Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdussalam P.T vs The Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 13844 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13844 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Abdussalam P.T vs The Union Of India on 28 May, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
        TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 11934 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

            ABDUSSALAM P.T.
            AGED 38 YEARS
            S/O.CHEKKAMMU HAJI, AGED 38 YEARS, ARIMBRA HOUSE,
            AMARAMBALAM SOUTH, MALAPPURAM - CORRECTED
            ADDRESS:PADHINHARETHALA
            HOUSE,THENCHERI,POOVATHIKKAL,URANGATTIRI,
            MALAPPURAM -673 639 ,CORRECTED AS PER ORDER DATED
            5.4.2024 IN I.A.1/2024, PIN - 679 339

            BY ADVS.
            EBIN MATHEW
            P.J.MATHEW
            AKHILA SHOJI
RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE UNION OF INDIA
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
            NEW DELHI -, PIN - 110001
    2       THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
            REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR, HEAD OFFICE, MUMBAI,
            MAHARASHTRA -, PIN - 400029
    3       CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
            AMRELI, SAVARKUNDLA TOWN,GUJARAT-
            REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PIN - 365601
    4       THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
            POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -, PIN - 695014
    5       SOUTH INDIAN BANK
            EDAVANNA BRANCH,PARARI COMPLEX,CENTRAL
            BAZAR,EDAVANNA,MALAPPURAM
            REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN - 676541
            BY ADVS.
            SUNIL SHANKAR A
            VIDYA GANGADHARAN(K/000424/2020)

            SRI. V. GIRISH KUMAR, CGC.
            SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP.
    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 11934 OF 2024
                                           2




                               T.R.RAVI.J
            -------------------------------------------------------
                       WP(C) No.11934 of 2024
          --------------------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024

                                   JUDGMENT

The petitioner is holder of an account with the respondents

Bank and his account has been frozen on intimation by Police

Authorities. The Court had, at the time of admission, issued

interim directions to restrict the freezing of the accounts to the

amount which had been subject matter of the dispute, as per the

intimation received from the Police authorities. The Bank has

also taken action to that extent pursuant to the directions issued

by this Court. In similar cases, this Court had after issuance of

such interlocutory orders, closed the writ petitions with certain

directions. Paragraph No.12 of the directions issued in Dr.Sajeer

v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2023 KHC OnLine 661] is extracted

hereunder;

"12. In fact, should the criminal enquiry found otherwise, it will be doubtful if the amounts in question could be even recovered WP(C) NO. 11934 OF 2024

from the petitioners, if they have received it as part of bonafide or other valid transactions, unaware of it being proceeds of crime.

In the conspectus of the above, I order these Writ Petitions with the following directions:

a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts of the respective petitioners, only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This shall be done forthwith, so as to enable the petitioners to deal with their accounts, and transact therein, beyond that limit.

b. The respondent - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the respective Banks as to whether freezing of accounts of the petitioners in these Writ Petitions will require to be continued even in the afore manner; and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

c. On the Banks receiving the afore information/intimation from the Police Authorities, they will adhere with it and complete necessary action - either continuing the freeze for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

d. If, however, no information or intimation is received by their Banks in terms of directions (b) above, the petitioners or such among them, will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for which purpose, all their contentions in these Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to them, to impel in future."

This writ petition is disposed of with the above said

directions.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI

JUDGE sn WP(C) NO. 11934 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11934/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit p-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 12-03-2024 Exhibit P-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14/03/2024 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT BANK Exhibit P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12/03/2024 Exhibit P-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 05/06/2023 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP(C)18199 OF 2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter