Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Faisal.S Kabeer vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 5762 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5762 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Faisal.S Kabeer vs State Of Kerala on 19 August, 2025

                                               2025:KER:62590
Crl.M.C No.6862/2024
                                 1

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH

 TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 28TH SRAVANA, 1947

                    CRL.MC NO. 6862 OF 2024

    CRIME NO.928/2022 OF Pathanamthitta Police Station,

                           Pathanamthitta

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.65 OF 2023

OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PATHANAMTHITTA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6:
    1     FAISAL.S KABEER
          AGED 29 YEARS
          S/O KABEER, LABHA VILAYIL HOUSE, ANJAKKALA,
          PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    2      SAJEEDA BEEVI
           AGED 55 YEARS
           W/O KABEER, LABHA VILAYIL HOUSE, ANJAKKALA,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    3      RAMSI
           AGED 33 YEARS
           D/O KABEER, LABHA VILAYIL HOUSE, ANJAKKALA,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    4      NOUFAL
           AGED 31 YEARS
           S/O KABEER, LABHA VILAYIL HOUSE, ANJAKKALA,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    5      KABEER
           AGED 57 YEARS
           S/O HASASANKUTTY LABHA VILAYIL HOUSE, ANJAKKALA,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    6      NIZAM .S
           AGED 45 YEARS
                                                      2025:KER:62590
Crl.M.C No.6862/2024
                                 2

          S/O HAMEED,KEEZHUMALA
          PURAYIDAM,KUMBAZHA.P.O.,PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN -
          689653


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR
          SMT.V.B.SANTHINI
          SMT.RADHIKA RAMACHANDRAN




RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS:

     1    STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, PIN - 682031

     2    STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA
          DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

     3    SHAHANA.S
          AGED 24 YEARS
          D/O LATE SHAJI.M, RESIDING AT CHUTTIPPARA VADAKKE
          CHARUVIL, ANAPPARA P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
          PIN - 689645


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.SAGITH KUMAR V.
          SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR
          SMT.DEVAPRIYA S.
          SHRI.SHEFEEK A.
          SHRI.PRASHOBH K.V.
          SMT.PUSHPALATHA M.K. SR.P.P



      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   19.08.2025,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                    2025:KER:62590
Crl.M.C No.6862/2024
                                3



                             ORDER

The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 6 in C.C

No.65/2023 on the files of Chief Judicial Magistrate Court,

Pathanamthitta. The offences alleged against them are under

Sections 324, 323 and 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

2. The prosecution case is summarised as follows: The

2nd accused is the mother of the 1 st accused. The accused Nos.3

and 4 are the siblings of the 1 st accused. The 5th accused is the

father of 1st accused and the 6th accused is a close relative of

the 1st accused. The 1st accused/1st petitioner married the

defacto complainant on 28.03.2021 and started life along with

her in his residence. From the first week of the marriage

onwards, the 1st petitioner started physically and mentally

torturing the defacto complainant, demanding more dowry, and

also by saying that she was not good looking. The other

petitioners joined the 1st petitioner in harassing her. On one

occasion, the 1st petitioner tried to push her down into a pit near 2025:KER:62590

the house at a time when she was pregnant. On another

occasion, he had inflicted blows upon her with an iron rod and

caused injuries. In addition to the above physical assaults, the

1st petitioner persistently subjected her to mental torture

depicting her as a psychic patient. Thus, the petitioners

committed the aforesaid offences.

3. In the present petition, the petitioners would contend

that they are totally innocent, and that they have been falsely

implicated in this case. It is further stated that the allegations

levelled against the petitioners are of general and vague nature,

which are not sufficient to constitute the offences alleged in this

case.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the

learned counsel for the defacto complainant and the learned

Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

5. On going through the First Information Statement

given by the defacto complainant, as well as the statements of

other witnesses, it is seen that there are specific allegations 2025:KER:62590

levelled against the 1st petitioner/1st accused with regard to the

matrimonial cruelty meted out to the defacto complainant. The

defacto complainant is said to have been subjected to physical

as well as mental torture by the 1 st petitioner/1st accused.

However, as against the other petitioners, there is only an

omnibus allegation that they also harassed her. It is not made

clear by the defacto complainant in her statement, as to the way

in which the other petitioners resorted to cruelty towards her.

Thus, it has to be stated that the vague and superficial

allegations against the petitioners 2 to 6 are not sufficient to

fasten them with the criminal liability alleged in this case.

Therefore, the prayer of the petitioners 2 to 6 to quash the

proceedings against them, is well founded. However, there is

absolutely no reason to wind-up the prosecution proceedings

against the 1st petitioner/1st accused, since the prosecution

records would clearly point to the offences under Sections 323,

324 and 498A of IPC, attributed against him.

2025:KER:62590

In the result, the petition stands allowed in part, as follows:

(i) The proceedings against the petitioners 2 to 6

(accused Nos.2 to 6) in C.C No.65/2023 on the files of the Chief

Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta, which arose out of

Crime No.928/2022 of Pathanamthitta Police Station, are hereby

quashed.

(ii) It is made clear that there is absolutely no legal

impediment for the Trial Court to proceed against the 1 st

petitioner/1st accused in connection with the offences alleged

against him.

Sd/-G.GIRISH JUDGE ma/19.08.2025 /True copy/ 2025:KER:62590

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.928 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 9.5.2023.

Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE O.P 589/2022 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 19.5.2022 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN M.C.16 OF 2022 BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT,PATHANAMTHITTA Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER FROM THE BELIEVERS CHURCH MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL DATED 24.3.2022.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter