Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Noufal V.K vs Fathimathul Misriya
2024 Latest Caselaw 13251 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13251 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Noufal V.K vs Fathimathul Misriya on 23 May, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
   THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
                   CRL.MC NO. 3705 OF 2024
   CRIME NO.13/2022 OF KANNUR CITY POLICE STATION, KANNUR
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.708 OF 2022 OF
        JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KANNUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

    1     NOUFAL V.K
          AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. ABDULLA,
          PONNANJERI HOUSE, FATHIMA MANZIL,
          MUNDAYAD P.O, VARAM,
          KANNUR DT., PIN - 670594
    2     NAJEEMA V.K
          AGED 63 YEARS, W/O. ABDULLA,
          PONNANJERI HOUSE, MUNDAYAD P.O,
          VARAM, KANNUR DT., PIN - 670594
    3     SAMEERA V.K
          AGED 38 YEARS, D/O. ABDULLA,
          PONNANJERI HOUSE, MUNDAYAD P.O,
          VARAM, KANNUR DT., PIN - 670594
    4     SHANAVAS KOYYONTE VALAPP
          AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. HUSSAIN,
          KOYYONTE VALAPPIL, PALLIPPOYIL,
          MOUVANCHERI P.O, KANNUR DT., PIN - 670613
    5     MUNEER VELLUVAKKANDY
          AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. ABDULLA,
          PONNANJERI HOUSE, MUNDAYAD P.O,
          VARAM, KANNUR DT., PIN - 670594
          BY ADVS.
          M.MUHAMMED SHAFI
          T.RASINI
          ADHEELA NOWRIN

RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT & STATE:

    1     FATHIMATHUL MISRIYA
          AGED 25 YEARS, D/O RAFEEQUE,
          DHARUL HUDA (H), KADALAYI P.O,
          KANNUR DT., PIN - 670003
 Crl.M.C.No.3705 of 2024
                                :2:



     2       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
             BY ADV.
             SRI.RENJITH T.R. - PP
             SRI.ABU SIDDIK



      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.3705 of 2024
                                     :3:



                       BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                    ---------------------------------------
                         Crl.M.C. No.3705 of 2024
                    ---------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024


                                   ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are the accused in C.C. No.708/2022 on the files of

the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Kannur, arising out of Crime

No.13/2022 of Kannur City Police Station, registered for the offences

under Sections 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860. The 1st respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution the accused had physically and

mentally harrassed the defacto complainant and demanded money and

gold and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering

the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by

continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10

SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High

Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings.

This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of

Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and

Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A2 affidavit filed by the 1st

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the

defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that

the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this

case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.

No.708/2022 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II,

Kannur are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

anm

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 13 OF 2022 OF KANNUR CITY POLICE STATION Annexure A2 AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19-10-2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter