Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Eshack A vs The District Collector,Palakkad
2025 Latest Caselaw 9713 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9713 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Eshack A vs The District Collector,Palakkad on 15 October, 2025

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
WP(C) NO. 4962 OF 2025               1

                                                       2025:KER:76746

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

     WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 23RD ASWINA, 1947

                         WP(C) NO. 4962 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

             ESHACK A,
             AGED 55 YEARS
             S/O.ABDUL ASEEZ, OTTUPURACKAL HOUSE, KUNNAMPARAMBU,
             ALATHUR.P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541


             BY ADV SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)


RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PALAKKAD,
             COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     2       REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
             COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     3       THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.A),
             R.D.O, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.A), CIVIL
             STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     4       THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
             OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,CIVIL
             STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     5       THE THAHSILDAR (L.R),
             ,ALATHUR TALUK OFFICE,ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541

     6       THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
             ALATHUR VILLAGE, ALATHUR.P.O, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD,
             PIN - 678541

     7       THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
             KRISHIBHAVAN, ALATHUR.P.O, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678541
 WP(C) NO. 4962 OF 2025                   2

                                                                2025:KER:76746


     8       LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
             ALATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT,ALATHURI.P.O, ALATHUR TALUK,
             PALAKKAD, REP.BY ITS CONVENER, PIN - 678541


             GP SMT JESSY S SALIM


      THIS   WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)       HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON
15.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 4962 OF 2025                          3

                                                                          2025:KER:76746

                          P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                    ---------------------------------------------
                          WP(C) NO. 4962 OF 2025
                ------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 15th day of October, 2025.


                                     JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

"i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction and quash Ext.P9, Order dated 12.11.2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent.

ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction and direct the 2nd respondent to delete the petitioner's property comprised in Re.Sy.No.402/39 (402/7) in Block No.28 of Alathur Village, Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District having an extent of 0.0290 Hectare.

iii) It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may dispense the production of English Translation of the documents produced in the above W.P.(c) and Petitioner undertakes to produce the same as and when required by this Hon'ble Court.

And

iv) Issue such other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case so as to secure the ends of justice."

[SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9 order passed by

the 3rd respondent rejecting Ext.P8 Form - 5 application submitted by

2025:KER:76746

him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules,

2008 ('Rules', for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that

the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the

petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the

considered opinion that the authorised officer has failed to comply the

statutory requirements. The impugned order is passed by the authorised

officer solely based on the report of the Agricultural Officer. There is no

indication in the order that the authorised officer has directly inspected

the property or called for the satellite pictures as mandated under Rule

4(4f) of the Rules. There is no independent finding regarding the nature

and character of the land as on the relevant date by the authorised

officer. Moreover, the authorised officer has not considered whether the

exclusion of the property would prejudicially affect the surrounding

paddy fields.

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v. Revenue

Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524], Sudheesh U v. The Revenue

Divisional Officer, Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386], and Joy K.K. v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT

433], observed that the competent authority is obliged to assess the

2025:KER:76746

nature, lie and character of the land and its suitability for paddy

cultivation as on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive criteria to determine

whether the property merits exclusion from the data bank. The impugned

order is not in accordance with the principle laid down by this Court in

the above judgments. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the

impugned order is to be set aside.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in the following manner:

1. Ext.P9 order is set aside.

2. The 2nd respondent/authorised officer is directed to reconsider Ext.P8 Form - 5 application in accordance with law. The authorised officer shall either conduct a personal inspection of the property or, alternatively, call for the satellite pictures, in accordance with Rule 4(4f) of the Rules, at the cost of the petitioner.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the application shall be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of such pictures. On the other hand, if the authorised officer opts to personally inspect the property, the application shall be considered and disposed of within two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner.

Sd/-

                                                      P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
                                                            JUDGE
     AJ

     Judgment reserved          NA
     Date of Judgment           15.10.2025
     Draft judgment placed      15.10.2025
     Final Judgment uploaded    16.10.2025


                                                             2025:KER:76746




                         APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4962/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1       TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE               DATED

30.08.2024 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENTS NO.2207/I/2018 OF SRO, ALATHUR DATED 09.07.2018

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY 6TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT NO.115/07-08 DATED 27.07.2007 ISSUED FROM THE ALATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERHIP CERTIFICATE DATED 03.12.2024 ISSUED BY ALATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY

Exhibit P7 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION DATED 15.12.2023

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN FILE NO.222/2024 DATED 12.11.2024 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter