Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.K. Hariharan vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9727 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9727 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

M.K. Hariharan vs State Of Kerala on 4 April, 2024

Author: K. Babu

Bench: K. Babu

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
     THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                          CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024
    CRIME NO.77/2024 OF Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam
AGAINST   THE   ORDER/JUDGMENT    DATED    IN   CRMC    NO.397    OF   2024   OF
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT:

             M.K. HARIHARAN
             AGED 70 YEARS
             MARIYEL HOUSE, IRUMBANAM, SHAPPUPADY THIRUVAMKULAM,
             ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682023
             BY ADVS.
             M.A.JOSEPH MANAVALAN
             JOSEPH C.J.


RESPONDENT:

             STATE OF KERALA
             THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HILL PALACE POLICE
             STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
             OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
              SRI.G.SUDHEER.P.P

     THIS     CRIMINAL   APPEAL   HAVING    COME   UP    FOR     ADMISSION    ON
04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024
                                         2

                                 K.BABU, J.
                       --------------------------------------
                          Crl.A.No.621 of 2024
                     ---------------------------------------
                Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024


                              JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled

Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

1989. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated

13.02.2024 in Crl.M.C. No.397 of 2024 passed by the Special

Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989, Ernakulam Division.

2. The appellant is the accused in Crime No.77 of 2024 of

Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam. He is alleged to have

committed offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian

Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (for short

'the Act').

The prosecution case:

3. The appellant is not a member of Scheduled Caste or CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024

Scheduled Tribe. He is running a textile shop near Irumpanam

junction. The deceased who belongs to Scheduled Caste visited

the textile shop on 12.01.2024 at about 3.45 p.m. The appellant

intentionally inflicted a cut injury on the head of the deceased

using a chopper. The deceased succumbed to the injuries.

4. Notice was served to the son of the deceased. He

appeared in person and submitted that if the petitioner is

released on bail there is possibility that he would physically

attack him.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

6. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that

the appellant is innocent of the allegations. It is submitted that

at the time of occurrence the deceased was in a drunken

condition. The deceased entered the textile shop of the

appellant and snatched away the cash box. The appellant

restrained the deceased from taking away the cash box. A

scuffle occurred. The appellant had no intention to commit the CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024

alleged acts.

7. The appellant is aged seventy years. He was arrested

on 12.01.2024 and has been in judicial custody since then. The

learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is over

and the final report has already been filed. The prosecution has

no case that further detention of the appellant is required.

There is no material to substantiate the apprehension raised by

the son of the deceased.

8. Having considered the entire circumstances, including

the age of the appellant, the stage of investigation and the

tenure of the judicial custody undergone by him, I feel that the

appellant is entitled to be released on bail .

In the result,

(i) The Criminal Appeal is allowed.

(ii) The order dated 13.02.2024 dismissing Crl.M.C

No.397 of 2024 stands set aside.

(iii) The appellant shall be released on bail on his

executing bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024

Lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the

like sum to the satisfaction of the trial court.

(iv) The appellant shall not maintain any contact

with the witnesses or threaten them.

Sd/-

K. BABU JUDGE saap CRL.A NO. 621 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN CRLMC NO 397/2024 SESSIONS COURT ERNAKULAM DATED 13- 2-2024 Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN CRLMC NO 703/2024 SESSIONS COURT ERNAKULAM DATED 12-3-2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter