Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Septagon Builders And Developers India ... vs Ranjan Kuriakose
2024 Latest Caselaw 15145 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15145 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Septagon Builders And Developers India ... vs Ranjan Kuriakose on 5 June, 2024

Author: Kauser Edappagath

Bench: Kauser Edappagath

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                     OP(C) NO. 1188 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 01.04.2024 IN OS NO.55
OF   2019     OF   ASSISTANT    SESSIONS   COURT/PRINCIPAL   SUB
COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:

     1      SEPTAGON BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS INDIA PRIVATE
            LTD,
            II-FLOOR, SOPHIA BUILDING,
            OPP. BISHOP HOUSE, PATTOM,
            PATTOM P.O.,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
            REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR RENU ABRAHAM,
            PIN - 695004

     2      K. P. V. ABRAHAM,
            AGED 60 YEARS
            S/O. LATE VASU,
            CHAIRMAN,
            M/S. SEPTAGON BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS INDIA
            PRIVATE LTD,
            II- FLOOR, SOPHIA BUILDING,
            OPP. BISHOP HOUSE, PATTOM,
            PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
            PIN - 695004

     3      BLESSAN ABRAHAM
            AGED 30 YEARS
            S/O. K. P. V. ABRAHAM,
            MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. SEPTAGON BUILDERS AND
            DEVELOPERS INDIA PRIVATE LTD,
            II- FLOOR, SOPHIA BUILDING,
            OPP. BISHOP HOUSE, PATTOM,
            PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
            PIN - 695004
 O.P.(C) No.1188 of 2024
                                :2:


    4        RENU ABRAHAM
             AGED 57 YEARS
             W/O. K. P. V. ABRAHAM,
             DIRECTOR M/S. SEPTAGON BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
             INDIA PRIVATE LTD,
             II- FLOOR, SOPHIA BUILDING,
             OPP. BISHOP HOUSE, PATTOM,
             PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND
             RESIDING AT "NAZARETH", XIX/322,
             MUTTADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695025

             BY ADVS.
                G.RAJEEV
                AJITH KUMAR.S
                NAVEEN RADHAKRISHNAN

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:

    1        RANJAN KURIAKOSE,
             AGED 49 YEARS
             S/O. T. N. KURIAKOSE,
             RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.3, PRASANTH HILL,
             NEAR CDS, PRASANTH NAGAR,
             ULLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695011

    2        HANNAH RANJAN,
             AGED 42 YEARS
             W/O. RANJAN KURIAKOSE,
             RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.3, PRASANTH HILL,
             NEAR CDS, PRASANTH NAGAR, U
             LLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
             PIN - 695011
     THIS     OP   (CIVIL)    HAVING   COME   UP    FOR    ADMISSION   ON
05.06.2024,     THE   COURT    ON   THE   SAME     DAY    DELIVERED    THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C) No.1188 of 2024
                              :3:




                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of June, 2024

Ext. P15 order allowing amendment of the counter claim is

under challenge in this Original Petition.

2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are

the defendants in OS No.55/2019 on the files of the Principal Sub

Court, Thiruvananthapuram (for short 'trial court'). Ext.P1 is the

plaint. The suit was filed to realise a sum of Rs.2,22,93,907/- from

the defendants and also for a decree of permanent prohibitory

injunction. The defendants entered appearance and filed Ext.P2

written statement disputing the plaint claim. Later they raised

Ext.P3 counter claim along with additional written statement. In

the counter claim the defendants claimed that on account of the

breach of contractual obligation by the plaintiff, they have

sustained damages which was estimated at Rs.2 Crores. The

counter claim was preferred to realise the said sum. Thereafter, a

Commissioner was deputed along with an expert to estimate the

damages. Accordingly, the Commissioner filed a report. Ext.P11

is the report. Thereafter, the defendants filed Ext.P13 application

to amend counter claim to enhance the damages claimed in tune

with the damages assessed by the Commissioner. The trial court

as per the impugned order allowed the amendment application.

Challenging the said order, this Original Petition has been filed.

3. Heard both sides.

4. It is true that the amendment application was filed after

the commencement of the trial. However, it is a fact that the

amendment was sought in tune with the report of the

Commissioner which was filed just before the commencement of

the trial. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention that the

application could have been filed earlier. It is settled that even

after the commencement of the trial, pleadings can be amended if

it is found necessary for the just decision of the case. As stated

already, the counter claim has been preferred by the defendants

claiming damages from the plaintiffs. The Commissioner was

deputed to assess the damages. The amendment was sought in

tune with the damages assessed by the Commissioner. The

amendment would not alter or change the nature or character of

the counter claim. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned

order. Accordingly, the Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE MSA

APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1188/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DT.19-03-2019 IN O.S. NO. 55 OF 2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL WRITTEN STATEMENT DATED NIL TO EXHIBIT P1 SUIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ADDL. WRITTEN STATEMENT WITH COUNTERCLAIM DT.27-03-2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN IN EXHIBIT P1 SUIT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT DT.22- 06-2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN TO THE EXHIBIT P3 ADDL. WRITTEN STATEMENT WITH COUNTERCLAIM.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 6 OF 2023 DT.28-11- 2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN EXHIBIT P1 SUIT

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DT.01- 12-2023, FILED BY THE PETITIONERS TO EXHIBIT P5

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 7 OF 2023 DT.28-11- 2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN FOR REMOVING EXHIBIT P1 OUT OF LIST FOR TRIAL.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DT.01- 12-2023, FILED BY THE PETITIONERS TO EXHIBIT P7

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT IN-LIEU OF EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS DT.06-12-2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT DATED.01-03-2024 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER GOWRI NATH S.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DT. 16-03- 2024 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER GOWRI NATH S.

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION DT.25-03-2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN TO EXHIBIT P11 COMMISSION REPORT

Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 9 OF 2024 DT. 22- 03-2024 PRAYING TO AMEND THE EXHIBIT P3 ADDITIONAL WRITTEN STATEMENT WITH COUNTERCLAIM

Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DT.25- 03-2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN AGAINST EXHIBIT P13

Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT.01-04-2024 IN EXHIBIT P13 APPLICATION IN EXHIBIT P1 SUIT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter