Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26555 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024
2024:KER:67852
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 14TH BHADRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 24926 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
VIBGYOR NITHYA NIDHI LIMITED
23/22H, KUNNUMMAL TOWER, CH BYPASS, JUNCTION,
PANDIKKAD ROAD, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM, KERALA,PIN-
676122 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALI MANSOOR
K AGED 49, S/O ABDULLA HASAN K, DARUL AMAN,
KIZHAKKETHALA, MANJERI COLLEGE PO, MALAPPURAM, PIN
- 676122
BY ADVS.
S.RENJITH
EDISON THOMAS T.
P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN
S.UNNIKRISHNAN (NELLAD)
K.R.PRATHISH
KRISHNA DAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF
CORPORATE AFFAIRS, "A"WING, SHASTRI BHAVAN,
RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
W.P.(C).No.24926/2024 2024:KER:67852
2
2 JOINT SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, "A"WING, SHASTRI
BHAVAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN -
110001
3 THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR
SOUTHERN REGION, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS,
SHASTRI BHAVAN, BLOCK 1, VTH FLOOR, 26, HADDOWS
ROAD, CHENNAI, PIN - 600006
4 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ERNAKULAM
COMPANY LAW BUILDING, KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN -
682021
BY ADV P.R.AJITH KUMAR
SRI. P.R. AJITH KUMAR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUSEL,
DSGI IN CHARGE T..C KRISHNA, SRI. AJITH
VISWANATHAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 05.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.24926/2024 2024:KER:67852
3
V.G.ARUN, J
=================
W.P.(C).No.24926 of 2024
=====================
Dated this the 5th day of September ,2024
JUDGMENT
When this case was taken up, the counsel for the
petitioner submitted that the issue is covered by the judgment
in W.P.(C).No.38860/2023 & connected cases and the same
directions may be issued in this case also. The directions in the
said judgment reads as under:-
(a) The challenge to the amendments to Section 406 of the Companies Act, 2013, as also to the "Nidhi Rules, 2014" -
as impelled in these writ petitions - are left undecided and kept open for future consideration, if it becomes so warranted.
(b) Each of the petitioners in these cases will be at liberty to approach the competent Authority, for compounding the offences alleged against them; and if such are made within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, they shall be considered by the said Authority with the maximum empathy requisite; thus leading to the imposition of the least sum of penalty, as permissible in law - however, subject to the evaluation W.P.(C).No.24926/2024 2024:KER:67852
and determination of such, on a case-to-case basis by the competent Authority. But, these protections will not apply in a case where criminality is suspected, or found, or in which action under the criminal law is initiated or proposed; in which event, the respective petitioners will be informed to the same appositely.
(c) On the offences committed by the petitioner - Nidhi Companies, if any, being compounded in terms of the afore directions, they will be at liberty to apply afresh, in the format prescribed as per the "NDH Form"; and if this is done, it will be considered dispassionately and without being trammeled or influenced by the earlier rejections, and dehors the orders qua the same; and appropriate new orders and necessary action issued and completed thereon, without any avoidable delay, but not later than three months from the date of the receipt of the application.
(d) If, on the contrary, the competent Authority is to find any objection with the applications of the petitioner - "Nidhi Companies" under the "NDH" Format, they shall not reject it peremptorily, but will notify each of them appropriately through apposite proceedings, intimating them of such and giving them a minimum of one month to rectify the same, to be then resubmitted as per law. Should there be any further defects still found to be subsisting, the Authority will then hear the respective applicants and give W.P.(C).No.24926/2024 2024:KER:67852
them such necessary further time as may be fixed, to rectify them, before taking a final decision.
(e) The competent Authorities will permit the petitioners to raise their capital within the threshold limit as per the Statutory requirement; for which purpose, all applications and requirements for such will be acceded to, subject to other mandatory requirements being satisfied. Needless to say, if the petitioners require any clarifications in future, on the working of the afore directions, they will be at liberty to approach this Court through appropriate applications."
Being in respectful agreement with the directions
extracted above, the writ petition is disposed of by making the
directions in W.P.(C).No.38860/2023 & connected cases
applicable to this case also.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN, JUDGE BG/SSK W.P.(C).No.24926/2024 2024:KER:67852
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24926/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY DATED 02.02.2022
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NIDHI RULES 2014 DATED 31.03.2014
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NIDHI AMENDMENT RULES 2019 DATED 01.07.2019
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NIDHI AMENDMENT RULES 2020 DATED 14.02.2020
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.03.2024 IN WPC NO. 35587 OF 2023
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NDH-4 APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 03.04.2023
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.06.2024 OF 2ND RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS NIL EXHIBITS
TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!