Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Zeenath Rahman vs Deputy Collector (R.R)/Rdo Thrissur
2025 Latest Caselaw 9795 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9795 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Zeenath Rahman vs Deputy Collector (R.R)/Rdo Thrissur on 16 October, 2025

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
  W.P.(C) No. 38246 of 2025




                                       1
                                                        2025:KER:77190

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 24TH ASWINA, 1947

                              WP(C) NO. 38246 OF 2025

  PETITIONER(S):

               ZEENATH RAHMAN
               AGED 45 YEARS
               D/O. ABDUL RAHMAN, PEDIKATTU HOUSE, 1/1106,
               PADAMUGAL, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
               KERALA,           PIN - 682030


               BY ADVS.
               SHRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR
               SMT.P.K.MINIMOLE
               SHRI.A.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
               SHRI.BAPPU GALIB SALAM
               SHRI.G.MOTILAL
               SMT.SUVARNAKUMARI P.




  RESPONDENT(S):

        1      DEPUTY COLLECTOR (R.R)/RDO THRISSUR
               FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL LINES RD,
               KALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN
               - 680003

        2      LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
               BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, THE
               AGRICULTURAL OFFICER PUTHUR, KRISHI BHAVAN,
               THRISSUR MANNAMANGALAM RD, PUTHUR, THRISSUR,
               KERALA,                          PIN - 680014
 W.P.(C) No. 38246 of 2025




                                       2
                                                              2025:KER:77190


      3          AGRICULTURAL OFFICER PUTHUR
                 KRISHI BHAVAN, THRISSUR MANNAMANGALAM RD,
                 PUTHUR, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680014


                 BY ADV.
                 GP, SMT. DEEPA V

          THIS    WRIT      PETITION   (CIVIL)      HAVING     COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION         ON   16.10.2025,         THE   COURT   ON   THE     SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No. 38246 of 2025




                                    3
                                                         2025:KER:77190


                        P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                 ---------------------------------------------
                      W.P.(C) No. 38246 of 2025
             ------------------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 16th day of October, 2025.


                                JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following

reliefs:

"i. Call for the records relating to Ext. P4 order of the 1st Respondent Dy. Collector (R.R)/RDO Thrissur and to quash the same order by issuing a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writs, Orders or Directions .

ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction the 1 st Respondent Dy. Collector (R.R)/RDO Thrissur to reconsider Ext. P3 application in Form 5 afresh, after obtaining the necessary reports including Satellite reports from the KSREC, and after conducting physical inspection of the property in person; and allow the said application, by passing appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, after taking into consideration the ground realities, and after hearing the Petitioner.

iii. Declare that the property of the Petitioner having a total extent of 19.19 Ares of property, split up into 2 extents of 18.62 Ares comprised in Re-Sy. No. 15/10; and 0.57 Ares comprised in Re-Sy. No. 16/117 situated at Block 072 of Marathaakkara Village, Thrissur Taluk in Thrissur District, covered by Ext. P3 application is dry/garden land, having all the characterisation of

2025:KER:77190

Purayidam and therefore the inclusion of 19.19 Ares of the property in the data bank is liable to be excluded.

iv. Issue such other and further writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

v. Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents"[SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed

by the 1st respondent rejecting Form - 5 application

submitted by her under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy

Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 ('Rules', for brevity). The

main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised

officer has not considered the contentions of the

petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am

of the considered opinion that the authorised officer has

failed to comply the statutory requirements. The

impugned order is passed by the authorised officer solely

based on the report of the Agricultural Officer. There is

2025:KER:77190

no indication in the order that the authorised officer has

directly inspected the property or called for the satellite

pictures as mandated under Rule 4(4f) of the Rules.

There is no independent finding regarding the nature and

character of the land as on the relevant date by the

authorised officer. Moreover, the authorised officer has

not considered whether the exclusion of the property

would prejudicially affect the surrounding paddy fields.

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v.

Revenue Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524],

Sudheesh U v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386], and Joy K.K. v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector,

Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT 433], observed that the

competent authority is obliged to assess the nature, lie

and character of the land and its suitability for paddy

cultivation as on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive

criteria to determine whether the property merits

exclusion from the data bank. The impugned order is not

in accordance with the principle laid down by this Court

2025:KER:77190

in the above judgments. Therefore, I am of the

considered opinion that the impugned order is to be set

aside.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in the

following manner:

1. Ext.P4 order is set aside.

2. The 1st respondent/authorised officer is

directed to reconsider Ext.P3 Form - 5

application submitted by the petitioner in

accordance with law. The authorised

officer shall either conduct a personal

inspection of the property or,

alternatively, call for the satellite

pictures, in accordance with Rule 4(4f) of

the Rules, at the cost of the petitioner.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the

application shall be disposed of within

three months from the date of receipt of

such pictures. On the other hand, if the

authorised officer opts to personally

2025:KER:77190

inspect the property, the application shall

be considered and disposed of within two

months from the date of production of a

copy of this judgment by the petitioner.

Sd/-

                                           P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,
                                                  JUDGE
DM

Judgment reserved            NA
Date of Judgment          16.10.2025
Judgment dictated         16.10.2025
Draft Judgment placed     17.10.2025

Final Judgment uploaded 18.10.2025

2025:KER:77190

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38246/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 09.12.2024 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.

437/I/08 DATED 21.01.2008 OF SRO KUTTANALLUR EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM-5 HAVING FILE NO. 100/2025/29020 DATED 26.07.2025 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN FILE NO.

4311/2025 DATED 25.09.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter