Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13756 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 18663 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:
1 JOHN V.C.
AGED 71 YEARS
S/O. JOHN V.J., VALAVATH HOUSE, THEKKENADA P.O.,
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686141
2 PAULSON JOSEPH
AGED 62 YEARS
S/O JOSEPH, VALIYATHARAYIL, CHEMMANATHUKARA P.O.,
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686608
BY ADV K.C.VINCENT
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
2 THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION
3RD FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
PIN - 695033
3 THE RETURNING OFFICER
VAIKOM TALUK CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. NO.K 951, MIDUKKI ENTERPRISES
BUILDING, KACHERIKAVALA, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM, UNIT
INSPECTOR, VAIKOM, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(GENERAL), VAIKOM, PIN - 686141
4 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
KOTTAYAM, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002
5 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686608
6 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
POLICE STATION, VAIKOM, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN -
686608
7 VAKKACHAN MANNATHALI
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O K.K. JOSEPH, MANNATHALIL HOUSE, AMBIKA MARKET
P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686144
8 JOSE JAMES
AGED 54 YEARS
WP(C) NO. 18663 OF 2024 2
S/O JAMES, PULIYALAKKAL HOUSE, ARUNNOOTTIMANGALAM
P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686604
9 VAIKOM TALUK CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. NO.K 951
MIDUKKI ENTERPRISES BUILDING, KACHERIKAVALA, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 686141
10 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
695010
SMT.REKHA C.NAIR - SR. GP
SRI.C.M.NAZAR
SRI.SHIHABUDHEEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 18663 OF 2024 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners who are stated to be the members of the Vaikom
Taluk Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd.
('Bank' for short) say that the elections to its Managing Committee has
been marred by various acts of violence and disruptions; and therefore,
that they have been constrained to approach this Court, seeking that
the Police offer necessary protection for its last stage, which is
scheduled on 30.05.2024.
2. Sri.K.C.Vincent - learned counsel for the petitioners explained
that, even when polling was attempted on earlier occasions, there were
obstructions caused, in spite of the fact that orders for police protection
had been issued; and therefore, that it is now incumbent that the Police
be directed to afford adequate and effective protection on 30.05.2024.
He added that the 2nd prayer of his clients, namely that the 3rd
respondent - Returning Officer be directed to videograph the entry
points and premises of the polling station till the end of polling on
30.05.2024, also becomes relevant and important in the afore factual
scenario.
3. Sri.C.M.Nazar - learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd
respondent - State Co-operative Election Commission, submitted that
this writ petition is unnecessary, particularly with respect to prayer
No.1; while it is not maintainable as regards prayer No.3. He explained
that his client is in full charge of the conduct of the elections and that
they have also requisitioned the Police to offer assistance, which will be
given; and therefore, that the petitioners need not have approached this
Court as regards prayer No.1. Coming to Prayer No.2, he submitted
that if the petitioners want the premises to be videographed, it can be
done during the entire process, provided the expenses for the same is
met by them.
4. Sri.Shihabudeen - learned counsel for respondent No.9 - Bank,
submitted that his client also wants the elections to be completed
without any unsavory event; and therefore, that they will not stand in
the way of appropriate orders being issued by this Court.
5. The endorsement on file show that summons to respondents 7
and 8 have been validly served. However, they are neither present in
person today, nor represented through counsel.
6. When one adverts to the afore rival positions of the parties, it is
evident that it is common cause that the elections to the Managing
Committee of the Bank is to be conducted without any let or
interference on 30.05.2024. Since all the parties are ad idem on this, I
have no doubt that the petitioners are entitled to relief in the following
manner:
(a) The respondents 4 to 6 are directed to afford adequate and
effective protection, using sufficient number of police personnel, to
ensure that the elections to the Managing Committee of the 9 th
respondent - Bank is able to be completed by the 3 rd respondent -
Returning Officer, in a peaceful and decorous manner on 30.05.2024;
and also to ensure that all illegal obstructions and interdictions are
prevented and removed, using necessary force, to the fullest warrant of
law.
(b) The 3rd respondent will videograph the entry points in the
premises of the polling station at the Government Girls Higher
Secondary School and Government Girls High School, Vaikom, from
8.00 a.m., till the end of polling on 30.05.2024, adverting to Rule 35A(6)
(n)(ix) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules. For this purpose, they
will be at liberty to requisition the expense of the same from the
petitioners, as is now conceded to by them. For this purpose, the
competent Authority of the 3rd respondent will inform the petitioners
about the amount to be expended by them not later than 3.00 p.m. on
29.05.2024, which will be remitted by the former not later than 12.00
noon on 30.05.2024.
(c) As regards the prayer of the petitioners to appoint an Advocate
Observer, this Court finds no reason to do so, in view of the afore
directions; but caution the Election Commission that since the conduct
of the elections without any let or interference is primarily their
responsibility, every measure and steps, even in addition to the afore
directions, will be taken by them, including by requisitioning any
further assistance from the Police, for which full liberty is reserved to
them.
This writ petition is thus ordered.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/28.5
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18663/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, KERALA STATE CO-
OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION DATED
18.05.2024
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
04.07.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO. 20801 OF 2022
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT DATED 08.01.2024 IN W.P.(C) NO. 22503 OF 2022 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.
2913 OF 2024 DATED 29.02.2024 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 22.03.2024 IN W.P.(C) NO. 2913 OF 2024 AND CONT CASE © NO. 662 OF 2024 Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 20.05.2024 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT WITH COPIES TO THE 4TH AND 5TH RESPONDENTS Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 20.05.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!