Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sobi Thomas vs The District Geologist
2024 Latest Caselaw 8661 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8661 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sobi Thomas vs The District Geologist on 27 March, 2024

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
         WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                             WP(C) NO. 10250 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

              SOBI THOMAS,AGED 39 YEARS
              CHUNGATHU HOUSE, 1/370 (IX/2020) ADDATTU (PO)
              THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680554

              BY ADVS.
              BINOY VASUDEVAN
              SREEJITH SREENATH
              RINCY KHADER



RESPONDENTS:

     1        THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
              OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
              MINI CIVIL STATION, CHEMBUKKAVU,
              THRISSUR, PIN - 680020

     2        THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS)
              THALAPILLY TALUK, WADAKKANCHERRY P.O.,
              THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680582

     3        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
              THEKKUMKARA-MANALITHARA VILLAGE,
              THEKKUMKARA (PO), THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680589

OTHER PRESENT:

              GP - AJITH VISWANATHAN



     THIS     WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.10250 of 2024                                 2


                                  VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
                  .................................................................
                             W.P (C) No.10250 of 2024
                  .................................................................
                    Dated this the 27th day of March, 2024


                                        JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking to quash Ext.P6 and for

a direction to issue transit pass to the petitioner after accepting royalty from

him. Petitioner submits that he is in absolute ownership and possession of

50 Ares 57 sq.m. of dry land situated in survey nos.950/3 and 950/4-2 of

Thekkumkara Village in Thalapilly Taluk, Thrissur District obtained as per

Ext.P1 sale deed. After purchase of the property as per Ext.P1 mutation

was effected and tax was paid and possession certificate was also issued

as evident from Exts.P2 and P3. Petitioner with an intention to construct a

residential building in the said property prepared an application before the

local authority and a building permit was issued as per Ext.P4. For the

purpose of construction of the house ordinary earth has to be removed from

the property and Ext.P5 approved plan was also provided by the local

authority. Thereupon petitioner made an application before the 1 st

respondent for issuance of transit passes which has now been rejected as

per Ext.P6 taking a stand that the property is an assigned land. Petitioner

relies on Ext.P7 judgment in W.P.(C) No.4782 of 2022 wherein in an

identical situation this Court has considered the issue and granted

permission. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the said judgment read as follows:

"3. It is evident from Exts.P9 to P12 that the construction of residential buildings is not prohibited in the assigned land. There is also no contention for the respondents that the land is not alienable. It is also not disputed that use for residential purposes will not be a violation of the conditions of the assignment. The development permit is ancillary to the building permit and the removal of the ordinary earth is only for the purpose of effecting the construction. As such, the reasons stated in Ext.P8 are not legally sustainable. The Senior Government Pleader pointed out condition No.8 in Exts.P9 to P12 and submitted that there is a requirement that the assignee or any member of his family and successor-in- interest shall reside in/cultivate the land and that such residence/cultivation shall commence within the period of one year from the date of receipt of the patta. I do not think condition No.8 can have any bearing on the facts of this case. The patta was issued as early as 23.5.1980 and there is no case for the respondent that there has been a violation of any of the conditions of the patta from 1980, till the date of transfer of the property to the petitioner. It is also evident that the petitioner only seeks to use the land for residential purposes, which is an activity permitted as per the assignment. It is also evident that whoever resides in the property will be a successor-in-interest, since alienation is permitted.

4. In the result, the writ petition is allowed. Ext.P8 is quashed. The 1st respondent is directed to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for transit passes and grant the same if the petitioner is otherwise entitled. It is made clear that this judgment will not in any manner affect the reservations available to the Government as

per the Land Assignment Rules."

Petitioner further submits that this Court has followed the abovesaid

judgment and passed similar judgments as evident from Exts.P8 to P10.

Petitioner relies on the conditions in Ext.P11 and P12 pattas especially

condition no.8 that the assignee or any member of his family or successor-

in-interest shall reside in/cultivate the land and such residence/cultivation

shall commence effectively within a period of one year from the date of

receipt of patta.

2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein

construction of a residential building is permitted even as per Exts.P11 and

P12 pattas and that the same has been upheld by this Court in Exts.P7 to

P10 judgments, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition as follows:

Ext.P6 is set aside with a consequential direction to the 1 st

respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for transit

passes and grant the same if the petitioner is otherwise entitled. It is also

made clear the above direction will not in any manner affect the

reservations available to the Government as per the Kerala Land

Assignment Act and Rules.

With the abovesaid direction writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

cks

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10250/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1239/2009 OF S.R.O. WADAKKANCHERRY DATED 17.03.2009

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 03.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 04.09.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT NO.SC1-

BA(23458)/2024 DATED 19.01.2024 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THEKKUMKARA GRARMA PANCHAYAT

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN DULY APPROVED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY DATED 18.01.2024

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.DOTHRDMU/106/2024-5 DATED 08.02.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.05.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO.4782 OF 2022

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.01.2023 IN W.P.(C) NO.409 OF 2023

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.12214 OF 2023 DATED 12.04.2023

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 30.11.2023 IN W.P.(C)NO.38484 OF 2023

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF PATTA BEARING NO. B7.LA1373/83 DATED 11-02-84 ISSUED TO ONE THANKAPPAN

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA BEARING NO. B7/LA 1369/83 DATED 11-02-84 ISSUED TO ONE AMMINI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter