Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Xxxxxx vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 15460 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15460 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Xxxxxx vs State Of Kerala on 5 June, 2024

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
     WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                     WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024
 CRIME NO.108/2024 OF THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/MOTHER OF TEH VICTIM:

          XXXXXXXXXX
          XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX

          BY ADV SOJAN MICHEAL


RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
          HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
          POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHAKAD,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010

    3     DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
          ALAPUZHA, PIN - 688505

    4     DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          KAYAMKULAM, PIN - 690502

    5     INSPECTOR OF POLICE
          THRIKKUNNAPUZHA POLICE STATION
          ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690515

          SRI. RENJIT GEORGE, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024
                               2




                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of June, 2024

This writ petition (criminal) has been filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India and the prayers are as under:

"(i) to issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to entrust the Crime No.108/2024 of Thrikkunnapuzha Police Station with an offer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police who is having impeccable track record, forthwith;

(ii) direct the 3rd respondent to monitor the investigation of Crime No.108/2024 of Thrikkunnapuzha Police Station;

(iii) to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent to take appropriate action against the officer who registered Ext.P1 FIR clubbing two distinct and different incident as one crime;

(iv) to dispense with the production of English translations of the documents in vernacular produced in this Writ Petition (Crl.)

(v) to issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case."

WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that though initially no case registered under Section

12 read with Section 11 of the Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act (POCSO for short), when the petitioner

filed complaint before the State Police Chief FIR

No.108/2024 was registered, alleging commission of

offences punishable under Section 509 of IPC and Section

12 read with Section 11(i) of POCSO Act. This Writ Petition

has been filed when the defacto complainant/petitioner

noticed that no proper investigation in this matter is going on

since the accused is a relative of a Home Guard attached to

Thrikkunnapuzha Police Station.

4. This Court granted interim stay not to file final

report as per order dated 08.04.2024 and the same has been

continuing.

WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024

5. In order to address the grievance of the petitioner,

progress of investigation in this crime has been called for and

as per which the Investigating Officer, Sri.Sudheer T.K., Sub

Inspector of Police, Thrikkunnappuzha Police Station,

reported that no crime involved in this case. Thus it appears

that the investigation conducted by the above Sub Inspector

of Police is against the case put up by the petitioner. Along

with the Writ Petition Ext.P4 complaint, filed by the petitioner

before the State Police Chief, pointing out the deficiency in

the investigation by the present Investigating Officer has

been appended.

6. Since the writ petitioner is aggrieved in the matter

of investigation and the present Investigating Officer is of the

opinion that the entire crime is baseless, where the petitioner

would allege that the investigation is not fair, since the

accused is a relative of a Home Guard working in the same

police station, in the interest of justice, the matter would

require investigation at the instance of the higher police WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024

officer. Therefore, this writ petition is allowed in part, directing

the Dy.S.P., Alappuzha to take up investigation in this matter

and file final report after proper investigation.

Filing of final report by the present Investigating Officer

stands deferred, with liberty to the Dy.S.P., Alappuzha to file

final report after investigation.

Sd/-

A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr WP(CRL.) NO. 386 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 386/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

SEALED COVER1 AFFIDAVIT

SEALED COVER 2 COPY OF THE FIR DATED 09.09.2023 IN CRIME NO.597/2023 OF THRIKKUNNAPUZHA POLICE STATION

SEALED COVER 3 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATAD NIL

SEALED COVER 4 COPY OF THE FIR DATED 17.02.2024 IN CRIME NO.108/2024 OF THRIKKUNNAPUZHA POLICE STATION

SEALED COVER 5 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL

SEALED COVER 6 ADDRESS OF TEH PARTY

SEALTED COVER 7 ADDRESS OF THE PARTY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter