Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Palani vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 33326 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33326 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Palani vs State Of Kerala on 15 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

    FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                      CRL.MC NO. 9117 OF 2024

 CRIME NO.206/2017 OF RAILWAY POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM, Ernakulam

        CC NO.794 OF 2017 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I,

                               ERNAKULAM

PETITIONER/ ACCUSED 1 & 2 :

    1      PALANI
           AGED 53 YEARS
           S/O SUDALAIMUTHU, 30/2,
           DISNERY STREET, MANGALKUDIIRUKKU,
           TACHANALLOOR, TIRUNELVELI,
           PIN - 627358

    2      M. MANIKANDAN
           AGED 42 YEARS
           S/O MARTHANDAN, 8/88,
           NORTH STREET, KOYILANKULAM, RADHAPURAM,
           TIRUNELVELI, PIN - 627116


           BY ADV PRAVEEN.H.


RESPONDENT/ STATE :

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2      SIDDHIQ
           AGED 50 YEARS
           S/O ALIKUNJU, PALOTTUDAROOL,
           MUNEER HOUSE, THRIKOVILVATTOM,
           KOLLAM, PIN - 691005


           BY ADVS.
           SNEHA M.S.
           ABHIJITH E.R.
 CRL.MC NO. 9117 OF 2024

                              2



                                                2024:KER:85911


          SMT. SREEJA V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 9117 OF 2024

                                      3



                                                            2024:KER:85911
                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                       Crl.M.C.No.9117 of 2024
                    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
               Dated this the 15th day of November, 2024


                                  ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482

Cr.P.C to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused 1 & 2 in C.C. No.794 of 2017 on the

files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Ernakulam, arising out

of Crime No.206 of 2017 of Railway Police Station, Ernakulam, registered

for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 341 r/w Section 34

of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The 2nd respondent is the defacto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 11.04.2017

assaulted the defacto complainant while he was travelling on the

Tirunelveli Happa Express and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering

the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing

the proceedings.

CRL.MC NO. 9117 OF 2024

2024:KER:85911

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10

SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High

Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This

view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab

and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v.

State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 affidavit filed by the 2 nd

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case.

There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.

No.794 of 2017 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I,

Ernakulam are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM CRL.MC NO. 9117 OF 2024

2024:KER:85911

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :

Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT NO.

314/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAILWAY POLICE STATION BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ERNAKULAM DATED 31/07/2024

Annexure A2 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN CRL. M.C 6329/2018 DATED 22/10/2024

Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18/10/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter