Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

*Expired, Krishnan N.T vs The District Collector
2024 Latest Caselaw 13319 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13319 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

*Expired, Krishnan N.T vs The District Collector on 23 May, 2024

WP(C) No.18627/2022                     1/3

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
              Thursday, the 23rd day of May 2024 / 2nd Jyaishta, 1946
                  UNNUMB.IA.NO.1/2024 IN WP(C) NO. 18627 OF 2022
   APPLICANTS/PETITIONER & ADDITIONAL 2ND PETITIONER:

      1. KRISHNAN N.T (DIED), AGED 78 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN, NELLIKKOTT
         THARAMMAL POTTA HOUSE, RAMANATTUKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673
         633.
      2. PRADEEP N.T, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN N.T, RESIDING AT NELLIKKOTT
         THARAMMAL POTTA HOUSE, RAMANATTUKARA P.O.,KOZHIKKODE, DISTRICT 673
         633. * LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED PETITIONER IS IMPLEADED AS SECOND
         PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DATED 08-08-2023 IN IA 4/2023.

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

      1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, KOZHIKODE
         COLLECTORATE,CIVIL STATION P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 020.
      2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT -
         673 020.
      3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, RAMANATTUKARA VILLAGE, RAMANATTUKARA - FAROOK
         COLLEGE ROAD, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 633.
      4. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673
         020.
      5. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE NATONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
         PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT (PIU) KOZHIKODE, PROVIDENCE WOMENS
         COLLEGE ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 673 009.
      6. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
         CHAIRMAN, G-586, SECTOR-10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI - 110 075.

        Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
   affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to extend the interim
   order dated 08/06/2022,further extended on 19/04/2024 vide judgment dated
   19/04/2024 till the disposal of Ext.P25 on the files of the Writ
   Petition.
        This Application coming on for orders on 23.05.2024 upon perusing
   the application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon
   hearing the arguments of ABDUL JAWAD K., A.GRANCY JOSE, Advocates for the
   petitioners and of GOVERNMENT PLEADER for R1 to R4, K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN
   Advocate for R5 & R6, and this court's Judgment dated 19/04/2024, the
   court passed the following:
                                                 (P.T.O)
 WP(C) No.18627/2022                             2/3




                                   VIJU ABRAHAM , J.
                        ===========================
                            Unnumb. I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2024
                                           in
                               WP(C) No. 18627 of 2022
                        ============================
                          Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024

                                                ORDER

The above writ petition was disposed of as per judgment dated

09.04.2024 granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate

authority to challenge the resurvey conducted. To facilitate a challenge

before the appellate authority, this Court ordered that the interim order

granted by this Court on 08.06.2022 will remain in force for a further

period of one month from 19.04.2024.

It is seen that the petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal. Since

this Court has granted extension of the interim order granted on

08.06.2022 for a further period of one month only to facilitate the

petitioner to approach the statutory authority, I am of the view that the

petitioner cannot seek for extension of the said interim order stating that

the appellate proceedings have not been finalised. If the petitioner is

aggrieved by the delay in the finalisation of the appeal it is for the

petitioner to agitate the grievance in appropriate proceedings. Therefore

the defect noted by the registry is upheld.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

sbk/-

23-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18627/2022 Exhibit - P25 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 27/04/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOZHIKODE

23-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter