Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31766 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
2024:KER:82680
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 15TH KARTHIKA,
1946
RP NO. 1167 OF 2024
JUDGMENT DATED 27.06.2024
ARISING FROM : WP(C) NO.224 OF 2024
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/3RD RESPONDENT:
NAJEEB
AGED 44 YEARS
VATTAPARAMBIL KOLLAMKUDY HOUSE,
VENGOLA KARA ARACKAPPADY VILLAGE,
KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, VENGOLA P.O
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683556.
BY ADVS.
JESTIN MATHEW
BASIL KURIAKOSE
EVIN SAVIOUR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER 1 AND 2 /RESPONDENTS 1,2 AND 5:
1 MAKKAR
VATTAPARAMBIL KOLLAMKUDY HOUSE,
VENGOLA KARA, ARACKAPPADY VILLAGE,
KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, VENGOLA P.O
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683556.
2024:KER:82680
RP NO. 1167 OF 2024 in
WP(C)No.224/2024
-2-
2 ASIYA UMMA
VATTAPARAMBIL KOLLAMKUDY HOUSE, VENGOLA KARA,
ARACKAPPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,
VENGOLA P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683556.
3 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION,
PERUMBAVOOR P.O, PIN - 683542
5 TALUK SURVEYOR
KUNNATHUNADU TALUK OFFICE
CIVIL STATION, PERUMBAVOOR,
PERUMBAVOOR P.O, PIN - 683542
SRI.V.RAJENDRAN
SRI.P.M.SHAMEER, GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 06.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:82680
RP NO. 1167 OF 2024 in
WP(C)No.224/2024
-3-
ORDER
Interestingly, Sri.Jestin Mathew - learned
counsel for the petitioner, affirms that the
judgment of this Court is without error; but
still prays that it be reviewed to the extent to
which it has granted police protection to the
employees of the Writ Petitioner. He explained
that, since the word 'employees' has been
incorporated, the writ petitioners are misusing
it, by informing the Police that they are
entitled to make construction.
2. Sri.V.Rajendran - learned counsel
for the writ petitioners, however, submitted
that this petition is not merely confutative,
but rather facile. He argued that this Court has 2024:KER:82680 RP NO. 1167 OF 2024 in
not specifically permitted any construction, but
has only directed the parties to act as per law;
and hence that this Review Petition is
unnecessary.
3. There is force in the afore
submissions of Sri.V.Rajendran, because, as is
also conceded by Sri.Jestin Mathew, this Court
has not permitted any person to make
construction or otherwise. If there is any
violation of any direction of the Court, it is
for the Review Petitioner to invoke appropriate
remedies as per law.
This Review Petition is thus closed.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv 2024:KER:82680 RP NO. 1167 OF 2024 in
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A JUDGMENT IN CON.CASE(C) NO.2072/2024 DATED 16/10/2024 DELIVERED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE A.
ANNEXURE B THE DECREE DATED 30/01/2015PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR IN OS NO.91/2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER'S FATHER.
ANNEXURE C COMMON ORDER DATED 08/01/2021 ISSUED BY THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF,
ANNEXURE D LETTER DATED 30/10/2024 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER
ANNEXURE E POLICE PROTECTION COMPLAINT DATED 31/10/2024 REQUESTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE F INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) NO.38576/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!