Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29506 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024
2024:KER:77619
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 25TH ASWINA, 1946
RP NO. 402 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.04.2019 IN MFA (FOREST) NO.73
OF 2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
-----
REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHEIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF
KERALA, THIRUVANATHAPURAM G.P.O, PIN - 695001.
2 CUSTODIAN OF ECOLOGICALLY FRAGILE LANDS VESTED IN
GOVERNMENT
(THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST)FOREST HEAD
QUARTERS,THIRUVANATHAPURAM,THYCAUD.PO,, PIN - 695014.
BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER (FOREST) SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
E.RENEESH
S/O.E.MOIDEEN KOYA, EDATHIL HOUSE, FLORICAN
HILLROAD,KARAPARAMBA.PO,KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673010.
BY ADVS.
B.KRISHNAN
R.PARTHASARATHY
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:77619
SATHISH NINAN &
JOHNSON JOHN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
R.P. No.402 of 2024 in
M.F.A. (Forest) No.73 of 2017
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 17th day of October, 2024
O R D E R
Sathish Ninan, J.
The common judgment in MFA (Forest) Nos.68/2017,
69/2017 and 73 of 2017 is sought to be reviewed.
2. The grounds urged for review are challenging the
correctness of the findings entered into by this Court
in its judgment. It is too well settled by the judgments
of the Apex Court that, a review is not to be an appeal
in disguise. No error apparent on the face of the record
could be pointed out by the review petitioner. The
review petition is liable to be dismissed.
3. It is also to be noticed that, as per judgment
dated 12.04.2019, this Court had jointly disposed of the
three M.F.As afore mentioned. The appeals related to
properties which are lying adjacent. The basic title
2024:KER:77619
relating to the property is the same viz. Partition Deed
No.1517/1970. However, there is no challenge against the
judgment in MFA (Forest) Nos.68 of 2017 and 69 of 2017.
We do not find any reason to entertain the review.
The Review Petition fails and is dismissed.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
Sd/-
JOHNSON JOHN JUDGE kns/-
//True Copy//
P.S. To Judge 2024:KER:77619
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE-R1(b) True copy of the order of this Honourable Court, dated 08-02-2023 in WPC.13562/2022.
ANNEXURE-R1(c) The true copy of affidavit filed in Contempt Case (C) No. 303/2024 by the Chief Conservator of Forests dated 25.03.2024
ANNEXURE-R1(a) The true copy of Judgment dated 10.03.2023 in
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS PAPER REPORT PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI DATED 02.08.2022 IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-1
Annexure 11 TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS PAPER REPORT PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 02.08.2022 IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-11
-----
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!