Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Puthuparampil Vasu Vijayan vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 1272 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1272 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Puthuparampil Vasu Vijayan vs State Of Kerala on 5 June, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
WP(C) NO.40018 OF 2024         1



                                                2025:KER:39532

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                    WP(C) NO. 40018 OF 2024

PETITIONERS:

    1     PUTHUPARAMPIL VASU VIJAYAN,
          AGED 71 YEARS
          S/O.GANGADHARAN, RESIDING AT MEPPURATHU HOUSE,
          KOOTTAR KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE,
          UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
          NOW HAVING ADDRESS AT STANDARD POWDER COATING,
          POST BOX NO. 3197, AJMAN, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES,
          PIN - 685552

    2     PUTHUPARAMPIL SHOBA VIJAYAN,
          AGED 59 YEARS
          W/O.P.V.VIJAYAN, RESIDING AT MEPPURATHU HOUSE,
          KOOTTAR KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE,
          UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
          NOW HAVING ADDRESS AT STANDARD POWDER COATING,
          POST BOX NO. 3197, AJMAN, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES,
          PIN - 685552


          BY ADVS. SHRI. BEJOY JOSEPH P.J.
          SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.)
          SHRI. GOVIND G. NAIR
          SRI.BONNY BENNY
          SRI.BALU TOM


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY LSGD DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
          SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     NEDUMKANGAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
          REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE NEDUMKANDAM
          GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KANKOONTHAL, NEDUMKANDAM P.O.,
          IDUKKI, PIN - 685552
 WP(C) NO.40018 OF 2024            2



                                                         2025:KER:39532


     3       SCARIA @ APPACHAN,
             PAYTTATHEKUZHI, NEDUMKANDAM P.O., NEDUMKANDAM,
             PIN - 685552

     4       MARY,
             D/O.KOCHU, AGED 66 YEARS, THARAYIL HOUSE,
             PIZHAKU P.O., RAMAPURAM VILLAGE PRESENTLY RESIDING
             AT PATTATHEKKUZHY HOUSE, NEDUMKANDAM P.O.,
             KALKOONTHAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,
             PIN - 685553

     5       THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PATTOM P.O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     6       DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
             COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI, KERALA, PIN - 685603


             BY ADVS. SMT.V.H.JASMINE, SC, NEDUMKANDAM GRAMA
             PANCHAYAT
             SMT.NISHA GEORGE
             SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.)
             SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC
             SMT.DEEPA V, GP


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   05.06.2025,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO.40018 OF 2024                3



                                                          2025:KER:39532

                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 05th day of June, 2025

The writ petition is filed to direct the respondents

1 and 2 to implement Exts.P6 and P8 orders

expeditiously.

2. The petitioners are the owners in

possession of two independent properties comprised in

one compact plot in Survey No.186/1 of Kalkoonthal

Village, Udumbanchola Taluk. The property is situated

within the jurisdiction of the 2 nd respondent Panchayat.

The respondents 3 and 4 own and posses a block of land

on the western side of the petitioners' property, and they

are running a workshop and a cardamon drying facility in

an unauthorisedly constructed building. The structure

has been illegally constructed on the common wall of the

parties. On seeing the unauthorised construction, the

petitioners submitted Ext.P1 complaint before the 2nd

respondent. Consequently, the 2nd respondent issued

2025:KER:39532

Ext.P2 show cause notice to the 3rd respondent, asking

him why action shall not be taken in the matter. The

3rd respondent submitted Ext.P3 reply. By Ext.P6 letter,

the 2nd respondent directed the 3rd respondent to

demolish the unauthorised construction. Subsequently,

the 3rd respondent again submitted Ext.P7 reply to Ext.P6

letter, but the 2nd respondent passed Ex.P8 final order,

ordering the demolition of the illegal construction. Even

though Exts.P6 and P8 orders were passed on 09.07.2024

and 27.07.2024 respectively, and the same have attained

finality, the respondents 1 and 2 have not implemented

the orders. The inaction on the part of the respondents 1

and 2 is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the writ petition.

3. The 2nd respondent has filed a counter

affidavit, inter alia, stating that, the respondents 3 and 4

have not complied with Exts.P6 and P8 orders. The 2 nd

respondent would be enforcing the said orders after

31.12.2024, if the respondents 3 and 4 fail to adhere to

their undertaking. In Ext.P7 reply, the 3 rd respondent

2025:KER:39532

has categorically admitted that the tenancy of the

workshop would expire on 31.12.2024 and, thereafter,

the structure would be demolished. Hence, the 2 nd

respondent would enforce Exts.P6 and P8 orders after

31.12.2024.

4. The respondents 3 and 4 have filed a

counter affidavit stating that, the writ petition is not

maintainable since there are disputed questions of fact.

Furthermore, O.S.No.333/2024 filed by them against the

petitioners is pending before the Court of the Munsiff,

Kattappana. Ext.R3(a) interim order of injunction has

been passed in the suit. The respondents 3 and 4 have

not carried out any illegal construction in the property as

alleged in the writ petition. The writ petition is devoid of

any merits and may be dismissed.

5. Heard; the learned Senior Counsel for the

petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for the

respondents 1 and 6, the learned Standing Counsel for

the 2nd respondent, and the learned Counsel for the

2025:KER:39532

respondents 3 and 4.

6. It is not in dispute that Exts.P6 and P8

orders have been passed by the 2 nd respondent, directing

the 3rd respondent to demolish the unauthorised

construction. The said orders have attained finality.

7. Admittedly, the 2nd respondent is not a

party in O.S.No.333/2024 pending before the civil court

and there is no prohibitory order against the 2 nd

respondent from implementing Exts.P6 and P8 orders.

Moreover, in light of the affidavit filed by the 2 nd

respondent, it is evident that the 3rd respondent had

undertaken to demolish the unauthorised construction

after 31.12.2024.

8. In the aforesaid circumstances, especially

since Exts.P6 and P8 orders have been passed on

09.07.2024 and 27.07.2024 respectively, and the time

period sought for by the 3rd respondent has lapsed, I do

not find any justification in the 2 nd respondent not

enforcing its own orders.

2025:KER:39532

Accordingly, I allow the writ petition, by directing

the 2nd respondent to enforce Exts.P6 and P8 orders, in

accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, at

any rate, within 30 days from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS JUDGE NAB

2025:KER:39532

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40018/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ISSUED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO.400548/BAUV01/GPO/2024/3869/(1) DATED 28.05.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 18.06.2024 OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO. AE/LSGD/ LSDREN/ NDKM/2024 DATED 03.07.2024 OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.05.2024 THROUGH RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEARING NO.SC3-3869/24 DATED 09.07.2024 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.07.2024, OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH RTI ACT EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.4005/BAUV01/GPO/2024/3869/(3)DATED 27.07.2024 EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT, DISTRICT COLLECTOR EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.20204 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT-R3(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 30.09.2024 IN O.S. NO. 333 OF 2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE MUNSIFF COURT, KATTAPPANA. EXHIBIT R2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO.

400548/BAUV B01/GPO/20243869/(1) DATED 28.05.2024

2025:KER:39532

EXHIBIT R2(b) TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER BEARING NO. AE/LSGD/LID AND EW/NDKM/2024 DATED 03.07.2024 EXHIBIT R2(c) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THIS RESPONDENT DATED 17.07.2024 EXHIBIT R2(d) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.

400548/BAUV01/GPO/2024/3869/(3) DATED 27.07.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter