Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Naushad A.M vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 9065 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9065 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025

Kerala High Court

Naushad A.M vs State Of Kerala on 23 September, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
                                               2025:KER:70784

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

 TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 / 1ST ASWINA, 1947

                BAIL APPL. NO. 11840 OF 2025

    CRIME NO.10/2025 OF PERUMBAVOOR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,

                         ERNAKULAM

      AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.1035 OF 2025

    OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT/RENT CONTROL

             APPELLATE AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

         NAUSHAD A.M,
         AGED 42 YEARS
         S/O MUSTHAFA, AALANGADAN VEETTIL, PALLIPPURAM
         KARA, MARAMPILLY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.,
         PIN - 683105.

         BY ADV SRI.AJEESH M UMMER
RESPONDENT/STATE:

         STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
         KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031.

         SMT. SREEJA V., PP


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.09.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A.NO. 11840 OF 2025             2


                                                       2025:KER:70784

                   BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                  ...............................................
                      B.A.No. 11840 of 2025
                  ...............................................
            Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2025

                                ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.10/2025 of Excise

Range Office, Perumbavoor, registered alleging offences punishable

under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 60(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS' Act').

3. According to the prosecution, the accused was found in

possession of 6.300 Kg of ganja from an autorickshaw, and thereafter,

another 14 Kg of ganja was seized from his house. Altogether, 20.300

Kg of ganja was seized, and thereby the accused committed the

offences alleged. Petitioner was arrested on 29.01.2025 and he has

been in custody since then.

4. Sri.Ajeesh M. Ummer, the learned counsel for the petitioner,

pointed out that the entire prosecution allegations are false and that

serious manipulations have been committed by the Investigating Officer

to implicate the petitioner as an accused. It was submitted that the

arrest memo indicates that petitioner was arrested on 29.01.2025 at

07:55 pm, for illegal possession of 20.300 Kg of dried ganja, while

2025:KER:70784

Annexure 10, the seizure mahazar prepared at 08:00 pm, indicated

only a quantity of 6.300 Kg of ganja. The learned counsel further

pointed out that it was only subsequently, as per Annexure 11,

mahazar, that the quantity of 14 Kg of ganja was seized from

petitioner's house, and therefore, the arrest memo contains

manipulations and fraudulent incorporation. The learned counsel also

submitted that the crime was registered only on 30.01.2025, which

also indicates the manipulations committed by the Investigating Officer.

The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner ought to be

released on bail considering the above anomalies.

5. Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor, on the other

hand, opposed the application and submitted that the allegations are

serious and that petitioner was found to be in possession of commercial

quantity of ganja, and therefore, the rigour under Section 37 of NDPS

Act would apply.

6. On a perusal of Annexure A8, arrest memo, it is noticed that

the petitioner is stated to have been arrested at 07.55 pm on

29.01.2025 for illegal possession of 20.300 Kg of dried ganja. However,

in Annexure 10, seizure mahazar, which was prepared immediately

after the arrest of the petitioner i.e., at 08.00 pm, it is mentioned that

petitioner was found in possession of 6.300 Kg of ganja. Annexure 11

relates to seizure of 14 Kg of ganja allegedly seized from the

petitioner's house. The said mahazar indicates that the seizure was

2025:KER:70784

effected from the house of the petitioner at at 09.15 pm.

7. On a perusal of the above documents, which are not

disputed, it is evident that the reference in the arrest memo, seizure of

commercial quantity of contraband (20.300 Kg of dried ganja) at 07.55

pm on 29.01.2025 is incorrect. Prima facie, there are reasons to

assume that there have been manipulations or subsequent creation of

records. In such circumstances, the possibility of the petitioner being

found to be guilty cannot arise at this juncture atleast. Further,

petitioner is not involved in any other crime as well. Moreover, final

report has also been filed. In such circumstances, I am of the view that

petitioner can be released on bail.

8. In the result, this application is allowed on the following

conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

2025:KER:70784

In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any

modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the jurisdictional

Court shall be empowered to consider such applications, if any, and

pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding

the bail having been granted by this Court.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

mea

2025:KER:70784

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 11840/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 A TREATMENT SUMMARY OF SREE NARAYANA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, CHALAKKA, ERNAKULAM DATED 25/08/2025 Annexure 2 A COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P 346/2025 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 08.08.2025 Annexure-3 A COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P 362/2025 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 12.08.2025 Annexure 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECALL NOTICE ISSUED BY THE BANK DATED 18.08.2025 WITH REFERENCE NO MLY/SM/CR/25-26/45 Annexure 5 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECALL NOTICE ISSUED BY THE BANK DATED 18.08.2025 WITH REFERENCE NO MLY/SM/CR/25-26/46 Annexure 6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECALL NOTICE ISSUED BY THE BANK DATED 18.08.2025 WITH REFERENCE NO MLY/SM/CR/25-26/47 Annexure-7 A COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P 397/2025 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 08.09.2025 Annexure-8 A COPY OF THE ARREST MEMO DATED 29/01/2025 Annexure-9 A COPY OF THE INSPECTION MEMO DATED 29/01/2025 Annexure-10 A TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 29.01.2025 AT 08.00 PM Annexure-11 A TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 29.01.2025 AT 09.15 PM Annexure-12 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN BA 8833/2025 DATED 28.07.202

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter