Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. P.G. Latha vs Kerala State Council For Science
2024 Latest Caselaw 26523 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26523 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Dr. P.G. Latha vs Kerala State Council For Science on 5 September, 2024

Author: Murali Purushothaman

Bench: Murali Purushothaman

WP(C) No.29131/2024                         1/8

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                         PRESENT
                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
            Thursday, the 5th day of September 2024 / 14th Bhadra, 1946
                              WP(C) NO. 29131 OF 2024
   PETITIONER:

          DR. P.G. LATHA, AGED 67 YEARS, (RETIRED DIRECTOR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
          TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, PALODE P.O,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 562) RESIDING AT 'MALATHY', FLAT 8 B, SFS
          GRANDE, SREE RANGAM LANE, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN -
          695010

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. KERALA STATE COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, SASTHRA BHAVAN, PATTOM.P.O,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695004
      2. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE,
         PALODE P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR , PIN -
         695562
      3. KERALA FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, PEECHI, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY
         ITS DIRECTOR. , PIN - 680653
      4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
         DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN - 695001

         Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to direct the respondents to issue Non Liability Certificate, without further
   delay pending disposal of this writ petition.
         This petition again coming on for admission upon perusing the
   petition and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the
   arguments of M/S.THAMPAN THOMAS, B.V.JOY SANKAR, NINCY MATHEW & HENA
   BAHULEYAN, Advocates for the petitioner,P. C. SASIDHARAN, STANDING COUNSEL
   for R1, and C.K.KARUNAKARAN, STANDING COUNSEL for R2, C.K.PRASAD for R3
   and of GOVERNMENT PLEADER for R4, the court passed the following:
 WP(C) No.29131/2024                       2/8




                         MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
                       ========================
                              W.P.(C) No.29131 of 2024
                            ==================
                      Dated this the 05th day of September, 2024

                                       ORDER

The petitioner retired from the service of the 2 nd

respondent- Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic

Garden and Research Institute (JNTBGRI) as

Director on 31.08.2016. The grievance of the

petitioner is that,even after 8 years after retirement,

the gratuity due to her is not disbursed.

2. The petitioner and similarly situated persons

had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C)

No.24687 of 2017 and connected cases and this

Court, by Ext.P1 judgment dated 01.11.2018,

declared that the petitioners therein are entitled to

be paid full amount of gratuity due to them in

accordance with Rule 14 of Section II of Part I of the

KSCSTE Rules and Regulations, ie, with reference to

the number of years' service rendered by them

without any ceiling, within two months from the date

of receipt of a copy of the judgment, failing which

the amount shall carry interest @ 10% interest per

annum from the next day of the retirement of the

petitioners.

3. It is contended that despite the directions in

Ext.P1 judgment, the petitioner is not so far paid the

gratuity. According to her, she is entitled for an

amount of Rs.29,69,867/- towards gratuity.

4. In Ext.P3 communication issued by the 2 nd

respondent after nearly 5 years of her retirement, it

is stated that an amount of Rs.59,667/- is her liability

to JNTBGRI and only on remitting the said amount

the files can be processed and Non Liability

Certificate can be issued. In reply to Ext. P3 the

petitioner submitted Ext. P4 letter requesting the 2 nd

respondent to release her gratuity after deducting

the amount of Rs.59,667/- .

5. Ext.P5 communication is issued by the 3 rd

respondent, the Kerala Forest Research Institute,

where she was holding the charge of Director for a

short period, stating that the petitioner's name is

mentioned in Ext.P7 report of the Finance Inspection

report of the Government and the report does not

quantify the extent of the liability of the petitioner

and therefore, they are not in a position to report

the actual liability of the petitioner.

6. It is to be noted that, though Ext.P7 report of

the Finance Inspection (NT-H) Department is dated

14.10.2018, so far no steps have been taken to

quantify the extent of liability of the petitioner, if

any.

7. Rule 14.4 of Section II of Part I of the

KSCSTE Rules and Regulations provides that any

amount owed by a retired employee to the Council

shall be recovered from the gratuity of the

employee. The petitioner retired from service on

31.08.2016 and Ext.P7 report is dated 14.10.2018

and till this time, the petitioner is not informed

whether she has caused any pecuniary loss to the

respondents or what is the amount due from her to

the Council. Is it possible in law for the respondents

to proceed against her on the basis of Ext.P7 at this

distance of time?

8. It is trite that pension is not a bounty and is a

vested right of the person entitled to it. The gratuity

due to the petitioner has been withheld for the last

eight years. The respondents have not placed on

record any counter affidavit. Accordingly, as an

interim relief, there will be a direction to the

competent among the respondents to release an

amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only)

from the gratuity due to the petitioner, within a

period of two months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order. The payment as above will be

subject to further orders to be passed by this Court

and without prejudice to the right if any of the

respondents to proceed against the petitioner in a

civil court for recovering the pecuniary loss if any

caused by her to the respondents, in accordance

with law.

9. The respondents shall place on record

counter affidavits.

Post on 07.112024.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE

SB

05-09-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 24687 OF 2017 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 01.11.2018 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 03/ESTT1/2021/JNTBGRI DATED 07.05.2021 Exhibit P4 A COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.05.2021 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO:

G113/KSCSTE/KFRI/ESTT/2003/FIN DATED 26.07.2021 Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF INSPECTION REPORT NO. 552/FIW-H1/2016/FIN DATED 14.10.2018

05-09-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter