Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 140 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2025
2025:KER:33637
WP(Crl.).No.552/25 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 19TH VAISAKHA, 1947
WP(CRL.) NO. 552 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
SASIDHARAN M.K.,
AGED 71 YEARS,
S/O.KALIKUTTY, SAJI BHAVANAM, VENMONY P.O.,
VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT, PIN - 689 509.
BY ADVS.
AJITH MURALI
MOHANAN M.K.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE/THE DISTRICT POLICE
CHIEF, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688 012.
3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
VENMONY POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN - 689 509.
2025:KER:33637
WP(Crl.).No.552/25 2
4 SUJITH E.J.,
EDIVETTEYATHU, VENMONY P.O., VENMONY VILLAGE,
CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN - 689 509.
SRI.K.P.HARISH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 09.05.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:33637
WP(Crl.).No.552/25 3
JUDGMENT
Ziyad Rahman A.A.,J
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner seeking
the following reliefs:
"i) To issue a writ of Habeas corpus commanding the respondents 2 to 4 to produce the petitioner's daughter-in-law, Vidhya Reghunathan before this Hon'ble Court, forthwith;
ii) To issue such other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to handover the custody of the petitioner's daughter-in-law, Vidhya Reghunathan to the petitioner immediately;
iii) To issue such other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to secure the ends of justice to the facts and circumstances of this case and
iv) To dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language.
2. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that,
the daughter-in-law of the petitioner is in the illegal custody of
the 4th respondent herein. According to the petitioner, the
alleged detenue was induced by the 4 th respondent to leave the 2025:KER:33637
residence, abandoning two of her children from 10.09.2024.
This writ petition was submitted in such circumstances. As the
3rd respondent failed to take prompt action on the complaint
submitted by the petitioner in this regard and as the son of the
petitioner, who is the husband of the detenue, is abroad, this
writ petition was submitted by the petitioner.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for
consideration, the alleged detenue appeared before this Court.
We interacted with the alleged detenue in person, during the
course of which, she asserted that, she left the matrimonial
home voluntarily and without any compulsion. She asserted
that, she is not in any illegal detention under the 4 th respondent.
4. We interacted with the petitioner as well. After
considering all the relevant aspects and taking note of the
assertions made by the alleged detenue, we are of the view that
there is no scope for granting the reliefs sought in this writ
petition, as evidently, the alleged detenue has left the
matrimonial house on her own volition and therefore, it cannot
be held that she is under any illegal detention.
2025:KER:33637
In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed
without prejudice to the rights of the parties with regard to the
custody of the children who are now with the petitioner.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE
Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE DG/9.5.25 2025:KER:33637
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 552/2025
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27.10.2024.
Exhibit-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.10.2024.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!