Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.K.Appunni vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 23231 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 23231 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024

Kerala High Court

P.K.Appunni vs The State Of Kerala on 2 August, 2024

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
        FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946
                          WP(C) NO. 17569 OF 2018
PETITIONER:

              P.K.APPUNNI
              AGED 81 YEARS, S/O. P.K.KITTAN,
              ASSISTANT ENGINEER (RETIRED),
              PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
              PERINGATHARAYIL PERINJANAM,
              THRISSUR - 680 651.
              BY ADVS.
              SRI.G.P.SHINOD
              SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR
              SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN

RESPONDENTS:

    1         THE STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
              PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
              GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
    2         THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
              OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
              PWD BUILDING DIVISION,
              ST. MARYS COLLEGE ROAD,UDAYA NAGAR,
              CHEMBUKAVU,THRISSUR - 680 005.
    3         THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
              OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
              CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
              THRISSUR - 680 003.
    4         THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR
              TALUK OFFICE, KODUNGALLUR,
              THRISSUR - 680 664.
              SRI. JUSTINE JACOB -SR.GP


     THIS     WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON
02.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 17569 OF 2018
                                   2




                        JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2024

The above writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to

quash Exts.P4 and P5 demand notices initiated against the

petitioner under Sections 7 and 34 of the Kerala Revenue

Recovery Act, to recover an amount of Rs.7,02,069/- along with

interest, cost and other charges as per law.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The petitioner retired from service as an Executive

Engineer in the year 1992. After his retirement, there was a

direction to the first respondents to recover the loss sustained

to the Government on account of the retender of the work of

Pre vocational Training Centre, Koratti, due to the alleged

negligence of the petitioner and three others while on duty. The

loss so assessed was apportioned among the petitioner and

other officers of the department. For recovery of the said

amount, Exts.P4 and P5 demand notices were issued to the

petitioner.

3. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well

as the learned Government Pleader appearing for the WP(C) NO. 17569 OF 2018

respondents.

4. The first respondent, State of Kerala, instituted a

suit as O.S.No.801 of 2012 before the Sub Court, Irinjalakuda

for recovery of the amount due from the petitioner. However,

the suit was dismissed as per the judgment dated 25.07.2015.

Pursuant to the dismissal of the said suit, the respondents

issued Exts.P4 and P5 demand notices, for the recovery of

amount due from the petitioner.

5. As far as the recovery proceeding is concerned, the

issue has been concluded as per Ext.P3 judgment of the court

below. It is admitted that no further appeal was filed against

Ext.P3 judgment. I find that the claim of the respondents as

regards for recovery of the amount aforementioned will not

stand since the subject issue by and between the petitioner and

the State Government have concluded as per Ext.P3 judgment.

Hence, the respondents are not entitled to initiate further

recovery proceedings on the same account and such recovery

action is also barred by the principles of res judicata. Similar

matter was also considered by this Court in W.P.(C) No.16951

of 2018, in respect of other officers against whom revenue

recovery proceedings were initiated for the alleged dues. As WP(C) NO. 17569 OF 2018

per judgment dated 24.06.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 16951 of 2018,

the said writ petition was also allowed, setting aside the

revenue recovery proceedings.

Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed and Exts.P4 and P5

revenue recovery notices are set aside.

Sd/-

SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE RK WP(C) NO. 17569 OF 2018

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17569/2018

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.10.2009 IN WPC NO. 28301 OF 2009 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.11.2009 IN WPC NO. 31387 OF 2009 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DAED 25.07.2015 IN OS NO. 801 OF 2012 OF THE SUB COURT IRINJALAKKLA.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 09.05.2018 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT.

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 09.5.2018 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter