Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepa.G. Nair vs The Authorised Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 5869 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5869 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Deepa.G. Nair vs The Authorised Officer on 23 February, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
     FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945
                        WP(C) NO. 7187 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

     1     DEEPA.G. NAIR
           AGED 50 YEARS
           W/O. SURESH BABU, POWATHIL HOUSE,
           MALLAPPALLY EAST.P.O.,
           PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689584
     2     SURESH BABU
           AGED 54 YEARS
           S/O T.S GOVINDAPILLAI, POWATHIL HOUSE,
           MALLAPPALLY EAST.P.O.,
           PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689584

           BY ADV R.SANTHOSH BABU


RESPONDENTS:

     1     THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
           THE THIRUVALLA EAST CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3260
           HEAD OFFICE, ERAVIPEROOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 686542
     2     THE BRANCH MANAGER
           THE THIRUVALLA EAST CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3260
           HEAD OFFICE, ERAVIPEROOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 686542

           SRI.T.P.PRADEEP (SC)-R1 & R2



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024
                                  2




                            JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of February , 2024

The petitioners have approached this Court aggrieved

by the coercive proceedings for recovery of financial

advance made by the Thiruvalla East Co-operative Bank

Limited to the petitioners, invoking the provisions of the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

2. The Bank paid ₹10 lakhs to the 1st petitioner as

Consumption Loan in the year 2020. The 2nd petitioner is the

guarantor. The petitioners state that though the petitioners

made remittances promptly during the initial repayment period

of the financial advance, they could not pay the repayment

installments promptly later due to Covid-19 pandemic. The

repayment of loan fell into arrears. It happened due to

reasons beyond the control of the petitioners. WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

3. Though the petitioners requested the Bank to

permit the petitioners to repay the overdue amounts in easy

monthly installments, the Bank authorities were not yielding.

The authorities, instead started coercive proceedings invoking

the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002 and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and

issued Ext.P2 notice.

4. The petitioners state that they are still in a position

to clear the overdue amounts towards the loan, if sufficient

time is given to clear the dues in easy monthly installments. If

the respondents are permitted to continue with the coercive

proceedings and auction the secured assets provided by the

petitioners, they will be put to untold hardship and loss.

5. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf of

the Bank and denied all the statements made by the

petitioners. On behalf of the respondents, it is submitted that WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

the loan was given to the petitioners in the year 2020. The

petitioners committed default in repaying the loan.

6. The Bank repeatedly reminded the petitioners and

required them to clear the dues. The petitioners deliberately

omitted to do so. In the circumstances, the Bank had no other

go than to proceed against the petitioners invoking the

provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002. The impugned Ext.P2 notice was issued in these

circumstances. The petitioners have not advanced any legal

reasons to thwart the coercive proceedings initiated by the

Bank.

7. The Standing Counsel, however, submitted that if

the petitioners are ready and willing to make a substantial

payment soon and remit the balance overdue amount

immediately thereafter, a short breathing time can be granted

to the petitioners to clear the dues. The Standing Counsel WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

submitted that the outstanding amount due to the Bank from

the petitioners as on 23.02.2024 is ₹15,43,010/- and the

overdue amount as on 23.02.2024 is ₹10,54,925/-

8. I have heard the counsel for the petitioners and the

Standing Counsel representing the Bank.

9. The specific case of the petitioners is that the

petitioners have been making the repayment and maintaining

the loan account initially. The default in repayment of the loan

occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the

petitioners. The petitioners have provided substantial security

which will safeguard the interest of the Bank.

10. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am

inclined to dispose of the writ petition giving a short and

reasonable time to the petitioners to clear off the liability.

11. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with the

following directions:

WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

(i) The petitioners shall remit the balance

overdue amount of ₹10,54,925/- in 12

consecutive and equal monthly installments

along with accruing interest and other Bank

charges, if any. First of such instalments

shall be paid on or before 25.03.2024.

(ii) If the petitioners commit default in

making payments as directed above, the

respondents will be at liberty to continue with

the coercive proceedings against the

petitioners in accordance with law.

(iii) The petitioners shall also pay current

EMIs along with the aforesaid payments.

(iv) If the petitioners make payments as

directed above, coercive proceedings, if any,

against the petitioners shall stand deferred.

WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

(v) The petitioners will be at liberty to

approach the Bank for availing One Time

Settlement in the meanwhile, without

violating the payment schedule as directed

above.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh WP(C) NO.7187 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7187/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF 2ND PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE GOVT.

MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL KOTTAYAM DATED 23/01/2021 Exhibit P1(a) TRUE COPY OF PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 25- 09-2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P1(b) TRUE COPY OF PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 30- 09-2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22-01- 2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE/ NEWS ITEM APPEARED IN THE DESHABHIMANI DAILY DATED 30-01-2024 REGARDING THE TAKE OVER OF POSSESSION OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONERS Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 31-01-2024 ADDRESSED TO 1ST RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter