Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1887 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2025
2025:KER:19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 13TH POUSHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 46812 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2024 IN OS NO.463 OF
2024 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ALATHUR
PETITIONER:
SREELAKSHMI R (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER
KRIPA K MENON,
AGED 39 YEARS
W/O KESAVAN MENON, SAMRAT HOUSE, (KAVASSERY (PO),
KAVASSERY-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
DISTRICT, PIN - 678543
BY ADVS.
ARUN CHANDRAN
HARIMOHAN
AMRITA ARUN
ASWATHY S MENON
HANA KARNOLIA MADONA CYRIL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAGATHI,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695014
2 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION CIVIL
STATION, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN -
691009
2025:KER:19
WP(C) NO.46812 OF 2024
2
3 THE APPELLATE COMMITTEE [CONSTITUTED UNDER THE
KERALA SCHOOL YOUTH FESTIVAL MANUAL,]
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD, CIVIL STATION,
PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,, PIN - 691009
BY ADV.
SURYA BINOY, SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 03.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:19
WP(C) NO.46812 OF 2024
3
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C) No.46812 OF 2024
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2025
JUDGMENT
The petitioner was contestant in the Palakkad Revenue
District Kerala School Kalolsavam 2024-25 in the item
'Group Dance (Girls) HSS General'. The petitioner and
her team could obtain only the second position. The
allegation is with respect to the qualification of the
judges and also that they have shown a partisan attitude
to the winning team. The said allegation is not
substantiated by any material.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is seen considered
in Ext.P2, wherein, it is stated that the petitioner was
heard in person and that the score sheet, the video and
the report of the stage manager were perused and
analyzed by the committee. The committee thereupon 2025:KER:19
WP(C) NO.46812 OF 2024
arrived at a finding that the allegations leveled in the
appeal are not revealed. The alleged infirmity with
respect to the facilities in the stage is common to all
the candidates, wherefore, the petitioner cannot have
any peculiar grievance in this regard. This Court cannot
sit in appeal over the factual findings made by the
Appellate Authority. Nor is this Court expected to do so
in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the
Constitution.
Therefore, this writ petition will stand dismissed.
Sd/-
C.JAYACHANDRAN,JUDGE
SSG 2025:KER:19
WP(C) NO.46812 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 46812/2024
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 27.11.2024
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPEAL BEARING DATE 06.12.2024
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE MUNISFF COURT ALATHUR IN I.A 2173/2024 IN O.S NO.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!