Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paulose Xavier vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 2295 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2295 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Paulose Xavier vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2025

                                                       2025:KER:58857

Crl.M.C.No.4375/2025
​    ​    ​    ​    ​      ​         1



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH

    WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1947

                        CRL.MC NO. 4375 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.2126/2023 OF Ernakulam South Police Station, Ernakulam

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1985 OF 2023 OF

ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (E&O),ERNAKULAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            PAULOSE XAVIER​
            AGED 75 YEARS​
            S/O PAULOSE, NILA HOUSE, MANIKATH ROAD, KOCHI, PIN -
            682016


            BY ADVS. ​
            SHRI.SASI M.R.​
            SMT.N.P.SILPA​
            SMT.KAVYA KRISHNAN​
            SMT.DHARMYA M.S​
            SHRI.S.SAJIT SANAL​



RESPONDENT/STATE/INVESTIGATING OFFICER & DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA​
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            PIN - 682031

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER​
            ERNAKULAM TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
            DISTRICT, PIN - 682015
                                                     2025:KER:58857

Crl.M.C.No.4375/2025
​    ​    ​    ​    ​   ​       2



    3     MANASA T K​
          AGED 20 YEARS​
          D/O RAMAKRISHNAN, THATTANIKUZHIYIL HOUSE,
          EDATHILUMUKKU, MEPPIYOOR VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE, PIN -
          673305


OTHER PRESENT:

          SRI SUDHEER G., PP

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.08.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                            2025:KER:58857

Crl.M.C.No.4375/2025
​    ​    ​    ​    ​       ​       3




                                 ORDER

​ The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1985 of 2023 on

the files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court

(Economic Offences), Ernakulam, which arose out of Crime

No.2126/2023 of Ernakulam Town South Police Station,

Ernakulam. The offence alleged against him is under Section

354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

​ 2.​ The prosecution case is that on 15.09.2023 and

16.09.2023, the petitioner outraged the modesty of the de facto

complainant and her friend (CW3), who were residing in the

upper floor of the house of the petitioner as tenants. It is alleged

that the petitioner had pushed aside CW3 by her breast at

about 6.00 a.m on 15.09.2023, when they came to the

residence of the petitioner to sort out the issue regarding

accommodating one of their friends as a tenant in the building

belonging to the petitioner, where they had been residing.

Thereafter, on 16.09.2023, the petitioner allegedly pushed aside 2025:KER:58857

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 4

the de facto complainant, by her lower abdomen, when they

came to his residence for having discussions on the issue

relating to the tenancy. The case has been registered on the

basis of the First Information Statement given by the de facto

complainant to the Sub Inspector of Police of Ernakulam Town

South Police Station on 17.09.2023.

3.​ After the completion of investigation, the Sub

Inspector of Police of Ernakulam Town South Police Station,

filed the Final Report alleging the commission of offence under

Section 354 of the IPC by the petitioner.

4.​ In the present petition, the petitioner would contend

that he is totally innocent, and that he has been falsely

implicated in this case.

5.​ According to the petitioner, a false case has been

foisted against him, since he objected to the unwarranted

activities of the de facto complainant and her friends in the

tenanted premises.

                                                           2025:KER:58857


​    ​    ​    ​    ​     ​        5




6.​ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the

learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

7.​ As already stated above, two incidents are projected

in the First Information Statement given by the de facto

complainant with regard to the alleged act of the petitioner,

outraging the modesty of the de facto complainant and another

girl. In the first incident, the petitioner allegedly pushed CW3 by

her breast, when they came for a discussion with him and his

wife, with regard to the accommodation to be provided to

another girl in the rented building. In the second incident, the

petitioner allegedly pushed aside the de facto complainant by

touching her stomach, when she, along with her friends, came

to the residence of the petitioner on 16.09.2023, for talks

towards sorting out the issues relating to the tenancy.

8.​ With regard to both these incidents, the allegation is

that the petitioner committed those acts under the heat of anger.

So also, both these incidents are said to have happened in the 2025:KER:58857

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 6

presence of the wife of the petitioner. It is not possible to

discern from the First Information Statement, or the other

statements given by the friends of the de facto complainant that

the petitioner committed the aforesaid acts with the intention to

outrage the modesty of those girls. So also, it is not possible to

say that he was having the knowledge that the aforesaid act of

pushing aside those girls would amount to outraging their

modesty. It seems that this crime is the offshoot of the tenancy

issues relating to the accommodation provided to the de facto

complainant and her friends in the first floor of the house of the

petitioner.

9.​ It is not possible to say, on the basis of the available

prosecution records, that the petitioner committed the alleged

acts with the intention to outrage the modesty of the de facto

complainant and her friend or with the knowledge that the

alleged acts would amount to outraging their modesty.

10.​ In that view of the matter, the continuation of the 2025:KER:58857

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 7

prosecution against the petitioner, in connection with the

commission of offence under Section 354 IPC, can only be

termed as an abuse of process of the court. That being so, the

prayer in this petition to quash the proceedings against the

petitioner, is fully justified.

In the result, the petition stands allowed. The proceedings

against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.1985 of 2023 on the

files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court (Economic

Offences), Ernakulam, which arose out of Crime No.2126/2023

of Ernakulam Town South Police Station, Ernakulam, are

hereby quashed.

sd/

G.GIRISH JUDGE jm/ ​ 2025:KER:58857

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 8

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A2 ACCUSED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 16.09.2023 IN C.C. NO. 1985/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT (EO), ERNAKULAM Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RENT AGREEMENT DATED 06/06/2023 Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY FROM MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL DATED 01/07/2010 Annexure A5 A TRUE COPY OF PRESCRIPTION CHIT DATED 02/02/2023 FROM LAKSHMI HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter