Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sajeesh vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 1825 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1825 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sajeesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 February, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
                                               2026:KER:15142




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

 THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 30TH MAGHA, 1947

                BAIL APPL. NO. 14524 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.1095/2025 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD

  AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2025 IN CRMC NO.5043 OF

   2025 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT / RENT CONTROL

               APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:

         SAJEESH
         AGED 45 YEARS
         S/O VELAYUDHAN KAILASAM, PERINCHOLAM MANNARKKAD
         POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678582.

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.S.RAJEEV
         SRI.V.VINAY
         SRI.M.S.ANEER
         SHRI.SARATH K.P.
         SHRI.ANILKUMAR C.R.
         SHRI.K.S.KIRAN KRISHNAN
         SMT.DIPA V.
         SHRI.AZAD SUNIL
         SHRI.T.P.ARAVIND
         SMT.AKSHARA S.
         SHRI.MAHESWAR PADICKAL
RESPONDENTS/STATE:

    1    STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
         KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031.

    2    STATION HOUSE OFFICER
 B.A.Nos.14496 &
14524 OF 2025
                             2
                                             2026:KER:15142



         MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
         PIN - 678582.



         SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.02.2026, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..14496/2025, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A.Nos.14496 &
14524 OF 2025
                               3
                                                  2026:KER:15142




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

 THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 30TH MAGHA, 1947

                  BAIL APPL. NO. 14496 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.1095/2025 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD

      AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.12.2025 IN CRMC NO.5059 OF

   2025 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT / RENT CONTROL

                  APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD

PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED:

         NISHA.C
         AGED 39 YEARS
         CHERIKKALLIMMEL, THIRUVAZHAIYODE, PALAKKAD
         DISTRICT, PIN - 679514.

         BY ADVS.
         SHRI.T.K.SANDEEP
         SMT.RESHMA VISWANATHAN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

         STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
         KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

         SRI.NOUSHAD K.A., SR. PP


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.02.2026, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..14524/2025, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A.Nos.14496 &
14524 OF 2025
                                  4
                                                  2026:KER:15142



                            ORDER

These applications are filed under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS),

seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.2 and 3 in

Crime No.1095/2025 of Mannarkkad Police Station, Palakkad

District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections

335(A)(i), 340(2), 318(3), 316(2), 316(4), 316(5), 318(4), 336(3)

and 338 r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the

accused No.1 who is the Secretary of the Mannarkkad Co-

operative Urban Credit society, with the help of applicant Nos.2

and 3 who are the clerks of the said society committed fraud by

showing that loans were given to the depositors of the society by

forging the documents and through that, without returning the

amount after the expiry of the deposits, committed breach of trust

and cheated the society without producing the amount of

Rs.1,73,40,343/- during the investigation. Thus the applicants

committed the offences alleged.

4. I have heard Sri.S.Rajeev and Sri.T.K.Sandeep,

the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.C. Ashi and B.A.Nos.14496 & 14524 OF 2025

2026:KER:15142

Sri.K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutors. Perused

the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted

that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated

in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no

materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged

crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. The learned Public

Prosecutors, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged

incident occurred as part of the applicants' intentional criminal

acts, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the

course of the investigation.

6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of pre-

arrest bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be granted as a

matter of course. The power under Section 482 of BNSS could be

exercised only when a special case is made out, that too,

recording reasons thereof. Perusal of the case diary reveals that

the accusation made against the applicants is very serious in

nature, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on

their part. The applicants were working as clerks of the society

during the relevant period. The accused No.1 is the Secretary. The

allegation is that accused No.1 committed misappropriation with

the help of the applicants. The misappropriated amount involved B.A.Nos.14496 & 14524 OF 2025

2026:KER:15142

is huge. Considering the facts and circumstances, the applicants

have to be interrogated.

7. The investigation is in a preliminary stage. The custodial

interrogation of the applicants is necessary for the investigation.

As rightly argued by the learned Public Prosecutors, the possibility

of the applicants influencing the witnesses and interfering with

the investigation cannot be ruled out if they are released on bail.

Considering the gravity of the offence and stage of the

investigation, I am of the view that this is not a fit case where the

extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court under Section 482

of BNSS could be invoked.

The bail applications are, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

mea B.A.Nos.14496 & 14524 OF 2025

2026:KER:15142

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 14524 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure I THE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO 1095/2025 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION DATED 02.12.2025 Annexure II A COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02.12.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SESSIONS, PALAKKAD DISTRICT IN CRL. MC 5043/2025 B.A.Nos.14496 & 14524 OF 2025

2026:KER:15142

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 14496 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME 1095/2025 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION DATED 12.10.2025 Annexure-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER IN CRL.M.C 5059/2025 DATED 02.12.2025 PASSED BY SESSIONS COURT PALAKKAD DIVISION

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter