Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9474 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 SARADA AGED 63 YEARS W/O. SOMAN NAIR, VATHALLUR
HOUSE, P.O.ALANELLUR, MANNARKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD
DISTRICT-., PIN - 678601
2 CHAMI AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. PARIYANI, NEDUNGOTTIL VEEDU,
P.O. KACHERIPARAMBU, KOTTOPADAM, MANNARKAD TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678601
BY ADVS. P.JAYARAM
P.B.AJOY
K.R.PAUL
ARJUN P.P.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF PALAKKAD, PIN - 678014
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATTUKAL POLICE STATION,
P.O. NATTUKAL, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678583
3 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
4 RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 73 YEARS, S/O. DAMODHARAN NAIR,
KRISHNASADAN, ALANELLUR TOWN, P.O. ALANELLUR, MANNARKAD
TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678601
5 ADDL. R5. SIVADASAN, AGED 72 YEARS S/O DAMODARAN NAIR
(LATE), KRISHNA SADAN, ALANALLUR, ALANALLUR-I,
PALAKKAD, KERALA- 67801
6 ADDL. R6. RADHADEVI. K., W/O PADMANABHA MENON, BEENA
NIVAS, VANIYAMKULAM-I, PALAKKAD, PANAYUR, KERALA-
679522.
7 ADDL. R7. DEVAKI, AGED 76 YEARS W/O KARUNAKARAN C.K.,
ALANGATT HOUSE, SANGEETHA ROAD, PERINTHALMANNA,
MALAPPURAM, KERALA -679322.
WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
2
8 ADDL. R8. SETHUMADHAVAN C., AGED 84 YEARS, S/O JANAKI
AMMA C., MODAMKIZI HOUSE, SANGEETHA ROAD,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPRUAM, PERINTHALMANNA -679322.
9 ADDL. R9. SARALADEVI M.P., AGED 71 YEARS, D/O.
PADMAVATHIYAMMA, KAILASAM, SANGEETHA ROAD,
PERINTALMANNA, MALAPPURAM, PERINTALMANNA-679322.
10 ADDL. R10. SUMATHI, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O CHANDRASEKAR
A.K., CHANDRA NIVAS, ERANTHODE, NEAR KRISHI BHAVAN
ANGADIPPURAM, VALAMBUR, MALAPPURAM -679325.
11 ADDL. R11. SUNIL KUMAR M., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.
SETHUMADHAVAN M.P., MELEMADATHIL HOUSE, KARALMANNA
POST, CHERPULACHERRY, KARALMANNA, PALAKKAD, KERALA-
679506.
12 ADDL. R12. VIJAYALAKSHMI A.K., AGED 72 YEARS,
AYINIKOTTIL, VATTAMANNAPPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD, KERALA-
679506.
13 ADDL. R13. SANKARANARAYANAN K., AGED 59 YEARS, S/O
DAMODARAN NAIR, KRISHNA SADAN, NEAR VILLAGE OFFICE,
ALANALLUR, ALANNALLUR 1 PALAKKAD-678601.
14 ADDL. R14. SOBHANA, AGED 64 YEARS, D/O DAKSHAYANI
AMMA, KRISHNA SADAN, CHANDAPPADI, ALANNALLUR,
PALAKKAD-678601.
15 ADDL. R15. INDIRA, AGED 60, D/O DAMODARAN NAIR (LATE),
KRISHNA SADAN, CHANDAPPADI, ALANNALUR PALAKKAD-
678601.
16 ADDL. R16. LATHA K , AGED 57 YEARS, W/O SIVADASAN
C.P., PLOT NO. 31, D NO. 38/5 GURUVAYURAPPAN NAGAR,
HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMIL NADU-635109.
17 ADDL. R17. SETHU MADHAVAN K., AGED 76 YEARS, AGED 76
YEARS, S/O DHAMODHARAN NAIR, BHAGAVATH VILLA,
KOLAKKADA, PERINTHALMANNA MALAPPURAM -679322.
18 ADDL. R18. GIRIJA M.P., AGED 62 YEARS, W/O VISWANATHAN
P, PETTAMANNA, EDATHANNATTUKARA P.O., PALAKKAD-
678601.
19 ADDL. R19. M.P RAMAKRISHAN, AGED 73 YEARS, S/O U
NARAYANAN NAIR, UMMANATH, PULLIKKUTH, MELATTUR,
MALAPPURAM-679326.
WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
3
20 ADDL. R20. VASUDEVAN M.P, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O
NARAYANAN NAIR, SREEHARI HOUSE, KOVILAKAM KUNDU NORTH,
MANJERI, MALAPPURAM -676121.
21 ADDL. R21. PADMANABHAN NAIR, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O
PADMANABHAN NAIR, MODANKUZHI, CHUNDOTTUKUNNU,
EDATHANATTUKARA, PALAKKAD -678601.
22 ADDL. R22. RAVINDRAN M.P., AGED 64 YEARS, S/O KELUNNI,
LAKSHMI NIVAS, THIRUVIZHAMKUNNU, KOTTOPPADAM-I,
PALAKKAD -678601.
23 ADDL. R23. REGHUNATHAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O KELUNNIO,
MODAN KUZHI, POTTANCHOLAYIL, KOTTOPPADAM-I, PALAKKAD-
678601
(ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL. RESPONDENTS R5 TO R23 AS PER
ORDER DATED 14.03.2024 IN I.A. 1/2023 IN WP(C)
5528/2023).
BY ADVS. SABU GEORGE . M.B.SOORI
P.B.KRISHNAN(K/1193/1994)
P.B.SUBRAMANYAN(K/1145/2009)
B.ANUSREE(K/000951/2016)
MANU VYASAN PETER(K/000652/2013)
PAUL C THOMAS
BALAMURALI K.P.
HARIPRIYA.M
SRI P M SHAMEER-GP;
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
4
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court alleging that
the party respondents are obstructing their right of passage
through a pathway, though they have no exclusive right over it.
They say that the first petitioner, therefore, preferred various
complaints before respondents 1 and 2 seeking protection, but
that they remain unheeded, thus constraining them to approach
this Court through this writ petition.
2. In response to the afore allegations of the petitioners, as
made by their learned counsel - Sri.Jayaram, the learned
counsel for the fourth respondent - Sri.P.B.Subramanyan,
submitted that the afore assertions are wrong and that no
blockade has been created, nor will be done in the future by his
client.
3. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 23
adopted the afore submissions of Sri.P.B.Subramaniam, adding
that the assertions of the petitioners are all untrue.
4. Sri.P.M.Shameer - learned Government Pleader, affirmed
that there is no blockade on the pathway at all and that the
police are maintaining law and order. He explained that some
of the party respondents appear to take the stand that the WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
second petitioner is a stranger and that he has no right over the
property in question; however, that these are not issues into
which the police can enter and will enter, but that they will
ensure that none of them take law into their own hands.
5. I have no doubt that the afore position adopted by the
Police is the most apposite in the given circumstances.
In the afore circumstances, recording the submissions of
Sri.P.B.Subramaniam and that of the counsel for respondents 5
to 23, I allow this writ petition, directing the second respondent
to ensure that law and order is maintained in the area in
question and that no one is allowed to create any illegal
blockade over the pathway in question, though the rival
remedies before the Civil Courts are fully left open.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
stu WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5528/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LOCATION SKETCH OF THE OBSTRUCTED WAY AND THE SURROUNDINGS PREPARED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTOPADAM-III VILLAGE
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 06/01/2021 SENT BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTOPADAM-III VILLAGE TO THE TALUK OFFICE, CONTAINING DETAILS OF OBSTRUCTION TO THE WAY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES WITH THE NON-CO-OPERATION OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO AMICABLY SETTLE THE ISSUE BEFORE THE JANAKEEYA SAMITHI IN THE VILLAGE
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 03/12/2022 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER'S HUSBAND, SOMAN NAIR, THE 2ND PETITIONER AND OTHERS BEFORE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATTUKAL POLICE STATION AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 11/12/2022 ISSUED FROM THE NATTUKAL POLICE STATION WITH RESPECT TO EXT.P3 COMPLAINT
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8/12/2022 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATTUKAL AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 8/12/2022 ISSUED FROM THE NATTUKAL POLICE STATION WITH RESPECT TO EXT.P5 COMPLAINT
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 20/12/2022 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON OBSTRUCTION TO THE WAY AND DESTRUCTION OF FENCING
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21/12/2022 ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PALAKKAD WITH RESPECT TO EXT.P7 COMPLAINT
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 1357 OF 2019, SRO ALANELLUR, WHEREBY, THE 2ND PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY ON THE SIDES OF THE OBSTRUCTED WAY WP(C) NO. 5528 OF 2023
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 26/12/2022 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF 1ST PETITIONER'S SON, SARATH SOMAN, FROM VILLAGE OFFICE, KOTTOPADAM-III VILLAGE SHOWING ACTUAL POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTIES HELD BY SARATH SOMAN ON THE SIDES OF THE OBSTRUCTED WAY
Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING OBSTRUCTION TO THE WAY MADE BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P12 A true copy of the application for purchase certificate of the ancestral home and property showing 1st petitioner also as a co-owner, filed by the 4th respondent before Land Tribunal, Agali
Exhibit P13 Photographs showing clearer pictures of the way and the obstruction
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit-R4(a) A true copy of the Circular issued by the State Police Chief dated 01-03-2012
Exhibit-R4(b) A true copy of the application dated 09-01- 2023 filed under the Right to Information Act,
Exhibit-R4(c) A true copy of the information dated 02-02- 2023 given by the State Public Information Officer, Kottoppadam Panchayat
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!