Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New Taj Enterprises vs Branch Manager South Indian Bank, ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 321 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 321 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

New Taj Enterprises vs Branch Manager South Indian Bank, ... on 14 January, 2026

                                                          2026:KER:2809



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM

   WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 24TH POUSHA, 1947

                        WP(C) NO. 41811 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

          NEW TAJ ENTERPRISES
          AGED 63 YEARS
          LOCATED AT 18/93, DOWN HILL,
          MALAPPURAM REPRESENTING THROUGH ITS DULY AUTHORIZED
          REPRESENTATIVE / LICENSEE/PROPRIETOR,
          MR P ADAM RESIDING AT PALAKKAL HOUSE,
          MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676509


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.ASHISH ANTONY FRANCIS
          SHRI.C.M.HARIKRISHNAN
          SHRI.MUHAMMAD BIN MUHAMMAD NISSAR




RESPONDENTS:

    1     BRANCH MANAGER SOUTH INDIAN BANK,
          MALAPPURAM BRANCH
          PARY SHOPPING COMPLEX, DOWNHILL,
          MALAPPURAM,
          KERALA,
          PIN - 676519

    2     THE SHO, TELEGANA CYBER SECURITY BUREAU
          2&3RD FLOOR,
          TOWER B,
          COMMAND AND CONTROL CENTRE TELANGANA POLICE,
          BHAVANI NAGAR,
          BANJARA HILLS,
          HYDERABAD,
          TELANGANA,
          PIN - 500034
                                                               2026:KER:2809
WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

                                    2


     3      THE SHO, MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION
            FEROKH PALAKKED HIGHWAY,
            ANNUNNIPARAMBU, UP HILL,
            MALAPPURAM, KERALA 676505

            (ADDL R3 MPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 15.12.2025 IN IA
            1/25 IN WP(C) 41811/25)


            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER
            SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN



OTHER PRESENT:

            SMT.K.M.RESHMI, SR.GP


     THIS   WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ORDERS   ON
14.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                         2026:KER:2809
WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

                                  3



                            JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit

freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at

the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the

Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime

registered by the Police authorities against some other

persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner

is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit

freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 &

107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)

and Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after

getting instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the lien

marked amount, as per the Requisition from the Respondent

No.2, is Rs.20,000/-, and accordingly, the Bank has effected

the same.

2026:KER:2809 WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

3. The issue is covered by the decisions of this Court in Dr. Sajeer

v. Reserve Bank of India [2024 (1) KLT 826], Nazeer K.T. v. Manager,

Federal Bank, Makkaraparamba Branch [2024 KHC 768] and Abhiraj

Rajan v. State of Kerala [2025 KHC 1676].

4. This Court has been consistently issuing the directions

contained in the aforesaid decisions with two other directions

for effecting uncommunicated/further requisitions for debit

freeze/lien and making the frozen amount at the disposal of

the jurisdictional Magistrate's Court. This Writ Petition is to be

disposed of, incorporating the same directions.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following

directions:

i) The Respondent/Bank is directed to confine the order of freeze/lien

against the account of the Petitioner only to the extent of the

amounts mentioned in the orders/requisitions issued to the Bank by

the Police Authorities, and it shall be done forthwith so as to enable 2026:KER:2809 WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

the Petitioner to deal with his account and transact therein beyond

that limit.

ii) The respondents - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed

to inform the Bank as to whether freezing/lien of the account of the

Petitioner will require to be continued even in the aforesaid manner;

and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

iii) On the Bank receiving the aforesaid information/intimation from the

Police Authorities, the Bank will adhere to it and complete necessary

action - either continuing the freeze/lien for such period as

mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

iv) If, however, no information or intimation is received by the Bank in

terms of direction (ii) above, the Petitioner will be at full liberty to

approach this Court again; for which purpose, all his contentions in

the Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to him, to impel in the

future.

2026:KER:2809 WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

v) The Police Officer concerned shall inform the Bank whether the

seizure of the Bank Account has been reported to the jurisdictional

Magistrate, and if not, the time limit within which the seizure will be

reported. If no intimation as to the compliance or the proposal to

comply with Section 102 Cr.P.C. (Section 106 BNSS) is informed to

the Bank within three months of receipt of a copy of the judgment,

the Bank shall lift the freeze/lien imposed on the Petitioner's

account.

vi) In order to enable the police to comply with the above direction, the

Bank as well as the Petitioner shall forthwith serve a copy of this

judgment to the officer concerned and retain proof of such service.

vii) The directions of this Court in this judgment will not stand in the way

of the Bank effecting freezing/lien based on the requisitions

communicated in the future to the Bank with respect to the same

account of the Petitioner, and in such case, the Petitioner will be at

liberty to challenge the same.

2026:KER:2809 WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

viii) The frozen/lien amount, if any, lying in the account of the Petitioner

in accordance with the aforementioned directions, shall be at the

disposal of the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms 2026:KER:2809 WP(C) No.41811 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 41811 OF 2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF LICENSE DATED 27.05.2024 ISSUED FROM MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER'S COMPANY ACCOUNT IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2023 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST ACCOUNT STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF A NOTICE DATED 12.09.2025 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION EMAIL DATED 09.10.2025 SENT TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BANK Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RULING PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN NAZEER K.T.V. MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK, MAKKARAPARAMBA BRANCH REPORTED IN 2024 KHC ONLINE 768

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter