Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

John Anto vs Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 6314 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6314 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2025

Kerala High Court

John Anto vs Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd on 27 May, 2025

Author: N.Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
                                               2025:KER:37086

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

  TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                    WP(C) NO. 17796 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

         JOHN ANTO,
         AGED 28 YEARS,
         S/O K O ANTO, KALLARAKAL HOUSE,
         CHANGAPUZHA PARK, EDAPALLY,
         ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682033

         BY ADV.JOSE ANTONY


RESPONDENTS:

    1    KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD.,
         PALAKKAD 2ND BRANCH, SIVASAKTHI BUILDING,
         COCHIN DEVASOM BOARD, ROUND NORTH,
         THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER,
         PIN - 680001

    2    DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR),
         KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES HEAD OFFICE,
         CHENBUKKAV, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003

         BY ADV.
         SRI. P.C. ANIL KUMAR, SC

     THIS WRIT PETITION       (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP     FOR
ADMISSION ON 27.05.2025,      THE COURT ON THE SAME      DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                          2025:KER:37086
W.P.(C) No.17796/2025
                                  :2:




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 27th day of May, 2025

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by

the coercive proceedings for recovery of chitty amounts due to

the 1st respondent from the petitioner, invoking the provisions of

the Revenue Recovery Act.

2. The petitioner availed three chitties from the

1st respondent for an amount of ₹25,00,000/-. The petitioner

states that though the petitioner made remittances promptly

during the initial repayment period, he could not pay the

subscriptions promptly later. The repayment of amounts fell into

arrears later. It happened due to reasons beyond the control of

the petitioner.

2025:KER:37086

3. Though the petitioner requested the 1st

respondent to permit the petitioner to repay the outstanding

amounts in easy monthly instalments, the respondents were not

yielding. The authorities, instead, started coercive proceedings,

invoking the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act and

issued Exts.P1 to P4 notices.

4. The petitioner states that he is still in a position

to clear the outstanding amounts towards the chitties, if

sufficient time is given to clear the dues in easy monthly

instalments. If the respondents are permitted to continue with

the coercive proceedings and auction the secured assets

provided by the petitioner, he will be put to untold hardship and

loss.

5. Standing Counsel entered appearance on

behalf of the 1st respondent and denied all the statements made

by the petitioner. The petitioner committed default in repaying 2025:KER:37086

the chitty amount.

6. The respondents repeatedly reminded the

petitioner and required him to clear the dues. The petitioner

deliberately omitted to do so. In the circumstances, the

respondents had no other go, than to proceed against the

petitioner invoking the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act.

The impugned Exts.P1 to P4 notices were issued in these

circumstances. The petitioner has not advanced any legal

reasons to thwart the coercive proceedings initiated by the

respondents.

7. The Standing Counsel, however, submitted

that if the petitioner is ready and willing to make a substantial

payment soon and remit the balance outstanding amount

immediately thereafter, a short breathing time can be granted to

the petitioner to clear the dues. The Standing Counsel

submitted that the outstanding amount due to the 1 st respondent 2025:KER:37086

from the petitioner as on 31.05.2025 is ₹49,96,462/-.

8. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and

the Standing Counsel representing the 1st respondent. I have

also heard the Government Pleader representing the 2 nd

respondent.

9. The specific case of the petitioner is that the

petitioner has been making the repayment and maintaining the

chitty account initially. The default in repayment of money

occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the

petitioner. The petitioner has provided substantial security which

will safeguard the interest of the respondents.

10. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I

am inclined to dispose of the writ petition giving a short and

reasonable time to the petitioner to clear off the liability.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of permitting the

petitioner to clear to outstanding amount of ₹49,96,462/- ( as on 2025:KER:37086

31.05.2025) along with accruing interest and other charges, if

any, in 20 equal monthly installments. First of such installments

shall be paid on or before 27.06.2025. If the petitioner commits

any default in making the remittances as directed above, the

respondents will be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in

accordance with law. If the petitioner pays the amount as

directed above, any coercive proceedings against the petitioner

will stand deferred.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR 2025:KER:37086

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17796/2025

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1              TRUE     COPY      OF     THE     NOTICE
                        NO.168/114/2019-12    DATED   22.06.2023
                        ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO MOOZA

Exhibit P2              TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.102/2019-31
                        DATED 10.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST
                        RESPONDENT TO ONE MOOZA

Exhibit P3              TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.103/2019-4
                        DATED 10.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST
                        RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

Exhibit P4              TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.9016/24-25
                        DATED 27.11.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND
                        RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter