Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shajahan. S vs The Director, Institute Of Management ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2858 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2858 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2025

Kerala High Court

Shajahan. S vs The Director, Institute Of Management ... on 24 January, 2025

Author: D. K. Singh
Bench: D. K. Singh
                                    1




W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024
                                                       2025:KER:5838

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH

     FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 4TH MAGHA, 1946

                      WP(C) NO. 18407 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

             SHAJAHAN S.,
             AGED 39 YEARS
             S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, SHAJI MANZIL,
             KOCHU MANNUMALA, IRUMBA, ARUVIKKARA P. O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695564.

             BY ADV.
                 V. A. VINOD

RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE DIRECTOR,
             INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT - IMG,
             VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695033.

     2       THE SECRETARY,
             INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT - IMG,
             VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695033.

             BY ADV.
                 LATHA ANAND - SC

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   24.01.2025,   THE   COURT    ON    THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                    2




W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024
                                                      2025:KER:5838

                          D. K. SINGH, J.
                         --------------------------
                     W.P.(C) No. 18407 of 2024
                           -------------------------
               Dated this the 24th day of January, 2025

                             JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner who was employed as Peon Gr. II in the

respondent Institute on contract basis for 179 days from 01.11.2023

as per Exhibit P-3 order dated 04.11.2023. He has approached this

Court in this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus commanding

the respondents to permit him to continue as Peon Gr. II in the services

of Institute of Management in Government (IMG) till regular

employees appointed after the selection procedures.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is a physically challenged person having physical disability

to an extent of 40%. He was sponsored by the Employment Exchange

for appointment as Peon Gr. II on contract basis. The petitioner

attended the interview and after the interview, he was selected to the

post of Peon Gr. II on contract basis for a period of 179 days. After the

initial contract period got over, the petitioner was allowed to continue

in the service of the respondent Institution as a daily wage worker. The

learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that despite there

W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024 2025:KER:5838

being vacancies for the post of Peon Gr. II, the respondent Institution

is not filling up those vacancies and no person with disability has been

appointed against those posts which is in violation of the Right of

Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. It is further submitted that the

respondents are taking steps to replace the petitioner with another

set of employees on daily wages and, therefore, the petitioner has

approached this Court in this writ petition.

3. The learned Counsel representing the respondents however

submits that the Government has taken a decision that all

appointments in the respondent Institutions run on Grant-in-aid

functioning under the Administrative control of the Personal and

Administrative Reforms Department of the Government of Kerala are

to be filled up by the PSC. The petitioner was given an appointment

on contract basis for a period of 179 days. The contractual

employment come to an end on 27.04.2024. The relieving order in

Exhibit P-4 is dated 25.04.2024 whereby the petitioner along with

similarly placed employees were relieved from duty on 27.04.2024.

4. In the meanwhile, the respondent Institution requested the

Employment Exchange for next list of candidates for being engaged as

Peons and the list was forwarded on 25.04.2024 and 27.04.2024. The

W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024 2025:KER:5838

interviews were held on 25.05.2024, 27.05.2024, 28.05.2024 and

29.05.2024. As there was some delay in appointing the persons who

got selected, the petitioner and seven other persons were allowed to

continue on daily wage basis till provisional appointment of new

candidates through Employment Exchange came.

5. The petitioner's claim for regularization has no basis. The

Institution cannot allow backdoor entry on regular posts. Once the

petitioner's appointment as Peon Gr. II on contract basis came to an

end on 27.04.2024, he does not have any right to continue on the said

post.

6. It is further submitted that the petitioner's appointment as

contractual Peon Gr. II was not on the basis of his disability. As and

when the posts are advised by the PSC, the appropriate provision for

giving reservations to the persons with disabilities shall be made.

7. I have considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the

petitioner and the respondents. The facts as stated are not much in

dispute that the petitioner's appointment was on contractual basis

only for a period of 179 days which came to an end on 27.04.2024. The

petitioner was relieved on 27.04.2024. However, he has been allowed

to work on daily wage basis because of the delay in appointment on

W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024 2025:KER:5838

contract basis by another set of employees who were sponsored by

the Employment Exchange. The petitioner does not have a right for

regularization on the basis of his employment on contract basis for 179

days. As and when the vacancies are advised for regular appointment,

the petitioner may apply, if he is otherwise qualified.

8. In view thereof, I do not find that the petitioner has a right for

the reliefs sought in this writ petition and, therefore, the present writ

petition is hereby dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Sd/-

D. K. SINGH JUDGE Svn

W.P.(C)No. 18407 OF 2024 2025:KER:5838

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18407/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18.9.2023

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.10.2023

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 4.11.2023

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.4.2024

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY ID ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DATED 3.9.2022

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.09.2007 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONAAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA

EXHIBIT R1(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.393/07/IMG DATED 22.06.2007

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter