Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdulla vs Shamla
2024 Latest Caselaw 30193 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30193 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Abdulla vs Shamla on 24 October, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

Mat.Appeal No.524 of 2023    1


                                                2024:KER:79280
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                    &

          THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 2ND KARTHIKA, 1946

                      MAT.APPEAL NO.524 OF 2023

    AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2023 IN
  O.P(OTHERS) NO.714 OF 2019 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:

            ABDULLA, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O HAMSATHKOYA,
            KOOTTUMMAL KIZHAKKATHIL HOUSE, VEEYAPURAM MURI,
            VEEYAPURAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK,
            ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690514

            BY ADV R.UMASANKAR
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

            SHAMLA, AGED 39 YEARS, D/O ABDUL LATHEEF,
            PAKKALLIL HOUSE, VEEYAPURAM MURI, VEEYAPURAM
            VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
            PIN - 690514

            BY ADVS.
            ABDUL LATHIEF T.M
            VAISHNAV DEV(K/1081/2023)

     THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
24.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Mat.Appeal No.524 of 2023      2


                                                       2024:KER:79280
                              JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

Through this Appeal, the appellant calls into question the

validity of the order of the learned Family Court, Mavelikkara, in

O.P (Others) No.714 of 2019.

2. However, on 17.10.2024, when this matter was called,

Sri.Abdul Latheef - learned Counsel for the respondent,

submitted that if the appellant is willing to pay to his client an

amount of ₹15 Lakhs, without much delay, then she will agree

to all disputes between the parties being settled; and also either

for cancellation of sale of the property - which she had obtained

levying execution of the decree; or for its reconveyance, as the

case may be.

3. Today, Sri.R.Umasankar - learned Counsel appearing for

the appellant, acceded to the afore suggestion and said that his

client will pay ₹15 Lakhs to the respondent within a period of

two months. He prayed that his client will be allowed to either

2024:KER:79280 move the learned Family Court for setting aside the sale, if it

has been done - which the respondent must be ordered to

accede to; or, in the alternative, if the sale has been confirmed,

then for reconveyance of the property, for which his client will

defray all expenses.

4. Since Sri.Abdul Latheef acceded to the afore

suggestions on behalf of his client, we do not deem it necessary

to hear this Appeal on its merits, and we dispose it of as under:

(a) The impugned judgment of the learned Family Court,

Mavelikkara will stand set aside.

(b) The afore is, however, on condition that the appellant

will pay an amount of ₹15 Lakhs by way of Demand Draft, to be

drawn on a Nationalised/Scheduled Bank, to the learned

Counsel appearing for the respondent in the learned Trial Court,

on or before 02.01.2025.

(c) On the above being done, if the sale of the property

has not been confirmed, then we allow the appellant to move an

2024:KER:79280 appropriate application to have it set aside, which shall be

acceded to by the respondent without demur. We record, that

this is been expressly acceded to by Sri.Abdul Latheef on behalf

of his client.

(d) On the contrary, if the sale has been confirmed in the

Execution Petition in favour of the respondent, they will

reconvey the same in favour of the appellant, for which, he will

make available the deed for her signature, as also defray all

expenses. This shall be done by the respondent within a period

of one month from the date on which the deed is given to them,

by the appellant for such purpose.

(e) Needless to say, if the appellant is to default in

payment as afore, the benefit of this judgment will be lost to

him and the impugned judgment of the learned Family Court will

stand restored; and the sale of the property will be confirmed in

favour of the respondent.

(f) It also goes without saying that if the respondent does

2024:KER:79280 not do what she has been ordered to be done by this Court, the

appellant is granted liberty to approach us with an appropriate

application for necessary orders.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE

sp/24/10/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter