Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Gafoor K.K vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 11852 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11852 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Abdul Gafoor K.K vs The State Of Kerala on 3 May, 2024

Author: Kauser Edappagath

Bench: Kauser Edappagath

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
    FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 13TH VAISAKHA, 1946
                  WP(C) NO. 16179 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

    1    ABDUL GAFOOR K.K
         AGED 48 YEARS
         S/O. KUNHABDULLA HAJI, KELAPPANKANDI HOUSE,
         KOTTAPPALLI, KOZHIKODE,, PIN - 673542

    2    ARUN SINGH
         AGED 32 YEARS
         C/O. RAJAN, POLIYEDATH HOUSE, PUTHENPEEDIKA,
         VADAKKUMMURI, ANTHICAD, THRISSUR,, PIN - 680642

         BY ADVS.AMALENDU N.S.
         BASIL MECHERY
         NIMISHA GEORGE


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY
         WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001

    2    THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZATION COMMITTEE FOR
         RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
         REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN/THE PRINCIPAL,
         GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, KALAMASSERRY P.O.,
         ERNAKULAM., PIN - 683104

    3    THE LOCAL LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR RENAL
         TRANSPLANTATION,REPRESENTED BY ITS
         CHAIRMAN/MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL,
         MG ROAD, PALLIMUKU, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682016
 WP(C) No.16179/2024

                           -:2:-

    4     DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          IRINJALAKUDA SUB DIVISION (UNDER THE ADDL.
          SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE),
          THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 695141


OTHER PRESENT:

          SRI.R.S.KALAKURA, SRI.E.G.GORDEN, SR.GP



     THIS WRIT PETITION     (CIVIL) HAVING     COME UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.05.2024,    THE COURT ON      THE SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.16179/2024

                                 -:3:-




                          J U D G M E N T

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the

3rd respondent to accept and forward Ext.P2 to the 2nd

respondent.

2. The 1st petitioner is a Stage V Chronic Kidney Disease

patient waiting for kidney transplantation. The 2nd petitioner who

is a close family friend of the 1st petitioner has voluntarily

consented to give his kidney to the 1 st petitioner. According to the

petitioners, they have prepared Ext.P2 joint application in Form

No.11 supported by all relevant documents for submission before

the 3rd respondent as prescribed in the Transplantation of Human

Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014. But, the 3 rd respondent is

refusing to accept and forward their joint application to the 2 nd

respondent - District Level Authorization Committee (DLAC) on

the ground of non production of Police Clearance Certificate

('PCC') from the 4th respondent. It is in these circumstances, the

petitioners have approached this Court.

3. Heard Adv.Amalendun.S, the learned counsel for the

petitioner, Adv.R.S. Kalkura, the learned standing counsel

appearing for the 3rd respondent and Adv.E.G.Gorden, the learned

Senior Government Pleader for the respondents.

4. The counsel submitted that the health condition of the

1st petitioner is deteriorating day by day and it became urgent to

conduct Renal Transplantation at the earliest to save his life. The

learned counsel for petitioners relied on the dictums laid down in

Shoukath Ali Pullikuzhiyil & Another v. District Level Authorization

Committee and Others [2017 (3) KHC 259] and Soubiya v. District

Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human

Organs, Ernakulam [2023 (6) KHC 293].

5. In Shoukath Ali (supra), it was held that verification

through police as a routine manner in all cases should generally

be avoided and if Authorization Committee doubts genuineness

of claims or bona fides of persons or genuineness and bona fides

of the documents produced, verification through police can be

ordered. In Soubiya (supra), it was held that the question whether

police clearance certificate is necessary or not should be left to

DLAC.

In the light of the dictum laid down in the above decisions,

this writ petition is ordered in the following manner:

(a) The 3rd respondent - The Local Level Committee for

Renal Transplantation of the Hospital concerned will forward the

applications of the petitioners along with all necessary

documents, except 'Certificate of Altruism', to the 2 nd respondent-

DLAC. It shall be done within a period of one week from the date

of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

(b) On the applications reaching the 2 nd respondent -

DLAC, its competent authority will notify the petitioners and

inform them whether they have to obtain a 'Certificate of

Altruism" from the concerned Police Authority.

(c) If the DLAC finds that no such certificate is required in

this case, they will complete the processes, leading to necessary

permissions to be granted to the petitioners, within a period of

one month thereafter.

(d) However, if on the contrary, the DLAC is to find that

'Certificate of Altruism' is required to be obtained by the

petitioners, they will intimate them of such within a period of two

weeks from the date on which they receive applications from the

3rd respondent; upon which, the petitioners will be required to

obtain the same and produce it before the said Authority, as per

law.

(e) On the afore being done, the DLAC will take a final

decision on the petitioners' request, within a period of one month

from the date on which such Certificate is produced.

(f) If the 2nd respondent calls upon the petitioners to

obtain a 'Certificate of Altruism', the 4th respondent-Deputy

Superintendent of Police, or such other competent authority will

act upon the applications for such to be made before them; and

will issue necessary certificates without any avoidable delay, but

not later than two weeks from the date on which it is received by

them, after making all necessary enquiries.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE Rp

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16179/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 12.10.2023 ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY DR. MOHAMMED IQUBAL. P.H., CONSULTANT NEPHROLOGIST, (REG.NO:20782) OF MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT APPLICATION DATED 08.04.2024 IN FORM NO. 11 OF TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES RULES, 2014.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF FORM NO. 3 SIGNED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE NOTARY PUBLIC ON 08.04.2024 BY GIVING HER CONSENT TO DONATE HIS KIDNEY TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 18.01.2024 SWORN BY THE 1ST AND 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE NOTARY PUBLIC.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN `SOUBIYA V. DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORISATION COMMITTEE FOR TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS, ERNAKULAM (2023 (6) KHC 293)' ALONG WITH ITS CONNECTED CASE.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter