Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arif Yaseen vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 2259 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2259 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Arif Yaseen vs State Of Kerala on 25 March, 2026

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
                                                     2026:KER:26363

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

    WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1948

                      CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

        AGAINST CC NO.177/2022 PENDING BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST
    CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MALAPPURAM IN CRIME NO.531/2021 OF
          VAZHAKKAD POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

          ARIF YASEEN,
          AGED 40 YEARS,
          S/O MOIDEEN KUTTY HAJI, CHOLAKKAL HOUSE, CHERUVATTOOR,
          KARUMARAKKAD AMSOM, VAZHAKKAD P.O, PIN - 673 640.


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.SHAHIM BIN AZIZ
          SRI.M.I.ANWAR SADATH
          SMT.ROSHINI UDAYAKUMAR
          SMT.LEENU ANANDHAN
          SRI.T.RIYAS
          SHRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.K
          SHRI.BIBIN BABU
          SMT.SUNAINA ABDULKADER
          SMT.EHLAS HALEEMA C.K.
          SHRI.FAISAL THADATHIL




RESPONDENTS/STATE/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682031.
 CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

                                 2

                                                    2026:KER:26363

     2    SHASHIKALA C.P,
          AGED 45 YEARS,
          W/O CHANDRAN, KUNNATH MAYIPOIL, MUNDUMUZHI,
          VAZHAKKAD P.O, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 673 640.


          BY SRI.M.P.PRASANTH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   25.03.2026,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

                               3

                                                 2026:KER:26363

                            ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in

C.C.No.177/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate, Malappuram, which has

originated from Crime No.531/2021 registered by the

Vazhakkad Police Station, Malappuram, alleging the

commission of offences punishable under Sections 341

and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioner has filed this Criminal

Miscellaneous Case on the assertion that, even if the

allegations in Annexure - A1 FIR and Annexure - A2

Final Report are taken on their face value, the same

would not attract the offences alleged against the

petitioner. There is no material to prove the petitioner's

culpability in the crime. The above crime has been

registered only out of the previous animosity of the 2 nd

respondent (de-facto complainant) against the CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

petitioner. Actually, the 2nd respondent's son had

wrongfully restrained the petitioner and abused him in

obscene language. It is only as a counter blast to the

said incident that the present crime has been

registered. Therefore, the proceedings may be quashed.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner

reiterates the contentions in the Crl.M.C. He submits

that even if the petitioner withstands the trial, it is not

going to lead to a conviction. Therefore, the

proceedings may be quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor seriously

opposes the Crl.M.C. He submits that the allegations in

the FIR and Final Report clearly reveal the petitioner's

culpability in the crime. The prosecution proposes to

examine eleven witnesses to establish that the CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

petitioner has committed the offences. Moreover, the

treatment records of the 2nd respondent prove that she

has suffered hurt, which would be corroborated by the

Doctor. Therefore, this Court may not embark upon a

mini-trial and hold that the petitioner has not

committed the above offences. Hence the Crl.M.C may

be dismissed.

6. The essence of the prosecution case is

that on 25.12.2021, the petitioner wrongfully restrained

the 2nd respondent, pushed and kicked her and her son

and caused hurt to them. The materials on record

clearly reveal that the 2nd respondent has suffered hurt,

which prima facie stands corroborated by the treatment

records.

7. It is well-established that this Court has

inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure to quash criminal proceedings. CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

However, such inherent power, though expansive in

nature, is not unbridled or unlimited. They are to be

exercised sparingly, with circumspection, and within

the parameters delineated by judicial precedents. One

of the elementary principles to quash a criminal

proceeding is that, the allegations in the first

information report, final report or the complaint do not

prima facie constitute any offence. (Read the decisions

in State of Haryana and others v. Bhajan Lal and others

[(1992) Supp (1) SCC 335], Central Bureau of

Investigation v. Aryan Singh and Others [(2023) 18 SCC

399], Daxaben v. State of Gujarat and Others [(2022) 16

SCC 117] and Monica Kumar and Another v. State of

U.P. and Others [(2008) 8 SCC 781].)

8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also

consistently cautioned that High Courts, while

exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code, CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

should not embark upon a "minitrial" or weigh the

sufficiency of evidence, which falls within the domain of

the Trial Court. The scope of enquiry is confined to

whether, on a plain reading of the FIR/complaint and

accompanying material, the ingredients of the alleged

offence are disclosed. (Read the decisions in Rajiv

Thapar and others v. Madal Lal Kapoor [(2013) 3 SCC

330] and HMT Watches Ltd. v. Abida M.A. and another

[(2015) 11 SCC 776]).

9. On analyzing the allegations in the FIR,

Final Report and the other materials on record,

particularly the treatment records of the 2nd

respondent, I am not satisfied that it is a fit case to

exercise inherent powers of this Court under Section

482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dismiss the Crl.

M.C, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

all his contentions before the Trial Court, including

filing an application for discharge, provided the charge

has not been framed. If such application is filed, the

Trial Court is directed to consider the application and

decide the case, in accordance with the law,

untrammelled by any observation made in this order.

The Registry is directed to communicate a copy of this

order to the Trial Court.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS JUDGE DK CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

2026:KER:26363

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 4827 OF 2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure-A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.

531/2021 DATED 28.12.2021 Annexure-A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC.NO.177/2022, OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MALAPPURAM . Annexure-A3 TRUE COPY OF THE OF THE O.P TICKET DATED 25.12.2021 ISSUED BY THE GOVT.GENERAL HOSPITAL (BEACH) AT KOZHIKODE Annexure-A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 27.12.2021, FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter