Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prajna R vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 175 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 175 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2025

Kerala High Court

Prajna R vs State Of Kerala on 13 May, 2025

Author: N. Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
                                          2025:KER:33526


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

 TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 23RD VAISAKHA, 1947

                WP(C) NO. 29514 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

         PRAJNA R
         AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. SANTHOSHAN P
         UPST, POYILKAVU UP SCHOOL POST EDAKULAM,
         KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673306.


         BY ADVS.
         R.K.MURALEEDHARAN
         ATHIRA A.MENON
         HARISANKAR.K.V.




RESPONDENTS:

    1    STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GENERAL
         EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.

    2    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
         OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
         KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673004.

    3    THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
         OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
         KOYILANDI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673305.
                                            2025:KER:33526
W.P.(C) No.29514/2024
                               :2:


    4     THE MANAGER
          POYILKAVU UP SCHOOL, POST EDAKULAM,
          KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
          PIN - 673306.

    5     JITHIN
          HST(ENGLISH), THIRUVANGOOR HIGHER SECONDARY
          SCHOOL THIRUVANGOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
          PIN - 678304.

 ADDL.R6 THE HEADMISTRESS,
         POYILKAVU UP SCHOOL, POYILKAVU, EDAKULAM P O,
         KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673306

          [ADDITIONAL 6TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER
          ORDER DATED 21.02.2025 IN IA 1/2025]


          BY ADV.SRI.V.VENUGOPAL, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 14.03.2025, THE COURT ON 13.05.2025
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                2025:KER:33526
W.P.(C) No.29514/2024
                                            :3:




                           N. NAGARESH, J.

          `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                      W.P.(C) No.29514 of 2024

          `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                Dated this the 13th day of May, 2025


                            JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

The petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P4 Staff Fixation

Order to the extent it retrenches the petitioner. The petitioner

also seeks to direct respondents 2 and 3 to accommodate

the petitioner in the HTV Vacancy from 15.07.2024 onwards

after recalling the 5th respondent.

2. The petitioner was appointed as UPST in

the 4th respondent's School with effect from 15.07.2021,

against a retirement vacancy. Her appointment was

provisionally approved as per Ext.P2 order, subject to the 2025:KER:33526

claims of PwD candidates. In the year 2023-2024, due to

want of building accommodation, one post of UPST was

reduced. However, the petitioner continued in the School,

drawing salary.

3. In the year 2024-2025, the petitioner was

ordered to be retrenched. The 4th respondent-Manager was

required to appoint a protected Teacher in the HTV vacancy.

The Manager informed the 3rd respondent-AEO that the

petitioner is a Rule 51A claimant and therefore entitled to

protection in the HTV vacancy. The Manager requested the

2nd respondent-DDE to set right the illegality in retrenching

the petitioner. The 2nd respondent, however, issued order

deploying the 5th respondent to the HTV vacancy.

4. The petitioner states that she is a protected

Teacher under the same educational agency, whereas the 5 th

respondent is an approved HST from another educational 2025:KER:33526

agency. The 5th respondent could not have been deployed in

preference to the superior claim of the petitioner. Rule 7

Chapter XXI KER also protects the right of a Rule 51A

claimant. Therefore, Ext.P4 is liable to be set aside to the

extent of retrenching the petitioner.

5. The 3rd respondent opposed the writ

petition. The 3rd respondent stated that Ext.P2 approval

given to the initial appointment of the petitioner was

provisional and conditional. Therefore, when there occurred

a reduction of post of UPST in the year 2024-2025, the

petitioner could not have been taken as a Rule 51A claimant.

HTV vacancy can be filled up only in accordance with Rule 7

Chapter XXI KER from among the list of protected Teachers

maintained by the Department.

6. The Manager has not provided reservation

to the Physically disabled Persons as required under 2025:KER:33526

Government Orders. The Manager has not submitted the

roster nor the requisitions seeking the list of persons with

disabilities from the Special Employment Exchange.

Therefore, the petitioner cannot be deployed to the HTV

vacancy which should be filled up by a protected hand. The

deployment of the 5th respondent is therefore justified.

7. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader

representing the respondents.

8. The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 Staff

Fixation Order to the extent of retrenching the petitioner. The

petitioner states that she is a Rule 51A claimant and has a

superior right over protected Teachers. The petitioner was, in

fact, appointed as UPST with effect from 15.07.2021 and

continued till 15.07.2024. The appointment of the petitioner

was approved as per Ext.P2 order dated 27.11.2023. Ext.P2 2025:KER:33526

approval order provided that the approval is provisional and

the probation of the petitioner shall not be declared nor the

annual increments granted. The approval is limited to the

date on which PwD candidates join service.

9. As the approval of the petitioner's

appointment is stated to be temporary in Ext.P2 and as it is

with a specific direction not to declare probation and not to

grant increments, the approval cannot be treated as one

subsequently giving rise to a Rule 51A claim. The Manager

has not provided roster for appointment of PwD candidates.

The Manager has not produced requisition seeking

nomination of PwD candidates from the Special Employment

Exchange.

10. In the afore facts of the case, I am not

inclined to hold that the approval granted to the initial

appointment given to the petitioner is absolute. Such a 2025:KER:33526

provisional appointment cannot give rise to a Rule 51A claim

subsequently, unless the appointment is regularised. There

is no illegality in deploying a protected Teacher to the School.

The writ petition is therefore without any

merit and it is dismissed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/24.04.2025 2025:KER:33526

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29514/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER AS UPST DATED 15.07.2021

Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C-

120709/2021 DATED 27.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES STAFF FIXATION ORDER NO. D.DIS C/62143/2023 OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2023-24 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 23.08.2023

Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER NO. D.DIS C/742699/2024 OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2024-25 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 15.07.2024

Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 15.07.2024

Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 16/2024 DATED 15.07.2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.07.2024

Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 19.07.2024 2025:KER:33526

Exhibit-P9 TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.

2/2023/G.EDN ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT DATED 23.01.2023

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.02.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter