Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C George Jacob vs State Of Kerala, Secretary To Revenue
2024 Latest Caselaw 8669 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8669 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2024

Kerala High Court

C George Jacob vs State Of Kerala, Secretary To Revenue on 27 March, 2024

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
 WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                      WP(C) NO. 32468 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:

           C GEORGE JACOB
           AGED 71 YEARS
           CHERICKAL HOUSE, 12H CHAKOLAS WATERSCAPES,
           PANDITKARUPPAN ROAD, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM,
           PIN - 682012
           BY ADVS.
           JOJU KYNADY
           SAURAV SHAJI


RESPONDENT/S:

     1       STATE OF KERALA, SECRETARY TO REVENUE
             REPRESENTED BY SECRETATRY TO REVENUE, SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 685001
     2       SUB REGISTRAR
             SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, PERUMPALLY
             BUILDING, KPCC JUNCTION, M G ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN
             - 682011
     3       DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, REPRESENTED BY
             SHERISTADAR
             3RD FLOOR, NEW COURT COMPLEX, PARK AVENUE ROAD,
             ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682011
             BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA


OTHER PRESENT:

             GP - DEEPA V


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   27.03.2024,   THE   COURT    ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C). No.32468 of 2023          :2:



                           VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
         --     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                       W.P.(C) No.32468 of 2023
         --     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                  Dated this the 27th day of March, 2024

                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction

to the 2nd respondent to delete the entry dated 12.10.1988 in the

encumbrance certificate with respect to the property owned by the

petitioner.

2. It is averred that the petitioner is the absolute owner and is

in actual physical possession of the land having an extent of 8.995

cents comprised in Survey Nos.989/1- 9 and 989/12 of Perumanoor

Desom, Ernakulam Village, Kannayannur Taluk, Ernakulam

District. The petitioner bought the said land from the Greater

Cochin Development Authority as per Ext.P1 sale deed. The

petitioner has been regularly paying tax in respect of the property

as is evident from Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 possession certificate was also

issued in favour of the petitioner. In the year 2017, the petitioner

filed an application for the issuance of an Encumbrance Certificate

and the petitioner was issued with Ext.P4 encumbrance certificate.

On a perusal of Ext.P4 the petitioner found that there was an entry

'Court/Revenue Order' on 12.10.1988 by Sub Court, Ernakulam at

the instance of one 'Mysore Wine Products Ltd'. The petitioner

submits that even though petitioner had business relationship with

above said M/s Mysore Wine Products Ltd till 1985, petitioner upto

date has not received claim or demand nor any notice from Sub

Court, Ernakulam regarding any litigation with M/s Mysore Wine

Products Ltd. Thereupon the petitioner has preferred an

application before the 2nd respondent to get details by which the

said entry was effected. The petitioner was intimated as per

Exts.P5 and P6 that all the documents were destroyed and that no

details with respect to the case number or order based on which

the entry dated 12.10.1988 was made in the Encumbrance

Certificate is available. A similar reply was given by the 3 rd

respondent also, as per Ext.P8. The petitioner submits that 35

years have passed after the entry was effected in the Encumbrance

Certificate and the petitioner has not received any claim or demand

nor any notice from any Court of Law in respect of his claim. In the

said circumstances that the petitioner has approached this Court

seeking a direction to remove the entry regarding the attachment

in the Encumbrance Certificate.

3. When the matter came up for consideration on an earlier

occasion, this Court has directed the learned Government Pleader

to make available the computer print out of the details entered

regarding the attachment on the subject property, which was

produced along with a memo dated 22.02.2024, in which also the

details of the case number and the address of the parties who has

obtained the attachment is not seen stated and therefore the

computer print out now produced by the learned Government

Pleader could not be of any help to identify the case number or the

details of the party at whose instance the attachment was effected.

4. A statement has been filed by the 2 nd respondent wherein it

is stated that the relevant pages wherein such entries were made

in the register have been destroyed and therefore the office is

unable to issue any certified copy of the order or to provide any

information beyond what is stated in the Encumbrance Certificate.

5. When an attachment is effected and the same is entered in

the register, it is the responsibility of the 2 nd respondent to

maintain proper details of the records such as case number and

the details of the persons in whose name the attachment was

effected. The alleged entries are made on 12.10.1988 by the Sub

Court Ernakulam, which is almost 35 years back.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that the attachment

effected is almost 35 years back and the details of the attachment

is not available with the 2nd respondent, I am of the view that if the

petitioner make necessary request before the 2nd respondent in this

regard, he shall after enquiry in the matter take appropriate

decision to erase the entry of attachment in the Encumbrance

Certificate. It is made clear that the right if any of M/s.Mysore

Wine Products Ltd against the property at whose instance the

attachment was effected will not be extinguished by the order

passed in this writ petition. A certified copy of the judgment shall

be entered in Book No.1 maintained by the 2 nd respondent and

based on which entry of attachment in the encumbrance certificate

could be erased.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32468/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.1423 OF 1982 Exhibit P-2 TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 12/04/2023 Exhibit P-3 TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 27.04.2023 Exhibit P-4 TRUE COPY OF ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE NO.8933/17 DATED 19.05.2017 Exhibit P-5 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 07.09.2017 BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P-6 TRUE COPY OF REPLY LETTER DATED 05.10.2017 FROM 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P-7 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 09.08.2023 BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P-8 TRUE COPY OF REPLY LETTER DATED 22.08.2023 FROM 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter