Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.M.Ravi vs Helan K. Lazar
2024 Latest Caselaw 13674 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13674 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.M.Ravi vs Helan K. Lazar on 27 May, 2024

Author: Kauser Edappagath

Bench: Kauser Edappagath

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
    MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       OP(C) NO. 1814 OF 2021
     ORDERIN IA 760/2019 IN CMA NO.15/19 & CMA 15/19 OF
               ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, OTTAPALAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

            K.M.RAVI, AGED 51 YEARS
            S/O. SOMASUNDARAN K.M., MANASAROVAR, KIZHAKKEKARA,
            MANISSERY, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

            BY ADVS.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
            J.RAMKUMAR


RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & DEFENDANTS:

    1       HELAN K. LAZAR,AGED 76 YEARS, W/O. LAZAR,
            THAINIKUNNATH VEETTIL, MAKKADA AMSOM, KAKKODI
            VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673010.

    2       SHINE, AGED 38 YEARS
            S/O. GANGANDHARAN, THOTTINGAL HOUSE, KALLIPADAM,
            SHORANUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679122.

            BY ADV V.B.RAMANUNNI




     THIS     OP   (CIVIL)    HAVING   COME   UP    FOR    ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2024,    THE    COURT    ON   THE   SAME     DAY    DELIVERED    THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C).No.1814/2021

                                        -:2:-



                                JUDGMENT

Exts.P9 and P10 orders passed by the Additional District Judge,

(for short 'the appellate court') Ottapalam are under challenge in this

original petition.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the

defendants in O.S.No.165/2009 on the files of the Munsiff's Court,

Ottapalam (for short 'the trial court'). The suit was one for permanent

prohibitory injunction. When the suit was listed for trial on 5.3.2018,

by the trial court, the 1 st defendant filed an application seeking

adjournment on the ground that she was suffering from diarrhea from

3.3.2018. The said application was dismissed. The 1 st defendant was

set ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was passed. Thereafter, the 1 st

defendant filed I.A.No.1002/2018 to set aside the ex-parte decree.

The trial court dismissed the application as per Ext.P7 order.

Challenging the said order, the 1 st defendant preferred CMA

No.15/2019 with an application to condone the delay as

I.A.No.760/2019 before the appellate court. The appellate court

allowed I.A.No.760/2019 as also the C.M.A. and the application to set

aside the ex-parte decree on payment of cost of ₹15,000/- to the

plaintiff. It is challenging the order in I.A.No.760/2019 as well as the

judgment in C.M.A.No.15/2019 this original petition has been filed.

3. Heard both sides.

When the suit was listed for trial, the 1 st defendant has filed an

application seeking adjournment stating that she was laid up due to

diarrhea. A medical certificate was produced by the 1 st defendant

along with an application to set aside the ex-parte decree. However,

the medical certificate was not taken into account by the trial court.

According to the 1st defendant, she was laid up with fever and diarrhea

from 3.3.2018 and hence, she could not appear before the court. The

medical certificate shows that she was laid up from 2.3.2018 to

8.3.2018. The affidavit filed by the 1 st defendant coupled with the

medical certificate produced would show that there was sufficient

cause for her non appearance. I find no irregularity or impropriety in

the impugned order. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp

APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1814/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF PLAINT IN OS NO.165/2009 AND DATED 21/04/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT DATED 26/09/2009 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN EXHIBIT P1 SUIT.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 31/03/2018 IN OS NO.165/2009 PASSED BY MUNSIFF'S COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN IN SUPPORT OF IA NO.1002/2018 IN OS NO.165/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF COUNTER STATEMENT DATED 06/06/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXHIBIT P4 APPLICATION.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE THAT ACCOMPANIED IN IA NO.1004/2018 IN OS NO.187/2009 AND DATED 02/03/2018.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 27/06/2019 IN IA NO.1002/2018 IN OS NO.165/2009 PASSED BY MUNSIFF'S COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 07/06/2018 IN AS NO.37/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 13/08/2021 IN IA NO.760/2019 IN CMA NO.15/2019 PASSED BY ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 13/08/2019 IN CMA NO.15/2019 PASSED BY ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, OTTAPALAM.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter