Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aneesh vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 15899 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15899 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Aneesh vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                     CRL.MC NO. 3918 OF 2024
    CRIME NO.45/2022 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.955 OF 2022 OF ASSISTANT
         SESSIONS COURT/ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO 1&2:



    1     ANEESH
          AGED 37 YEARS
          S/O KUTTAN, UTHUMBATHUKARAN HOUSE, KIZHAKE KODALY
          THEMALI GRAMA DESOM, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY
          TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680699.
    2     ABEESH
          AGED 39 YEARS
          S/O KUTTAN, UTHUMBATHUKARAN HOUSE, KIZHAKE KODALY
          THEMALI GRAMA DESOM, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY
          TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680699.

          BY ADV RAJESH CHAKYAT


RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:



    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          PIN - 682031.
    2     THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
          VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
          680699.
    3     SABARINATH
          AGED 21 YEARS
          S/O PREMAN, VETTIYATIL HOUSE, KIZHAKE KODALY THEMALI
          GRAMA DESOM, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK,
          THRISSUR, PIN - 680699.

          ADV JOSEPH M.P. - R3
          SREEJA V. - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION           ON
06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.MC No. 3918 of 2024
                                                   2




                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                          ......................................................
                                   Crl.M.C.No.3918 of 2024
                           ...................................................
                          Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024


                                               ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in S.C. No.955/2022 on the files of

the Sub Court, Irinjalakuda, arising out of Crime No.45/2022 of

Vellikulangara Police Station, Thrissur District, registered for the

offences under Sections 447, 323, 324, 308 and 506(ii) r/w Section

34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Third respondent is the defacto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, on 15.01.2022

trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant and

assaulted him and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter

has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the

nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by

continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303],

the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court

can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and

Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another

[(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure 2 affidavit filed by the 3 rd respondent.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification,

it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this

case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing.

The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in

futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in S.C.

No.955/2022 on the files of the Sub Court, Irinjalakuda, are

quashed.

Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/11/06/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE 1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.45/2022 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT DATED 28.02.2022.


ANNEXURE 2                  ORIGINAL    COPY    OF  THE   COMPOUNDING
                            AFFIDAVIT    EXECUTED  BY   THE   DEFACTO

COMPLAINANT /CW1/ 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.04.2024.

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter