Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Praveen vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 29611 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29611 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Praveen vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                       2024:KER:77971

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

    THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 25TH ASWINA, 1946

                     CRL.MC NO. 5494 OF 2024

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN MC NO.181 OF 2024 OF

                    SUB.DVL.MAGISTRATE,KOLLAM

PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

          PRAVEEN
          AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. KARUNAKARAN,
          PUTHUVAL VEEDU, THAYYIL, ULIYAKOVILCHERRY,
          KOLLAM, PIN - 691004

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.BHANU THILAK
          SRI.S.R.PRASANTH
          SRI.VISHNU.R


RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2     SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
          KOLLAM, CIVIL STATION KOLLAM, PIN - 691013

    3     STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM, PIN - 691001

          BY ADV.
          SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C No.5494 of 2024                 2

                                                                   2024:KER:77971

                           BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                       -------------------------------------------
                            Crl.M.C.No.5494 of 2024
                  ----------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 17th day of October, 2024



                                      ORDER

Petitioner is the counter-petitioner in M.C. No.181/2024 on the

files of the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Kollam. The said proceedings

have been initiated under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C'). A preliminary order dated 18.03.2024 has been

issued, which is produced as Annexure A1 under section 111 of Cr.P.C,

directing the petitioner to show cause why he should not be ordered to

execute a bond under Section 107 Cr.P.C to keep peace for a period of

one year. Petitioner challenges the aforesaid show cause notice pointing

out that there is an inherent infirmity in the impugned order of the Sub

Divisional Magistrate.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

as the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. In Girish P. and Others v. State of Kerala and

Another (2009 (4) KHC 929) it has been observed that Section 111

Cr.P.C mandates that a Magistrate acting under Section 107 Cr.P.C

must of necessity set forth the substance of the information in the

2024:KER:77971

order under Section 111 to enable the party against whom such an

order is proposed to be issued to appear and show cause against the

allegations. It was further held that unless such information is furnished

to the person against whom the order is proposed to be issued, he

cannot defend the allegation.

4. In the Full Bench decision in Moidu v. State of Kerala

(1982 KLT 578), it was observed that the involvement in a criminal case

by itself, is not a guide to initiate proceedings under Section 107 and

an imminent breach of peace warranting initiation of such a proceeding

is what is required.

5. Similarly in Bejoy K.V. v. State of Kerala and Another

(2015 (5) KHC 507) this Court has observed that the order under

Section 111 Cr.P.C must reflect that the Magistrate has assessed the

truth of the information received by him and there is an imminent need

for taking action to preserve peace.

6. A perusal of Annexure-A1 order reveals that the substance

of the information received by the Magistrate has not been clearly

delineated in the order. Though there is reference to one criminal case

a vague reference to the petitioner being involved in acts of violence

causing a breach of public peace, there is nothing specific in the

information that is recorded in the impugned order. It is evident that

2024:KER:77971

Annexure-A1 order does not satisfy the requirements laid down in the

various judgments of this Court including those in Moidu v. State of

Kerala (supra) and other judgments referred earlier.

7. In view of the above, the preliminary order issued in M.C.

No.181/2024 on the files of the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Kollam,

against the petitioner is bereft of any legal backing and is liable to be

quashed. Ordered accordingly.

Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJ

2024:KER:77971

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 18-03-2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 111(1) OF CR.P.C. IN MC

Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 09-03-2024 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 107 CRPC

Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF FIR DATED 21-05-2019 IN CRIME NO. 1001/2019 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter