Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Praveen Chandran vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 32111 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32111 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Praveen Chandran vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 8221 OF 2024
                                         1




                                                         2024:KER:83162
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

    THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                              CRL.MC NO. 8221 OF 2024

       CRIME NO.3269/2016 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM

             AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.97 OF 2019 OF

 ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT,KOTTARAKKARA

                          ..................................

PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
           PRAVEEN CHANDRAN, AGED 48 YEARS
           S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAN,
           CHANDRAKANTHAM VEEDU, NEELESWARAM P O,
           KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 505.


               BY ADVS.
               PREEJA V.P.
               V.P.PRASANTH
               JOBY AUGUSTINE V.J.




RESPONDENT/STATE AND DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :
     1     STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI - 682 031.

       2       JYOTHISH, AGED 42 YEARS
               S/O. VIJAYAN, PANAVILA VEEDU,
               NEELESWARAM (P.O), NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE,
               KOTTARAKKARA TALUK,
               KOLLAM DISTICT, PIN - 691 505.

               SRI.AJIN JOHN MATHEW, R2
               SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)
THIS       CRIMINAL   MISC.    CASE   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
07.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8221 OF 2024
                                                   2




                                                                                 2024:KER:83162
                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                          ......................................................
                                   Crl.M.C.No.8221 of 2024
                           ...................................................
                    Dated this the 7th day of November, 2024


                                               ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; to quash all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.97/2019 on the files of the Assistant

Sessions Court, Kottarakara, arising out of Crime No.3269/2016 of

Kottarakkara Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections

341, 294(b), 323, 326, 308 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The second respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 19.12.2016 restrained

the de facto complainant and assaulted him, inflicting grievous injuries,

thereby committing the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for

the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has

been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner ought to be

quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences

alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. CRL.MC NO. 8221 OF 2024

2024:KER:83162

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the

Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take

note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the

wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was

reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another

[(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of

Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-C affidavit filed by the second respondent. The

learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is

understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto complainant

stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been

settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no

impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the

proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in S.C.No.97/2019 on

the files of the Assistant Sessions Court, Kottarakara, are quashed.

Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/11/11/2024 CRL.MC NO. 8221 OF 2024

2024:KER:83162

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 3269/2016 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE DATED 21/12/2016

ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY THE POLICE DATED 15.11.2017 WHICH IS PRESENTLY NUMBERED AS SC NO: 97 OF 2019 PENDING BEFORE ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT KOTTARAKKARA

ANNEXURE C AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 03.10.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter