Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kerala State Cashew Development ... vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 32698 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32698 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Kerala State Cashew Development ... vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, ... on 12 November, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                                           2024:KER:84484

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                         PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

 TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1946

                 WP(C) NO. 39340 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

        KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,
        REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
        P.B.NO.13, CASHEW HOUSE,
        MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM, PIN - 691001


         BY ADVS.
         SRI.VIPIN P.VARGHESE, SC, KERALA STATE CASHEW
         DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
         SRI.ADARSH MATHEW
         SRI.ANIRUDH G. KAMATH
         SRI.AGUSTHO NORBERT
         SMT.ANNA B.



RESPONDENT:

         REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
         KOCHI
         REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAWAN,
         KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682017

         BY ADV S.PRASANTH
         SRI. SAJEEV KUMAR K. GOPAL,SC

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP           FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME           DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                  2024:KER:84484
WP(C) NO.39340 OF 2024

                               2




                          JUDGMENT

Dated this the 12th day of November, 2024

The petitioner is a Corporate Entity fully owned by the

Government of Kerala and operates 30 cashew factories

across the State. The respondent is an authorized officer of

the Employee's Provident Fund Organisation with the

authority to impose interest under Section 7Q of the

Employee's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions

Act, 1952.

2. The writ petition has been filed seeking instalment

based remittance of interest amounting to ₹11,42,525/-

under Section 7Q of the Employees Provident Funds and

Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 specifically for Factory

No.7 of the petitioner situated at Nooranad, Alappuzha. This

interest is computed in respect of remittance for the period 2024:KER:84484 WP(C) NO.39340 OF 2024

01.08.2018 to 31.03.2024. Order No.KR / KCH / 1152 /

Damages / Proceedings / 2023-2024 seeking the payment of

interest was passed by the respondent on 07.06.2024.

3. The delay in the payment of contributions under

the Act, 1952 is attributed solely to the financial constraints

faced by the petitioner and is not a result of willful

non-compliance. The entirety of funds available in the

Corporation's current account represents the sole Working

Capital currently allocated by the Government. Any coercive

measures taken to attach funds from this account would

result in substantial loss to the Corporation, closure of

factories and the consequent loss of livelihoods for over a

thousand individuals, contends the petitioner.

4. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf

of Employees Provident Fund Organisation and resisted the

writ petition. The Standing Counsel submitted that the

petitioner has deliberately defaulted in making Provident 2024:KER:84484 WP(C) NO.39340 OF 2024

Fund contribution in respect of their employees. In spite of

repeated reminders, the petitioner did not remit the dues. It

is in such circumstances that Section 7Q proceedings were

initiated. However, taking into consideration the fact that the

petitioner is a State Public Sector Undertaking, a breathing

time can be granted to the petitioner for remitting the dues,

submitted the Standing Counsel.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that the

petitioner is a State Public Sector Undertaking and the

petitioner has been making Provident Fund remittances

otherwise promptly, I am of the view that instalment facility

can be granted to the petitioner to clear the dues as reflected

in Ext.P1.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of permitting

the petitioner to remit the dues as per Ext.P1 in 12

consecutive and equal monthly instalments. The first of such

instalments shall be paid on or before 16.12.2024. It is made 2024:KER:84484 WP(C) NO.39340 OF 2024

clear that if the petitioner commits two consecutive defaults

in making payments as directed above, the respondent will

be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh 2024:KER:84484 WP(C) NO.39340 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 39340/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT'S ORDER NOKR/ KCH/ 1152/ DAMAGES/ PROCEEDINGS/ 2023-24 DATED 07.06.2024

Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROFIT AND LOSS STATEMENT PERTAINING TO 2018-2019 YEAR

Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS PERTAINING TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020

Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS OF THE 2020-2021 YEAR

Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS OF 2021-2022

Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROFIT AND LOSS STATEMENTS OF THE APPELLANT OF THE YEAR 2022-2023

Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.03.2023 IN W.P.C 8091 OF 2023 PASSED BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter