Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rasheeda Beevi vs Managing Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 31411 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31411 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Rasheeda Beevi vs Managing Director on 2 November, 2024

Author: Murali Purushothaman

Bench: Murali Purushothaman

                                                       2024:KER:81461
                                   1
WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

   SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                         WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019

PETITIONER/S:

          RASHEEDA BEEVI,
          AGED 59 YEARS
          W/O. JAMALUDHEEN, SEENA MANZIL, PERUMPUZHA P.O, KOLLAM
          691 504.

          BY ADVS.
          MATHEW JAMES
          SMT.A.M.FOUSI


RESPONDENTS:

    1     MANAGING DIRECTOR,
          THE KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, (A
          GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING) CASHEW HOUSE, P.B NO.
          13, MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM 691 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS
          MANAGING DIRECTOR.

    2     THE PERSONNEL MANAGER,
          KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, (A
          GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING) CASHEW HOUSE, P.B NO.
          13, MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM 691 001


          BY ADV SRI.VIPIN P.VARGHESE

  THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION         ON
02.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                               2024:KER:81461
                                     2
WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019




                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner was working as grading labourer

under the 1st respondent. According to the petitioner, her

her date of birth has been wrongly entered in service

records as 15.06.1956 instead of 30.05.1960. By Ext.P4

communication, the petitioner was asked to retire from

service on attaining the age of 60 years i.e. on

31.12.2016. The petitioner challenged Ext.P4 before this

Court by filing W.P.(c) No.16881/2018. The said writ

petition was disposed of vide Ext.P5 Judgment directing

the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation

submitted by the petitioner. Pursuant thereto, the 1st

respondent passed Ext.P6 order rejecting the claim of

the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is filed for

the following reliefs:-

i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other

appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for 2024:KER:81461

WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019

the records leading to the issuance of Ext.P6,

and quash the same;

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other

appropriate writ, order or direction, directing

the respondents to permit the petitioner to

continue in service, as per Ext.P2 birth

certificate till she attains the age of 60;

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 1 st

respondent and paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit

reads as follows:-

"From the above, the petitioner admits and

affirms that she entered into service on 13.3.1974

and her date of birth as she claims is 30.05.1960.

It is therefore obvious that she joined KSCDC at

the age of 14 years and sufficient to draw an

inference that, the petitioner had a clear

knowledge of her joining KSCDC at the age of 14

years, suppressed that fact and fraudulently

manufactured a document to befit the age criteria

for recruitment of candidates at the time of entry

into service. The proceedings initiated against the 2024:KER:81461

WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019

petitioner is according to the laws and norms

adopted by the Corporation."

I find substance in the contentions in the counter

affidavit. Further, even going by the case of the

petitioner, she is presently 64 years old and no relief can

be granted. I find no merit in the writ petition and

accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/-.

2024:KER:81461

WP(C) NO. 9676 OF 2019

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9676/2019

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 16-09-

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DTD 05-06- 2017 ISSUED BY THE ELAMPALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SERVICE DETAILS OF THE PETITIONER GIVEN BY THE PROVIDENT AUTHORITY EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

CDC/PRL/P1/RETIREMENT/ 2016 DTD 31-12-2016 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 24-10-2018 IN W.P(C) NO. 16881 OF 2018 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. CDEC/PRL/P4/WPC 16881/18/2018 DTD 19-12-2018 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT CORPORATION

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R2(a): THE TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(P) NO.45/91/P & ARD DATED 30/12/1991. EXHIBIT R2(b): THE TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR NO.11980/SC3/87/P & ARD DATED 3RD DEC.1987.

EXHIBIT R2(c): THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.CDC/PRL/P2/04 DATED 11/01/2005. EXHIBIT R2(d): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ELAMPALLOOR MUSLIM JAMA-ATH DATED 12/09/2014.

EXHIBIT R2(e): THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.CDC/PRL/P1/AGE DISPUTE DATED 14/10/2014.

EXHIBIT R2(f): THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.B4-7820/14 DATED 28/10/2014.

EXHIBIT R2(g): TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 29/12/2016.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter