imposed by the Court. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long
time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with
the prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the respondent/State. However, it is fairly conceded that
the FIR was lodged after one year and six months.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without
commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It
is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)
with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial
Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates
given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in
case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.56973/2021 Arvind vs. State of M.P.
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
(alok) Judge
ALOK KUMAR
2021.12.03 17:10:31 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!