Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V M Mohanan vs The District Collector,Palakkad
2025 Latest Caselaw 12112 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12112 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V M Mohanan vs The District Collector,Palakkad on 11 December, 2025

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025              1

                                                       2025:KER:96237

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

  THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947

                          WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025

PETITIONER/S:

             V M MOHANAN
             AGED 64 YEARS
             S/O.LATE.VASUDEVAN, MULLAPPALLI ILLAM, NAVAKKODE,
             KODUNTHIRAPULLY, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678004

             BY ADV SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT/S:

     1       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PALAKKAD
             COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     2       REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
             COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     3       THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
             OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CIVIL
             STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     4       THE THAHSILDAR (L.R)
             PALAKKAD TALUK OFFICE, PALAKKAD.P.O, PALAKKAD,
             PIN - 678003

     5       THE VILLAGE OFFICER
             PIRAYIRI VILLAGE, PIRAYIRI.P.O, PALAKKAD TALUK,
             PALAKKAD, PIN - 678004

     6       THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
             KRISHIBHAVAN, PIRAYIRI.P.O, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD,
             PIN - 678004

     7       LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
             PIRAYIRI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PIRAYIORI.P.O, ALATHUR TALUK,
             PALAKKAD, REP.BY ITS CONVENER, PIN - 678004
 WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025            2

                                                       2025:KER:96237


     8       THE DIRECTOR
             KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING & ENVIRONMENT CENTRE,
             'C' BLOCK, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANATHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695033

             GP SMT DEEPA V


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025                       3

                                                                        2025:KER:96237

                          P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                    ---------------------------------------------
                           WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025
                ------------------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 11th day of December, 2025

                                     JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction and quash Ext.P6, Order dated 02.09.2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent.

ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction and direct the 2nd respondent to delete the petitioner's property comprised in Re.Sy.No.169/1-1, 169/2-19 in Block No.19 of Pirayiri Village, Palakkad Taluk in Palakkad District having an extent of 0.0433 Hectare from Ext.P3, Data Bank.

iii) It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may dispense the production of English Translation of the documents produced in the above W.P.(c) and Petitioner undertakes to produce the same as and when required by this Hon'ble Court. And

iv) Issue such other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case so as to secure the ends of justice."

[SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the

2nd respondent rejecting the Form-5 application submitted by him under

the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 ('Rules',

for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised

officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the

2025:KER:96237

considered opinion that the authorised officer has failed to comply with

the statutory requirements. The impugned order was passed by the

authorised officer solely based on the report of the Agricultural Officer.

There is no indication in the order that the authorised officer has directly

inspected the property or called for the satellite pictures as mandated

under Rule 4(4f) of the Rules. There is no independent finding regarding

the nature and character of the land as on the relevant date by the

authorised officer. Moreover, the authorised officer has not considered

whether the exclusion of the property would prejudicially affect the

surrounding paddy fields.

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v. Revenue

Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524], Sudheesh U v. The Revenue

Divisional Officer, Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386], and Joy K.K. v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT

433], observed that the competent authority is obliged to assess the

nature, lie and character of the land and its suitability for paddy

cultivation as on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive criteria to determine

whether the property merits exclusion from the data bank. The impugned

order is not in accordance with the principle laid down by this Court in

the above judgments. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the

impugned order is to be set aside.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in the following manner:

2025:KER:96237

1. Ext.P6 order is set aside.

2. The 2nd respondent/authorised officer is directed to reconsider Ext.P5 Form - 5 application in accordance with the law. The authorised officer shall either conduct a personal inspection of the property or, alternatively, call for the satellite pictures, in accordance with Rule 4(4f) of the Rules, at the cost of the petitioner, if not already called for.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the application shall be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of such pictures. On the other hand, if the authorised officer opts to personally inspect the property, the application shall be considered and disposed of within two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner.

4. If the Authorised Officer is either dismissing or allowing the petition, a speaking order, as directed by this Court in the judgment dated 05.11.2025 in Vinumon v.

District Collector [2025 (6) KLT 275], shall be passed.

Sd/-

                                               P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
                                                        JUDGE
  AJ


    Judgment reserved     NA
     Date of judgment    11.12.2025
  Draft Judgment placed 12.12.2025
 Final Judgment uploaded 15.12.2025


                                                         2025:KER:96237

                   APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 46270 OF 2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1                TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED
                          20.08.2022
Exhibit P2                TRUE COPY OF LOCATION SKETCH OF PETITIONER'S
                          PROPERTY
Exhibit P3                TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA

BANK PUBLISHED BY PIRAYIRI GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 24/03/2012 Exhibit P4 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM-5 APPLICATION DATED 25.08.2022 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN FILE NO.5363/2024 DATED 02.09.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter