Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Zamorin Raja vs The Government Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 31486 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31486 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Zamorin Raja vs The Government Of Kerala on 5 November, 2024

Author: Anil K.Narendran

Bench: Anil K.Narendran

                                             2024:KER:82627



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

                             &

         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024/14TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                 W.P.(C) NO. 26934 OF 2013

PETITIONER:

          ZAMORIN RAJA
          CENTRAL DEVASWOM, TALI, RESIDING AT SOUDHAM,
          THIRUVANNOOR, CALICUT - 673 029.

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN
          SMT.M.H.BINDU




RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY REVENUE, (DEVASWOM
          DEPARTMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
          MALAPPURAM - 676 505.

    3     THE COMMISSIONER HR CE
          MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, HOUSE FED
          COMPLEX,ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 693 036.
                                               2024:KER:82627

                               2
W.P.(C) No.26934 of 2013




     4       KARIPPALLY BHARATHAN [DIED]*
             S/O. VELAYUDHAN, ALANCHERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY
             TALUK, THRISSUR - 679 532.

     5*      SHYLAJA
             W/O KARIPPALI BHARATHAN, 'SREEHARSHA', NEENDOOR
             HOUSE, THALASSERY P.O, THALAPPILLY TALUK,
             THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 679532.

     6*      HARSHINI
             D/O KARIPPALI BHARATHAN, 'SREEHARSHA',
             KARIPPALI HOUSE, THALASSERY P.O, THALAPPILLY
             TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 679532.

             *Are IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R5 & R6 AS PER ORDER
             DATED 24.10.2024 IN I.A 1/2020 IN THE WP(C)


             BY ADVS.
             SRI. S. RAJMOHAN, SR. GP
             SMT.RANJINIE, SC FOR MDB
             SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM
             BOARD
             SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD
             SRI.KRISHNAKUMAR.S, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD
             SRI.MAHESH V.RAMAKRISHNAN, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM
             BOARD
             SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL



         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL
HEARING ON 24.10.2024, THE COURT ON 05.11.2024 DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                                             2024:KER:82627

                                        3
W.P.(C) No.26934 of 2013


         ANIL K. NARENDRAN & P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
      -----------------------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.26934 of 2013
      -----------------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 5th day of November, 2024

                                JUDGMENT

P.G.Ajithkumar, J.

The petitioner is the trustee of Alathiyur Perumthrikkovil

Devaswom (Alathiyur Hanuman Temple), Poilassery. 23.5

cents of property belonging to the 4th respondent was

acquired for the purpose of the Temple. After completion of

the acquisition proceedings and taking over possession, the

Government issued Ext.P6 cancelling the acquisition

proceedings. Seeking to set aside Ext.P6 order, this writ

petition has been filed invoking the provisions under Article

226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The 2nd respondent has filed a counter-affidavit.

The matters connecting to the acquisition and the

circumstances leading to issuance of Ext.P6 order are

narrated in paragraph Nos.5 to 8 in the counter-affidavit,

which are extracted below:

2024:KER:82627

"5. It is submitted that the draft award was approved as per the order No.LA4-15074/2010 dated 26.03.2013 and the award has been passed by the Special Tahsildar, LA(General), Tirur on 26.03.2012 vide Award No.01/ 2013 dated 26.03.2013. As per the award, the total compensation awarded was Rs.8,91,228/- (including land value, value of improvements, value of structures, 12% increase on market value and 30% solatium). The entire compensation awarded was deposited in the Sub Court, Tirur. Statutory notices under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act and the Form 12 notices were issued to Sri. Bharathan by the Land Acquisition Officer through registered post and through the Village Officer, Arangottukara. The registered letter was sent back by the Postal Authorities saying that the address is out of India. The Village Officer, Arangottukara has served the above statutory notices by fixing the copy on the outer door of the house of Sri. Bharathan, accordingly service of the statutory notice was done under Section 45(3) of the Land Acquisition Act on 16.04.2013.

6. It is submitted that after completing the land acquisition procedure in the case, 0.0950 Hectors of land in Re-Sy. No.139/21 (Old 139/6) of Triprangode Village of Tirur Taluk has been handed over to the requisitioning authority on 22.04.2013.

7. It is submitted that Sri. Karippali Bharathan represented by Power of Attorney Holder, Narayanan, 2024:KER:82627

Karippali, Thrissur has filed W.P.(C). No.11327/2013 before the Hon'ble High Court praying to stay all further proceedings pursued to land acquisition proceedings initiated in this land acquisition case. The statement of facts has already been filed in this case, saying that the entire land acquisition proceedings has been completed and the land has been handed over to the Requisitioning Authority on 22.04.2013. The said Writ Petition is still pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.

8. It is submitted that, in the meanwhile, the Government in its order No.4558/13/RD dated 17.08.2013 has cancelled the Government Order No.3717/2010/RD dated 31.07.2010 by which sanction has been issued to invoke urgency clause under Section 17 of the Act for the acquisition of 0.0950 Hectares of land in Re-Sy. No. 139/6 of Triprangode Village in favour of Alathiyur Perumthrikovil Devaswom. Since the land acquisition proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act and Rules had already been completed and the land has been handed over to the Requisitioning Authority, clarification has been sought for from Government regarding the further action to be taken in this case."

3. The 4th respondent expired on 26.09.2020 and his

legal representatives were impleaded as additional

respondents Nos.5 and 6. No counter-affidavit was filed by

them.

2024:KER:82627

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

learned Senior Government Pleader. The learned counsel for

additional respondents No.5 and 6 did not turn up to make

their submissions.

5. Ext.P5 is the award relating to acquisition of 23.5

cents of lands belonging to the 4th respondent. The 2nd

respondent categorically averred that possession of the

property was taken and handed over to the requisitioning

authority, the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner

would submit that the amount of award was deposited by the

petitioner long before issuance of Ext.P6 and possession of

the property was handed over to the petitioner. It was

thereafter Ext.P6 was issued by the Government, that too,

without giving any notice to the petitioner. It is accordingly

submitted that Ext.P6 is totally illegal and liable to be set

aside.

6. The Apex Court in City Montessori School v.

State of U.P. [(2009) 14 SCC 253] held that the State

Government is obliged to give an opportunity to the 2024:KER:82627

requisitioning authority to show cause why the order of

acquisition is withdrawn. The 2nd respondent does not have a

case that before issuing Ext.P6, a notice was given to the

petitioner. For that reason itself, Ext.P6 is liable to be set

aside.

7. A similar situation confronted a Division Bench of

this Court in W.A.No.492 of 2006 [V.M.Gopakumar v.

Zamorian Raja of Calicut - Judgment dated 24.03.2006].

There also the acquisition was for a Temple. After completing

the proceedings for acquisition, the same was cancelled by

the Government. Challenge was to that order. The Division

Bench held that the Government initiated the proceedings for

acquisition on convincing the necessity to have that property

for the Temple and the Government subsequently (Ext.P4),

could not cancel the order unless there are sufficient materials

to show that the acquisition proceedings were vitiated by

malafides. None of the respondents has a case that for such a

reason the acquisition proceedings were cancelled as per

Ext.P6. In the circumstances, we are of the view that Ext.P6 is 2024:KER:82627

not legally or factually sustainable. Therefore, Ext.P6 is liable

to be set aside.

In the result, the writ petition is allowed and Ext.P6 is

set aside.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE dkr 2024:KER:82627

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26934/2013

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 31/07/2010 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT INVOKING THE URGENCY CALUSE OF SECTION 7 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT.

EXHIBIT-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED BY THE IST RESPONDENT IN THE GAZETTE DATED 14/07/2011.


EXHIBIT-P3                 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION UNDER
                           SECTION    4    (1)    PUBLISHED     IN

DESHABHIMANI DAILY DATED 22/07/2011.

EXHIBIT-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SECTION 6 NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN DESABHIMANI NEWS PAPER DATED 12/09/2012.

EXHIBIT-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD 01/2013, NO. A 298/2010 DATED 26/03/2013.

EXHIBIT-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/08/2013 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT CANCELLING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS FOR ACQUISITION.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter