Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.C. Rabiya vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 16972 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16972 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

V.C. Rabiya vs State Of Kerala on 20 June, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
     THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 30th JYAISHTA, 1946
                         WP(C) NO. 4630 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:

          V.C. RABIYA
          AGED 75 YEARS
          W/O.P.P.HASHIM (LATE), BENHUR, THANA P.O.,
          KANNUR-670012.
          BY ADVS.
          M.A.FAYAZ
          SMT.M.VISHNUPRIYA
          SMT.C.B.ABHINAVA


RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REP. BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,
          REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
    2     DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
          CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-670002.
    3     TAHSILDAR, KANNUR,
          KANNUR-670101.
          BY ADV . SRI. VENUGOPAL V., GOVERNMENT PLEADER


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 4630 OF 2020                2



                               JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the wife of late P.P Hashim, one of the partners

of a partnership firm known as M/s. Haris Brothers. M/s Haris

Brothers, along with one Dasappa Kammath and Sons, had taken

on lease about 7 cents of Government land within the limits of

Kannur Municipality, for the purposes of conducting a kerosene

depot. The aforesaid M/s. Dasappa Kammath and Sons retired

from the partnership with effect from 01.04.1988 and the lease

was renewed in favour of M/s. Haris Brothers, Kannur alone. The

lease rent was fixed in terms of the then prevailing Government

orders @ 5% of the land value per cent per annum.

2. It appears from the statement filed by the 3 rd respondent

(on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2) that, on the basis of certain

observations of the Accountant General, Thiruvananthapuram, it

was found that the lease rent was to be collected on higher value

and at a higher rate on account of which an amount of

Rs.12,30,883/- was leviable from M/s. Haris Brothers as arrears

of lease rent for the period from 01.04.1987 till 31.03.2002. The

land was surrendered by the aforesaid M/s.Haris Brothers in the

year 2002 itself. Challenging the demand for enhanced lease

rent, the aforesaid partnership firm (M/s. Haris Brothers) filed

O.P. No.790/2003 before this Court, which was disposed of by

Ext.P3 judgment, directing the 1st respondent in that writ petition

(State of Kerala, represented by the Secretary, Department of

Revenue Secretariat, Trivandrum) to consider the objections

raised against enhancement of lease rent and to take a decision ,

after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in that

writ petition.

3. Pursuant to the interim order in O.P. No.790/2003 and

on the basis of the directions contained in Ext.P3 judgment, a

total sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was paid by M/s.Haris Brothers under

protest towards the demand for lease rent. The statement filed

by the 3rd respondent also indicates that though the

representative of M/s.Haris Brothers was heard on 17.03.2007 by

the Additional Secretary to Revenue department, no orders

appear to have been issued in the matter. That apart, as rightly

contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,

revenue recovery proceedings appear to be only against the

petitioner, who is the wife of late P.P. Hashim, on the premise

that the lease deed at the relevant time was executed by late P.P.

Hashim .

In the background of the aforesaid facts, I am of the view

that revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner cannot

be allowed to continue presently. The decision, directed to be

taken, in terms of Ext.P3 judgment of this court has not been

taken and communicated, though it is stated that a hearing was

held on 17.03.2007. Late P.P. Hashim expired on 25.07.2017. In

such circumstances, this writ petition will stand disposed of,

directing the 1st respondent to take a decision in the matter as

directed in Ext.P3 judgment, after affording an opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner or her authroized representative and

also to any other partners/legal heirs of any deceased partner of

the erstwhile M/s.Haris Brothers. The petitioner shall bring to

the notice of the 1st respondent the details of other partners/legal

heirs of deceased partners of M/s.Haris Brothers, who may also

be equally liable along with the petitioner for any demand for

enhanced lease rent for the period from 01.04.1987 till

31.3.2002. Till such time as orders are passed by the 1 st

respondent after hearing the petitioner or authorised

representative and other partners/legal heirs of any deceased

partner, the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the

petitioner will remain suspended. The decision shall be taken, as

directed above, by the 1st respondent, within a period of six

months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this

judgment.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4630/2020

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF SRI.P.P.HASHIM BY THE KANNUR CORPORATION DATED 25.07.2017.

EXHIBIT P2             PHOTOCOPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.F.F3.18032/88
                       DATED   28.01.2003    ISSUED   BY    THE   3RD
                       RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3             PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP.NO.790/2003
                       DATED 29.11.2006.
EXHIBIT P4             PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPORT NO.F.F3/18032/88

29.03.2007 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOCOPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT 07.03.2007.

EXHIBIT P6 PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE NO.F.3/13445/17 DATED 03.01.2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER'S SON IN LAW DATED 15.01.2020.

EXHIBIT P8             PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3.F3.18032/88
                       DATED   01.09.2008    ISSUED   BY    THE   3RD
                       RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9             PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/18032/88 DATED

30.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P10 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/18032/88 DATED 10.04.2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT .

EXHIBIT P11 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/30039/14 DATED 23.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P12 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/9353/14 DATED 08.05.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P13 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3.13440/17 DATED 26.07.2017 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P14            PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/13445/17(3)
                       DATED   09.05.2019    ISSUED   BY    THE   3RD
                       RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P15            PHOTOCOPY   OF   THE   COMMUNICATION   NO.K.1-

24542/2012 DATED 18.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P16 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.F3/13445/17 DATED 04.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter