Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5486 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2025
O.P.(C)No.1289/2016
1
2025:KER:25430
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. KRISHNA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947
OP(C) NO. 1289 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.1.2016 IN I.A.NO.5227/2015 IN
OS NO.845 OF 2012 OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS:
1 P.K.VENU
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O.LATE KOCHOL, PULAVATHIL HOUSE, KOPPARAMBU, EROOR,
NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2 ANILKUMAR
AGED 30, S/O.P.K.VENU, PULAVATHIL HOUSE, KOPPARAMBU,
EROOR, NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT.
3 ANOOP P.V.
AGED 23, S/O.P.K.VENU, PULAVATHIL HOUSE, KOPPARAMBU,
EROOR, NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
SMT.SEENU SADIQUE
RESPONDENTS:
1 KRISHNAN
AGED ABOUT 70, S/O.LATE KUMARAN, KOTTAPURATH HOUSE,
TRIPUNITHURA P.O., NADAMA DESOM, NADAMA VILLAGE,
KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 301.
O.P.(C)No.1289/2016
2
2025:KER:25430
2 VASU
AGED 65 YEARS
S/O.LATE KUMARAN, KOTTAPURATH HOUSE, TRIPUNITHURA
P.O., NADAMA DESOM, NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 301. (DIED)
3 SUNILKUMAR, AGED 35, S/O.VASU
KOTTAPURATH HOUSE, TRIPUNITHURA P.O., NADAMA DESOM,
NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 301.
4 AJITHA AGED 26 DO.P.K.VENU
PULAVATHIL HOUSE, KOPPARAMBU, EROOR, NADAMA VILLAGE,
KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT -682 303.
ADDL.R5 THANKAMMA
AGED 62 YEARS
W/O LATE VASU, KOTTAPPURATH HOUSE, TRIPUNITHURA P.O,
NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
ADDL.R6 INDULEKHA
AGED 41 YEARS
D/O LATE VASU, KOTTAPPURATH HOUSE, TRIPUNITHURA P.O,
NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
(ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER
ORDER DATED 03/01/2017 IN IA.NO.1653/2016)
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 25.03.2025,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O.P.(C)No.1289/2016
3
2025:KER:25430
JUDGMENT
The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs before
the Principal Sub Court, Ernakulam. They filed a
petition to summon the Tahsildar, Kanayannur Taluk for
proving Exts.P5 to P13 documents issued from his
office. Those documents were issued to the plaintiffs
when they applied for copies of the same under the
Right to Information Act.
2. Instead of producing the documents in
compliance of the summons, the Tahasildar filed Ext.P15
affidavit stating that the original documents were
misplaced and he could produce them only if they are
traced out. Then the plaintiffs filed Exts.P16 and P17
applications for recalling the 1st plaintiff for proving
those records, and to direct the Tahasildar to
reconstruct the relevant missing file, on the basis of
available documents. These applications were rejected
2025:KER:25430
by the trial court as per Ext.P19 and P20 orders. The
present petition is preferred to challenge the said
orders.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for
the petitioners.
4. It is evident from the records that the
petitioners obtained Exts.P6 to P13 documents as per
Ext.P5 letter issued by the State Public Information
Officer and Additional Tahsildar, Kanayannur Taluk. If
that be so, even if the original is not traceable from
the office of the Tahsildar, the official who issued
Ext.P5 letter can vouch for the genuineness of Exts.P6
to P13 documents. It is thus just and proper to permit
the petitioners to examine the said officer to prove
those documents.
5. The petitioners attempted to recall and
re-examine the first petitioner himself to prove those
documents, but it was dismissed by the learned Sub
Judge, as per Ext.P20 order. If the petitioners are not
able to bring the author of Ext.P5, they can be
2025:KER:25430
permitted to re-examine the 1st petitioner, but marking
of the photocopies of the document will be done subject
to the law applicable in that regard.
6. This original petition is filed in the
year 2016. Considering the passage of time and the
nature of the suit as well as the evidence sought to be
produced by the petitioners, I am of the view that this
original petition can be disposed of with the following
directions:
i)The learned Sub Judge shall give sufficient
opportunity to the petitioners to summon the officials
of Kanayannur Taluk to produce the original of the
records or atleast to prove the genuineness of Exts.P5
to P13 documents. If the officer who issued Ext.P5
letter is not available in that office now, the
petitioners may be given sufficient opportunity to
summon him or atleast the person who is in charge of
that seat at present.
ii) The petitioners may also be permitted to
recall and re-examine the first petitioner and to
2025:KER:25430
attempt to prove the photocopies of the above
documents, if the situation so warrants, subject to the
law applicable in that regard.
Sd/-
P. KRISHNA KUMAR JUDGE sv
2025:KER:25430
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1289/2016
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXT.P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 1ST DEFENDANT
EXT.P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATMENT FILED BY THE 2ND DEFENDANT
EXT.P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (INAM SETTLEMENT OFFICER), KOTTAYAM.
EXT.P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17.10.2012 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, TALUK OFFICE, KAYANNUR TALUK.
EXT.P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE FORM OF PATTA
EXT.P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE INDIVIDUAL NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT SUPPLIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
EXT.P8 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE FORM NO.3 PUBLIC NOTICE SUPPLIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
EXT.P9 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE REVENUE INSPECTOR ISSUED IN SMP NO.400/95, WHICH IS SUPPLIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
EXT.P10 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE SETTLEMENT REGISTER SUPPLIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER.
2025:KER:25430
EXT.P11 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE VILLAGE OFFICER, WHICH IS SUPPLIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
EXT.P12 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.06.1995 ISSUED BY SETTLEMENT OFFICER (INAM LANDS), KOTTAYAM.
EXT.P13 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE STATEMENT IN FORM NO.5 (SEE RULE 6) ISSUED BY THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF INAM LANDS, KOTTAYAM.
EXT.P14 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LIST OF WITNESSES ENLISTING THE NAME OF THE TAHSILDAR
EXT.P15 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORIGINALS AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE TAHSILDAR
EXT.P16 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A.NO.4743/2015 IN O.S.NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P17 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A.NO.5227/2015 IN O.S.NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P18 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVAIT TO I.A. NO.4743/2015 IN O.S.NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P19 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.01.2016 PASSED IN I.A. NO.5227/2015 IN O.S.NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P20 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO.4743/2015 IN O.S. NO.845/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!