Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2403 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2026
2026:KER:28320
WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1948
WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
1 BABY
AGED 72 YEARS
W/O LATE PADAMANABAHAN, THEKKINEDATHU HOUSE,
VALAPPAD P.O, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
680567
2 SEENA
AGED 51 YEARS
D/O LATE PADMANABHAN, THEKKINEDATHU HOUSE,
VALAPPAD P.O, CHAVAKKAD,, PIN - 680567
3 BINDHU
AGED 48 YEARS
D/O LATE PADMANABHAN, THEKKINEDATHU HOUSE,
VALAPPAD P.O, CHAVAKKAD, PIN - 680597
4 SURESH BABU
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O LATE PADMANABHAN, THEKKINEDATHU HOUSE,
VALAPPAD P.O, CHAVAKAKD,, PIN - 680567
BY ADV SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THEDISTRICT COLLECTOR
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD, CIVIL
STATION, KALPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 673121
2 THE TAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN
2026:KER:28320
WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
2
- 670646
3 THE ALL INDIA TRADE UNION CONGRESS (AITUC)
WAYANAD DISTRICT COUNCIL, M.N MEMORIAL, KALPETTA,
WAYANAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL
SECRETARY C.S STANLEY, PIN - 673121
4 ADDL.R4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VILLAGE OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT,
PIN 670 646 [ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER
DATED 08.04.2025 IN I.A.1/2025 IN WP(C)3986/2025].
BY ADVS.
SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S
SMT.SINDHU S KAMATH
SMT.SWAPNA S.K.
SMT.ROHINI NAIR
SHRI.SURAJ KUMAR D.
SHRI.SUNILKUMAR K.K.
SMT.A.KARTHIKA SIVAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30.03.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2026:KER:28320
WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are the legal heirs of Mr.Padmanabhan, who
purchased the subject property in the year 1991 as per Ext.P1
document and was also paying tax. In the year 1991, de hors
the sale, the seller instituted a suit, O.S No.142/1991,
seeking an injunction against Mr. Padmanabhan and others. The
suit was, however, withdrawn vide Ext.P4.
2. Mr. Padmanabhan passed away on 28.04.2012, and the
petitioners inherited the property and continued to pay tax.
It is the petitioners' case that the 3 rd respondent trespassed
into the property and claimed title therein. Ext.P7 is the
petition preferred by the 3 rd respondent before the Village
Officer seeking to stop collection of the tax from the
petitioners. An appeal was preferred before the Tahsildar and
subsequently before the District Collector.
3. Ext.P2 is the judgment which directed the District
Collector to consider and dispose of the petition preferred
by the petitioners. Accordingly, Ext.P12 Order was passed,
indicating that the collection of tax is only for fiscal
purposes, and that the inter se disputes between the 2026:KER:28320 WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
petitioners and the 3rd respondent has to be resolved in a
Civil Suit. Based on Ext.P12, the Tahsildar directed the
Village Officer to collect the tax from the petitioners, vide
Ext.P13. Accordingly, the petitioners paid tax along with
arrears, vide Ext.P14. However, by the impugned Ext.P15
Order, the Tahsildar recalled Ext.P13, and cancelled the
payment of tax, holding that the District Collector's Order
vide Ext.P12 has been misread by him.
4. The specific contention raised by the learned counsel
for the petitioner is that there has been violation of
principles of natural justice, as no notice, whatsoever, was
issued to the petitioner before the cancellation of Ext.P13.
5. The learned Government Pleader confirms that no
notice was issued to the petitioner before the issuance of
Ext.P15 impugned Order.
6. The learned counsel for the 3 rd respondent submits
that the petitioners subsequently assigned the property to
another person, and the dispute between the petitioners and
the 3rd respondent is still pending.
7. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties, this Court finds that Ext.P15 cannot be 2026:KER:28320 WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
sustained for a moment. Admittedly, the same was issued
without notice to the petitioner, which is ex-facie illegal,
especially when it affects the petitioner with civil
consequences, since the tax paid by him is cancelled by
Ext.P15. If there existed any sufficient reason, recognizable
in law, for recalling Ext.P13, it was for the Tahsildar to
issue notice to the petitioner, thus affording him an
opportunity of being heard, and then pass Ext.P15. To a
specific query put by this Court, the learned Government
Pleader submitted that there is no confusion, whatsoever,
with respect to Ext.P12 Order passed by the District
Collector. If that be so, the very right of the Tahsildar to
recall Ext.P13, itself, is in doubt.
8. In these circumstances, Ext.P15 will stand set aside.
The consequent cancellation of the tax receipt - leave alone
as to how it can be done - will also stand set aside. It was
submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that tax
was paid subsequently pursuant to an interim Order passed by
this Court.
9. In these circumstances, no further relief is
required, except a direction of the Village Officer to 2026:KER:28320 WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
continue to receive tax from the petitioners, subject to the
result of the Suit, which is pending between the petitioners
and the 3rd respondent.
The writ petition is allowed, as indicated above.
Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE SJ 2026:KER:28320 WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO 1770/1991 DATED 31/7/1991 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 3/8/1991 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF TAX PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 3/8/1991 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 3/11/1997 IN OS NO 142 OF 1991 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT , MANANTHAVADY Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY LAND TAX RECEIPT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF CURRENT POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF THE PROPERTY Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 17.10.2022 BY 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF REPORT DATED 20/10/2022 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 11.1.2023 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, MANANTHAVADY Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 12/6/2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/5/2024
Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO DCWYD/4089/2023-B4 DATED 19/11/2024 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO TLKMDY/2284/2022-C3 DATED 28/11/2024 ISSUED BY TAHSILDAR Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 11/12/2024 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO TLKMDY-2284/2022-C3 DATED 31/12/2024 ISSUED BY TAHSILDAR Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 18/02/2025 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL 4TH RESPONDENT VILLAGE OFFICER Exhibit P17 TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 11/09/2025 2026:KER:28320 WP(C) NO. 3986 OF 2025
TOWARDS LAND TAX FOR THE YEAR 2025-26 Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 11.09.2025 FOR POSSESSION CERTIFICATE Exhibit P19 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 18.9.2025 SUBMITTED BY VILLAGE OFFICER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 16.10.2025 ISSUE DBY TAHSILDAR TO PETITIONERS RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit-R3(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING DOCUMENT NO. 2552/2025 DATED 09-10-2025 BEFORE THE MANANTHAVADY SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!