Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manshad vs District Police Chief, Kottayam
2024 Latest Caselaw 11868 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11868 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Manshad vs District Police Chief, Kottayam on 3 May, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                   &

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.

        FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 13TH VAISAKHA, 1946

                       WP(CRL.) NO. 465 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:


            MANSHAD
            AGED 32 YEARS
            S/O ABDUL RASHEED, PALLIVILAVEEDU,
            THUMBARAMUKKE, PALAMKONAM.P.O,
            PULLAMPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
            PIN - 695607

            BY ADVS.
            MITHUN P.
            HARISHMA P. THAMPI


RESPONDENT/S:


    1       DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KOTTAYAM,
            NEAR KOTTAYAM EAST POLICE STATION,
            DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, KOTTAYAM.,
            PIN - 686002

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            PALA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
            PIN - 686575

    3       DAVIES BASTIN
            S/O SEBASTIAN.D, PANACHIKAL HOUSE,
            ANTHINAD.P.O, LALAM (PART),
            KOTTAYAM, KERALA., PIN - 686651
 W.P.(Crl). No.465 of 2024       2


             BY ADVS.
             JULIAN XAVIER.J JOSEPH
             FIROZ K.ROBIN(F-15)
             JOSE. V.V. (THENGATHARA)(K/000039/2003)
             ROY JOSEPH(K/55/2006)
             ANIES MATHEW(K/952/2007)
             CHRISTEENA AUGUSTINE(K/000359/2024)
             SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE, GP


THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(Crl). No.465 of 2024           3


           DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & EASWARAN S. , JJ.
                     ------------------------------------
                        W.P.(Crl) No.465 of 2024
                     -----------------------------------
                  Dated this the 3rd day of May 2024


                                JUDGMENT

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.

The petitioner has moved this writ petition on the assertion that

he has married the alleged detenue; and that she is now being detained

against her wishes by the 3rd respondent, her brother.

2. However, the alleged detenue and the third respondent, along

with their aunt, appeared before us in person. The alleged detenue

emphatically submitted that she does not intend to continue with any

relationship with the petitioner and that she had acted naively in having

conceded to the registration of marriage, though that the same has

never been consummated. She also informed us that she intends to go

with her brother and that she is apprehensive because the petitioner

has certain photographs of hers, which he is now publishing on online

social platforms, including Facebook etc. She concluded saying that she

fears threats and intimidation from the petitioner; and sought that

liberty be reserved to her to approach the police, if required.

3. We, thereafter, interacted with the petitioner, who submitted

that he has filed this writ petition because he was under the impression

that the detenue wants to go with him, on the basis of the marriage

they had contracted. He conceded that if the detenue does not want to

continue with the relationship, he would not stand in the way; and that

he would take steps to have all her information, photographs and such

other details, removed from his personal platforms.

4. In fact, Sri. Sunil Kumar Kuriakose, the learned Government

Pleader, affirmed that if the detenue approaches the police with a

petition seeking that her information be ordered to be removed by the

petitioner, necessary action in this regard will be taken.

5. Taking note of the aforesaid, we dismiss this W.P.(Crl.),

recording the submissions made before us by the alleged detenue; with

a consequential liberty being reserved to her to approach the police in

case any personal information of hers still continues to be published in

the online platforms or on pages of the petitioner; and if she is to invoke

the same, the concerned police officer will ensure that necessary action

is taken without any delay.

As a corollary, we reserve liberty to the detenue to move the police

if she requires any protection; in which event, the competent authority

will ensure that it is afforded to the fullest warranty, without any

reservation.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

EASWARAN S. JUDGE

NS

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 465/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 07.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE MARRIAGE OFFICER, SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE VAMANAPURAM

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT, DATED 22/4/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter