Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T P Muhamad Basheer vs Kalpathur Service Co-Operative Bank ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 27858 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27858 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

T P Muhamad Basheer vs Kalpathur Service Co-Operative Bank ... on 13 September, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                                           2024:KER:70200



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                         PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

 FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 22ND BHADRA, 1946

                 WP(C) NO. 28540 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

         T P MUHAMAD BASHEER
         AGED 58 YEARS
         S/O SOOPY, THAYYULLAPARAMBIL,
         KOZHUKKALOR VILLAGE,QUILANDY TALUK,
         KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673524


         BY ADVS.
         DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.
         SMINI JOSE
         AMRUTHA




RESPONDENTS:

    1    KALPATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
         KALPATHUR P O, KOZHIKODE
         REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, PIN - 673524

    2    DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION
         GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
         REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY TO GOVT.,
         PIN - 695001
                                            2024:KER:70200
WP(C) No.28540 of 2024
                           2


    3    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)
         OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
         COOPERATIVE SOCIETY(GENERAL)
         SAHAKARANA BHAVAN,KOYILANDY,
         KOZHIKODE,KERALA, PIN - 673305


         BY ADVS.
         M.PROMODH KUMAR
         MAYA CHANDRAN(K/2573/1999)
         SMT.MABLE C. KURIAN, SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP        FOR
ADMISSION ON 13.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME        DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                  2024:KER:70200
WP(C) No.28540 of 2024
                             3



                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 13th day of September, 2024

The petitioner is a practicing Lawyer. On 17.12.2009,

the petitioner availed a loan for an amount of ₹25,000/- from

the 1st respondent-Bank. The entire loan was repaid by the

petitioner. But the then Secretary to the 1st respondent-Bank

had manipulated the records and embezzled the money from

the Bank and now there are no records which would go to

show that the petitioner has repaid the money.

2. Now, the Bank has filed Ext.P3 Execution

Petition for recovery of the amount with interest due as per

Ext.P2 Award. Ext.P2 Award was passed without providing an

opportunity to the petitioner to be heard and that is an ex-

parte Award also. The petitioner has filed Exts.P4 and P5

applications to set aside the ex-parte order way back in 2023.

2024:KER:70200

The 3rd respondent is not considering the same and the

Munsiff's Court is proceeding with Ext.P3 Execution Petition.

Hence, the petitioner approached this Court for early disposal

of Exts.P4 and P5 petitions to set aside Ext.P2 ex-parte

Award and for consequential reliefs.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel representing the

1st respondent and the learned Government Pleader

representing the 3rd respondent.

4. The limited prayer of the petitioner is to direct

the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P4 and P5 applications.

Ext.P4 is an application seeking to set aside ex-parte order.

Ext.P5 is a delay condonation petition. Exts.P4 and P5 being

applications of statutory nature, it would be only just and

proper that the 3rd respondent considers the same in

accordance with law. The Standing Counsel for the 2024:KER:70200

1st respondent would submit that the applications themselves

are not maintainable. If that be so, it is for the 3 rd respondent

to consider the same while processing Exts.P4 and P5

applications.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 3rd respondent / competent Arbitrator to consider

Exts.P4 and P5 applications and take appropriate decision

thereon adverting to the maintainability issue also. Execution

Proceedings against the petitioner shall stand deferred till the

3rd respondent takes a decision in the matter.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk 2024:KER:70200

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28540/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ARC 573/2020 PETITION FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPARTE AWARD DATED 03.09.2021 PASSED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION 175/2022 DATED 15.08.2022 FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 08.06.2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO SETASIDE EXPARTE AWARD.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION DATED 08.06.2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO CONDONE THE DELAY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter