Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9707 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
CRL.A NO. 430 OF 2024
CRIME NO.16/2024 OF MALA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 20.02.2024 IN CMP NO.47 OF
2024 OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST ATROCITIES ACT CASES,
THRISSUR
APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
ANIL KUMAR K.K,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O KRISHNAN, KOLAPARAMBU, THURUTHUMMURI,
MALA, PALLIPURAM P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680732
BY ADVS.
M.G.SREEJITH
VIDYAJITH M.
ROJIN DEVASSY
BINCY JOSE
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 DEVAKI,
W/O SUBRAMANYAN, ARIKKATT HOUSE,
THIRUTHUMURI DESOM, POYYA VILLAGE,
THRISSUR DISTRICT ,KEARALA,
POYYA P.O., PIN - 680733
BY ADV
SRI.G SUDHEER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl.A No.430 of 2024
2
K.BABU, J.
--------------------------------------
Crl.A No.430 of 2024
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024
ORDER
This is an appeal filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. The appellant is the accused in Crime No.16/2024 of Mala
Police Station. The offences alleged against the appellant are
punishable under Sections 448 and 307 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. The prosecution case is that on 03.01.2021 at about 5.30 p.m
the appellant trespassed into the residence of the victim and
voluntarily caused grievous hurt to her by using an axe. The
appellant committed the above act with the knowledge that if he by
that act caused death of the victim, he would be guilty of murder.
4. The appellant was arrested on 03.01.2024 and has been in
judicial custody since then.
5. Though the notice was served on the victim, she did not
turn up.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
Public Prosecutor.
7. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
investigation is almost over. Therefore, the further detention of the
appellant is not required.
8. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the
Investigating Officer submitted the final report in the matter.
9. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the
appellant.
10. I have gone through the materials placed before this Court.
Having considered the entire circumstances, including the fact that
the Investigating Officer submitted the final report, I feel that the
appellant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result,
(i) The Criminal Appeal is allowed.
(ii) The order dated 20.02.2024 dismissing C.M.P
No.47 of 2024 passed by the Special Court for
SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Thrissur, stands set
aside.
(iii) The appellant shall be released on bail on his
executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each
for the like sum to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
K.BABU, JUDGE KAS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!